本文選題：思想政治教育 + 治理��； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：“治理”理念最先流行于國際社會。當(dāng)國際社會提出治理理論并展開廣泛討論時(shí),幾乎與國際學(xué)界保持著相同的節(jié)奏,國內(nèi)學(xué)者對于治理理論也展開了研究。這種研究從最初的譯介和解讀,逐漸深化到對中國現(xiàn)實(shí)問題的分析與回應(yīng),呈現(xiàn)出從淺入深、由點(diǎn)及面、逐漸升溫的態(tài)勢。尤其是十八屆三中全會將“推進(jìn)國家治理體系和治理能力現(xiàn)代化”作為全面深化改革的總目標(biāo)之一,并首次提出“創(chuàng)新社會治理體制”,這是對馬克思主義國家理論的重大創(chuàng)新。其中,用“社會治理”替代“社會管理”,是我黨政治文件中一次頗具新意的理論表述,是我黨多年來對社會改革實(shí)踐進(jìn)行理性反思的重大理論成果�！爸卫怼币约啊吧鐣卫怼钡奶岢�,立刻引發(fā)了社會各界的廣泛關(guān)注和激烈討論。社會治理一經(jīng)提出,便為思想政治教育功能提供了新的創(chuàng)新動力和發(fā)展空間。創(chuàng)新社會治理體制,客觀上要求思想政治教育做出積極回應(yīng),需要以其獨(dú)特的方式,對治理進(jìn)行解讀和宣傳,以推動全社會對治理的認(rèn)知、認(rèn)同以及踐行。在回應(yīng)和研究的過程中,必然建構(gòu)起思想政治教育與社會的新關(guān)系,產(chǎn)生思想政治教育的新功能。思想政治教育的功能是多方面的,從概念維度、本質(zhì)維度、對象維度以及環(huán)境維度進(jìn)行考察,它呈現(xiàn)出不同的特性和功能。伴隨著社會治理的發(fā)展和思想政治教育功能的擴(kuò)展,二者在“實(shí)施主體”、“作用對象”、“實(shí)施過程”、“方式目標(biāo)”以及“功能原則”等方面具有密切關(guān)聯(lián)性。思想政治教育的社會治理功能,即在“思想政治教育社會治理活動”中產(chǎn)生的功能。它是思想政治教育面對新形勢、新環(huán)境做出的積極回應(yīng),是其特有功能在社會治理領(lǐng)域中的體現(xiàn),是其固有功能的延伸和拓展,是有意識、有目的地將社會治理納入思想政治教育價(jià)值目標(biāo)范圍的表現(xiàn)。它是由諸多功能組成的結(jié)構(gòu)體系。從核心層次看,它具有思想整合功能、價(jià)值引領(lǐng)功能、道德教化功能以及心理疏導(dǎo)功能;從中間層次看,它具有利益調(diào)節(jié)功能、矛盾化解功能、沖突協(xié)調(diào)功能、活力激發(fā)功能;從外圍層次看,它具有促進(jìn)治理主體平等對話、監(jiān)督治理過程實(shí)施、彌補(bǔ)“剛性”治理手段的不足以及社會輿情收集和信息反饋的功能。在馬克思主義經(jīng)典作家、中國共產(chǎn)黨人理論著作、思想政治教育學(xué)、公共治理理論等理論寶庫中,都蘊(yùn)藏著豐富的思想政治教育社會治理的思想。發(fā)揮思想政治教育的社會治理功能具有現(xiàn)實(shí)性和緊迫性。基于對社會治理中“社會”的分析和界定,在社會轉(zhuǎn)型期,社會治理的場域主要集中于“社會事業(yè)領(lǐng)域改革”、“社會結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整”、“社會公共安全”、“社會輿情管理”以及“社會生活方式”等五個(gè)領(lǐng)域。與此相對應(yīng),思想政治教育需要在化解社會各種矛盾、加強(qiáng)社會道德和誠信體系建設(shè)、維護(hù)社會穩(wěn)定和社會意識形態(tài)安全、不斷滿足群眾精神文化需求等方面發(fā)揮更大的作用。這是發(fā)揮思想政治教育社會治理功能所面臨的現(xiàn)實(shí)課題。目前,在社會治理過程中,思想政治教育的作用似乎顯得較為微弱,治理效果不甚理想。究其原因,思想政治教育過程中的管控思維明顯,偏離了社會治理的主旨;思想政治教育工作體制尚不健全,阻礙了社會治理的實(shí)施;從環(huán)境因素看,思想政治教育環(huán)境狀況復(fù)雜多變,增加了社會治理的難度;從方式方法因素看,思想政治教育實(shí)施方式欠佳,弱化了社會治理的作用;從人的因素看,思想政治教育者和教育對象呈現(xiàn)諸多問題,影響了社會治理的效果。要想充分發(fā)揮思想政治教育的社會治理功能,就需要努力消除不良因素的影響,形成社會治理的合力。為此,要?jiǎng)?chuàng)新理念,實(shí)現(xiàn)“管理”向“治理”的轉(zhuǎn)變,處理好維穩(wěn)與維權(quán)的關(guān)系;建立并完善思想政治教育社會治理工作機(jī)制,有效化解社會矛盾;深入開展道德領(lǐng)域突出問題的專項(xiàng)教育和綜合治理,改良社會風(fēng)氣;強(qiáng)化社會主義核心價(jià)值觀在社會治理中的引領(lǐng)作用,營造健康社會輿論環(huán)境;運(yùn)用綜合多樣的載體和方式方法,提升社會協(xié)同治理的功效;培育現(xiàn)代社會的公民意識,激發(fā)社會活力�？傮w而言,對“思想政治教育社會治理功能”的研究遵循“提出問題—分析問題—解決問題”的邏輯線路,以文獻(xiàn)研究法、交叉學(xué)科研究法和比較研究法為主要方法。在梳理大量文獻(xiàn)資料的基礎(chǔ)上,將社會治理理論引入思想政治教育領(lǐng)域,并將二者進(jìn)行融合,深入剖析二者的關(guān)聯(lián)性;在界定“思想政治教育社會治理功能”內(nèi)涵、特征的基礎(chǔ)上,對其12項(xiàng)功能進(jìn)行分類歸納,力圖較為全面、清晰地展現(xiàn)思想政治教育社會治理功能的結(jié)構(gòu)體系;在分析思想政治教育社會治理功能所面臨的現(xiàn)實(shí)問題和影響因素的基礎(chǔ)上,找到了發(fā)揮思想政治教育社會治理功能最大化的切入點(diǎn),力求實(shí)現(xiàn)二者的融合與創(chuàng)新。
[Abstract]:The concept of "governance" was first popular in the international community. When the international community put forward the theory of governance and extensive discussion, it almost kept the same rhythm with the international community. The domestic scholars have also studied the theory of governance. This kind of research has gradually deepened from the original translation and interpretation to the analysis and response to the reality of China. This is one of the general objectives of deepening the reform in the third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, especially in the third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, which is "promoting the national governance system and the modernization of governance capacity", and first put forward "innovative social governance system". This is a major innovation for Marx's theory of the state. The replacement of "social management" is a new theoretical expression in the political documents of our party. It is a major theoretical result of our party's Rational Reflection on the practice of social reform for many years. "Governance" and "social governance" have aroused wide attention and heated discussion from all walks of life. It provides a new creative power and space for ideological and political education. The innovation of the social governance system requires a positive response to the ideological and political education. It needs to read and propagate the governance in its unique way, in order to promote the cognition, identification and practice of the whole society in the process of governance. There must be a new relationship between Ideological and political education and society and the new function of Ideological and political education. The function of Ideological and political education is multifaceted, from the concept dimension, the essential dimension, the object dimension and the environmental dimension, which presents different characteristics and power. It is accompanied by the development of social governance and ideological and political education. The two are closely related to the "implementation subject", "the action object", "the implementation process", "the mode goal" and "the function principle". The social governance function of the ideological and political education is the function produced in the "Ideological and political education