發(fā)布時間：2019-04-02 19:24

【摘要】：死刑存廢爭論由來已久,近年來平反的諸多冤假錯案,使得這一爭論更加甚囂塵上。毋庸置疑,我國尚不具備完全廢除死刑的條件,但從陸續(xù)頒布的《刑法修正案(八)》、《刑法修正案(九)》可見我們國家在死刑制度上,積極審視以及努力變革。從合理性和現(xiàn)實性分析限制死刑制度,筆者認為以目前死刑被廢除是不現(xiàn)實的,但進一步死刑被限制適用在中國是必要的,也是切實可行的。我們應該從限制死刑適用的正當性及對象角度出發(fā),從立法、司法及監(jiān)督方面著手,從而嚴格控制死刑現(xiàn)階段在我國的適用。本文分為三個部分:第一部分,分析我國死刑限制適用的正當性,本章認為死刑限制符合我國刑法的目的性,對刑法總則對死刑的限制適用規(guī)定加以明晰探討,并對最新頒布的《刑法修正案(九)》中廢除死刑的部分條例加以合理分析;第二部分,本章認為我國的刑罰結(jié)構目前仍處于以死刑和自由刑為中心的重刑結(jié)構之列,而這種刑法結(jié)構導致目前我國死刑限制的局面極為尷尬。限制適用死刑對象分析、限制適用死刑標準分析、死緩制度與死刑限制適用的沖突、刑法結(jié)構不合理對死刑限制適用產(chǎn)生消極影響;第三部分為指導建議,本章認為我國刑法貫徹保留死刑、堅決少殺、防止錯殺的政策,適用死刑必須非常慎重,把判處死刑立即執(zhí)行的范圍縮小到最低限度。針對第二部分提出的沖突與消極影響,本章從完善死刑限制適用原則、完善死刑限制適用對象、擴大死緩制度的適用范圍、調(diào)整刑罰結(jié)構以及建立死刑限制適用的監(jiān)督體系方面進行分析,對完善我國死刑限制適用制度提出幾點建議。筆者運用諸多學術研究方法,得出本文結(jié)論,現(xiàn)階段,我國司法環(huán)境決定無法廢除死刑,為此我們要在實踐中,盡量減少和限制死刑,這是我們需要解決的,通過建立健全相關的措施,我們需要限制死刑,在本文中,筆者基于前人的研究結(jié)果,結(jié)合自己的看法,提出了幾個較為合理的觀點,筆者的愿望是希望我國死刑我國的死刑限制適用制度得到不斷完善,甚至在將來得以廢除死刑。
[Abstract]:Death penalty has a long-standing debate, in recent years, many wrongs and wrongs, make this argument even more. There is no doubt that our country still does not have the condition of abolishing the death penalty completely, but from the Criminal Law Amendment (8) and the Criminal Law Amendment (9) promulgated in succession, we can see that our country actively examines and strives to reform the death penalty system. From the analysis of rationality and reality, the author thinks that it is unrealistic to abolish the death penalty at present, but it is necessary and feasible to restrict the application of death penalty in China. We should start from the angle of restricting the legitimacy and object of the application of the death penalty, and proceed from the aspects of legislation, judicature and supervision, so as to strictly control the application of the death penalty at the present stage in our country. This article is divided into three parts: the first part, analyzes the legitimacy of the application of the death penalty restriction in our country, this chapter thinks that the death penalty restriction conforms to the purpose of our country's criminal law, and makes a clear discussion on the application provisions of the general provisions of the criminal law to the restriction on the death penalty. And to the latest Criminal Law Amendment (9) of the abolition of the death penalty in some regulations to make a reasonable analysis; In the second part, this chapter thinks that the penalty structure of our country is still in the heavy punishment structure centered on the death penalty and free punishment, and this kind of criminal law structure causes the situation of the death penalty restriction in our country to be very awkward at present. The analysis of the object of restricting the application of the death penalty, the analysis of the standard of restricting the application of the death penalty, the conflict between the system of reprieve of death and the application of the restriction of the death penalty, the unreasonable structure of the criminal law The third part is the guiding suggestion, this chapter holds that the criminal law of our country carries out the policy of retaining the death penalty, resolutely fewer killing and preventing the wrong killing. The application of the death penalty must be very careful, and the scope of the immediate execution of the death penalty must be narrowed to a minimum. In view of the conflict and negative influence put forward in the second part, this chapter from perfecting the application principle of the death penalty restriction, perfecting the application object of the death penalty restriction, expanding the scope of application of the death penalty reprieve system, This paper analyzes the adjustment of penalty structure and the establishment of supervision system for the application of death penalty restriction, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the application system of death penalty restriction in China. Using many academic research methods, the author draws the conclusion that at the present stage, the judicial environment in our country decides that the death penalty cannot be abolished. Therefore, we should reduce and limit the death penalty as far as possible in practice, which is what we need to solve. Through the establishment and improvement of related measures, we need to limit the death penalty. In this paper, based on the results of previous research, combined with my own views, I put forward several more reasonable points of view. The author hopes that our country's death penalty restriction system will be improved and even abolished in the future.
【學位授予單位】：江西財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2018
【分類號】：D924.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 張躍華;略論死緩制度的缺陷[J];紹興文理學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年05期

2 趙秉志,肖中華;論死刑的立法控制[J];中國法學;1998年01期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 張磊;死刑功能論[D];河南大學;2004年

，

本文編號：2452853