發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-07-08 18:03

【摘要】：2014年6月,輕微刑事案件速裁程序在我國(guó)正式進(jìn)入試點(diǎn)。速裁程序的適用可以提高我國(guó)的司法效率,節(jié)約司法資源,解決案多人少的矛盾,并有利于對(duì)被追訴人權(quán)益的保障。本文以試點(diǎn)過(guò)程中的真實(shí)案件信息和辦理流程為依據(jù),通過(guò)考察國(guó)外的相關(guān)程序規(guī)定以及對(duì)我國(guó)速裁程序?qū)嵺`狀況各方面的客觀分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)速裁程序在制度規(guī)定和實(shí)踐應(yīng)用中的許多不合理不科學(xué)之處,并說(shuō)明其背后的原因,最后對(duì)程序的改進(jìn)和完善提出自己的建議,希望能對(duì)我國(guó)速裁程序的正式立法化構(gòu)建有所幫助。具體來(lái)說(shuō),本文主要分為五部分的內(nèi)容:引言部分首先介紹了刑事速裁制度的起源、發(fā)展和對(duì)程序的調(diào)研經(jīng)過(guò)。筆者先結(jié)合在人民檢察院實(shí)習(xí)的經(jīng)歷,后到刑事速裁制度首批試點(diǎn)的J市Z區(qū)人民法院和通過(guò)網(wǎng)絡(luò)等途徑收集了共120份真實(shí)的速裁案件材料。第一部分為我國(guó)輕微刑事案件速裁程序概述。本部分主要在理論上明確了我國(guó)速裁程序的概念、試點(diǎn)規(guī)則、建構(gòu)意義及與簡(jiǎn)易程序的異同,并簡(jiǎn)要介評(píng)了部分國(guó)外相關(guān)輕罪程序,認(rèn)為速裁程序在保證案件質(zhì)量的前提下,應(yīng)首要關(guān)注提高辦案速度,以達(dá)到司法效率與公正的最優(yōu)平衡。這是下文進(jìn)行實(shí)踐性研究的理論性基礎(chǔ)。第二部分是我國(guó)速裁程序的運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀及存在問(wèn)題。筆者通過(guò)收集真實(shí)的速裁程序卷宗材料和總結(jié)自己參與辦理速裁案件的經(jīng)驗(yàn)體會(huì),發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)試點(diǎn)的刑事速裁程序適用過(guò)程中存在對(duì)被追訴人、被害人權(quán)力保障力度不夠、律師援助流于形式、適用范圍、簡(jiǎn)化方式較為單一、速裁程序辦案用時(shí)依舊較長(zhǎng)等問(wèn)題。第三部分為我國(guó)速裁程序現(xiàn)存問(wèn)題的原因分析。刑事速裁程序試點(diǎn)運(yùn)行過(guò)程存在不足的原因主要表現(xiàn)為制度設(shè)計(jì)方面、司法操作層面和人為理念、法律文化背景四個(gè)方面的因素。第四部分是對(duì)我國(guó)速裁程序完善的建議。針對(duì)我國(guó)速裁程序試點(diǎn)中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題及原因,建議在現(xiàn)行試點(diǎn)規(guī)則的基礎(chǔ)上,完善我國(guó)的刑事速裁程序采取增加啟動(dòng)方式、擴(kuò)大適用范圍、豐富速裁程序的形式、統(tǒng)一速裁程序的尺度、建立權(quán)利保障和救濟(jì)措施等多種方式。
[Abstract]:In June 2014, the procedure of quick adjudication of minor criminal cases officially entered the pilot in our country. The application of quick adjudication procedure can improve the judicial efficiency of our country, save judicial resources, solve the contradiction of more cases and fewer people, and is beneficial to the protection of the rights and interests of the accused. Based on the real case information and handling process in the pilot process, through the investigation of the relevant procedural provisions abroad and the objective analysis of the practical situation of the express procedure in our country, this paper finds that there are many unreasonable and unscientific aspects in the system regulation and practical application of the express procedure in our country, explains the reasons behind it, and finally puts forward some suggestions for the improvement and perfection of the procedure. It is hoped that it can be helpful to the formal legislative construction of the speed-cutting procedure in our country. Specifically, this paper is divided into five parts: the introduction first introduces the origin, development and investigation of the procedure. Based on the experience of internship in the people's Procuratorate, the author collected a total of 120 real cases through the network and then to the Z District people's Court of J City, which was the first pilot of the criminal quick adjudication system. The first part is an overview of the procedure for the speedy adjudication of minor criminal cases in our country. This part mainly clarifies the concept, pilot rules, construction significance and similarities and differences with summary procedure in theory, and briefly comments on some foreign misdemeanour procedures, and holds that the quick adjudication procedure should pay more attention to improving the speed of handling cases under the premise of ensuring the quality of cases, so as to achieve the optimal balance between judicial efficiency and justice. This is the theoretical basis of practical research below. The second part is the operation status and existing problems of speed cutting program in our country. By collecting the real file materials of the speed cutting procedure and summing up the experience of participating in the handling of the case, the author finds that there are some problems in the application process of the trial criminal procedure in our country, such as the accused person, the victim power protection is not enough, the lawyer assistance is in the form, the scope of application, the simplification way is relatively single, the speed adjudication procedure is still used for a long time, and so on. The third part is the analysis of the reasons for the existing problems of the speed cutting procedure in our country. The main reasons for the deficiency of the pilot operation process of the criminal quick adjudication procedure are as follows: the system design, the judicial operation level and the human idea, and the legal and cultural background. The fourth part is the suggestion of perfecting the speed cutting procedure in our country. In view of the problems and causes in the pilot of the speed cutting procedure in our country, it is suggested that on the basis of the current pilot rules, the criminal speed cutting procedure in our country should be perfected by increasing the starting mode, expanding the scope of application, enriching the form of the speed cutting procedure, unifying the scale of the speed cutting procedure, and establishing the protection of rights and relief measures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邢永杰;;輕微刑事案件快速處理機(jī)制運(yùn)行模式、效果及存在的問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2009年01期