social governance activities". It is the ideological and political education facing the new situation, The positive response of the new environment is the embodiment of its unique function in the field of social governance, the extension and expansion of its inherent functions. It is a manifestation of the conscious and purposeful expression of social governance into the scope of the value target of Ideological and political education. It is a structure composed of many functions. From the core level, it has an ideological integration work. Ability, value guiding function, moral education function and psychological dredging function; from the middle level, it has the function of interest adjustment, contradiction and dissolving function, conflict coordination function and vigor stimulating function. From the peripheral level, it can promote the equal dialogue of the governing body, supervise the implementation of the governance process and make up the insufficiency of the "rigid" governance means. The function of social public opinion collection and information feedback is rich in Ideological and political education and social governance in the classical Marx writers, the theoretical works of the Chinese Communists, ideological and political education, and the theory of public governance. It is realistic and urgent to play the social governance function of Ideological and political education. Based on the analysis and definition of "society" in social governance, in the period of social transformation, the field of social governance mainly concentrates on the five fields, such as "social cause reform", "social structure adjustment", "social public security", "social public opinion management" and "social life style". We should play a greater role in resolving various social contradictions, strengthening the construction of social morality and integrity system, maintaining social stability and safety of social ideology, and constantly satisfying the spiritual and cultural needs of the masses. This is a realistic task facing the social governance function of Ideological and political education. The effect of the treatment of education appears to be relatively weak and the effect of governance is not ideal. The reason is that the control thought in the process of Ideological and political education is obvious and deviates from the main purpose of social governance; the system of Ideological and political education is still unsound and hinders the implementation of social governance; from the view of the environment, the environment of Ideological and political education is complex and changeable. The difficulty of social governance has been increased. From the perspective of ways and means, the poor implementation of Ideological and political education has weakened the role of social governance. From the perspective of human factors, the ideological and political educators and educational objects present a lot of problems and affect the effect of social governance. In order to eliminate the influence of bad factors and form the resultant force of social governance, we should innovate the concept, realize the transformation of "management" to "governance", and deal with the relationship between stability and power, establish and improve the social governance mechanism of Ideological and political education, effectively resolve social contradictions, and carry out the special education and comprehensive analysis of the outstanding problems in the moral field. To strengthen the social atmosphere, to strengthen the social atmosphere, to strengthen the leading role of the socialist core values in social governance, to create a healthy social public opinion environment, to use a comprehensive and diverse carrier and method to improve the effectiveness of the social synergy; to cultivate the consciousness of the citizens of the modern society and to stimulate the social vitality. The research on the function of governance follows the logical line of "putting forward questions, analyzing problems and solving problems". The main method is literature research, interdisciplinary research and comparative study. On the basis of combing a large number of documents, the theory of social governance is introduced into the field of Ideological and political education, and the two are integrated and deeply divided. On the basis of defining the connotation and characteristics of "the social governance function of Ideological and political education", the two functions are classified and summarized, and the structure system of the social governance function of Ideological and political education is clearly demonstrated and the practical problems and influence of the social governance function of Ideological and political education are analyzed. On the basis of the factors, we found the breakthrough point to maximize the function of social governance in Ideological and political education, and strive to achieve the integration and innovation of the two.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D64
，

本文編號：1921252