2 李海峰;蔣婕栩;祁穎;;農(nóng)村輕微刑事案件調(diào)查分析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2014年05期

3 楊光,于書(shū)峰;“被害人有證據(jù)證明的輕微刑事案件”訴權(quán)研究[J];人民檢察;2002年08期

4 郭宗才;對(duì)進(jìn)入公訴程序的輕微刑事案件的若干思考[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2005年02期

5 孟昭文;;依法快速辦理輕微刑事案件的實(shí)踐操作[J];人民檢察;2008年18期

6 尹東華;;輕微刑事案件快速審查機(jī)制的探索與實(shí)踐[J];天津市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年S1期

7 魏嫻;王萌;;認(rèn)罪輕微刑事案件相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究[J];管理觀察;2009年18期

8 福建省廈門(mén)市人民檢察院課題組;丁麗貞;郭彪;楊季隆;林明輝;盧舜凱;石華;;輕微刑事案件不捕、不訴工作機(jī)制的探索與完善[J];福建法學(xué);2009年02期

9 劉東海;張立強(qiáng);;試論構(gòu)建輕微刑事案件“捕訴合一”機(jī)制的必要性與可行性[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年28期

10 虞振威;;我國(guó)依法快速辦理輕微刑事案件機(jī)制的完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年36期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 高曉燕;;未成年人輕微刑事案件辦理機(jī)制探索[A];中國(guó)犯罪學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)第十八屆學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集（中冊(cè)）[C];2009年

2 楊克敏;;162例頭部損傷情況分析(摘要)[A];第四次全國(guó)法醫(yī)學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)論文集（上卷）[C];1991年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 郎寶生　通訊員　宋建軍 王存良 高利華;營(yíng)子區(qū)檢察院建立快速通道辦理輕微刑事案件[N];承德日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 邵宏偉;鐵鋒區(qū)檢察院建立快速辦理輕微刑事案件機(jī)制[N];黑龍江經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2010年

3 邵宏偉;建立實(shí)行快速辦理輕微刑事案件機(jī)制[N];黑龍江經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2010年

4 郭臣;輕微刑事案件快速辦理有了明確規(guī)定[N];烏海日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

5 于同志 北京市高級(jí)人民法院;輕微刑事案件快速辦理的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與啟示[N];人民法院報(bào);2014年

6 王太奇 謝亮;處理輕微刑事案件要力求社會(huì)良效[N];中國(guó)信息報(bào);2005年

7 ;最高人民檢察院關(guān)于依法快速辦理輕微刑事案件的意見(jiàn)[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

8 康輝　于巖君 彭玲;遠(yuǎn)程訊問(wèn)輕微刑事案件[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

9 陳益俊;上海虹口：輕微刑事案件 啟動(dòng)快辦機(jī)制[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

10 福建省龍海市檢察院 林志標(biāo)邋張小蝦;福建龍海：十項(xiàng)機(jī)制快速辦理輕微刑事案件[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張安敬;輕微刑事案件快速辦理機(jī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

2 楊飛;輕微刑事案件快速處理機(jī)制研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

3 鄭英超;輕微刑事案件快速處理機(jī)制探究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

4 王靜;論我國(guó)輕微刑事案件速?zèng)Q機(jī)制的構(gòu)建與完善[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

5 陳夢(mèng)佳;我國(guó)輕微刑事案件速裁程序的構(gòu)建[D];華南理工大學(xué);2015年

6 吳思遠(yuǎn);輕微刑事案件速裁程序研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

7 趙勤理;輕微刑事案件速裁機(jī)制探索[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

8 張獻(xiàn)召;輕微刑事案件快速辦理機(jī)制研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

9 楊龍鳳;我國(guó)輕微刑事案件快速辦理機(jī)制探究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2015年

10 劉嚴(yán)梅;輕微刑事案件速裁程序運(yùn)行狀況的調(diào)研報(bào)告[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2511773