【摘要】：隱私權(quán)作為一項最基本的人格權(quán),是每個人都平等享有的,隱私權(quán)是近代才被提出的一個法學概念,存在的時間并不是很久,但是各國相關(guān)法律發(fā)展的速度卻是十分驚人的,各個國家對隱私權(quán)都有了不同程度的保護。而我國也對隱私權(quán)進行了法律保護,但是卻沒有作為一項專門的法律進行規(guī)制,其中在憲法中提到了隱私權(quán)的保護,在侵權(quán)責任法中第二條保護民事權(quán)益當中包括了隱私權(quán),民法中關(guān)于人格權(quán)的保護也包括了隱私權(quán),其他法律沒有對隱私權(quán)的保護做更多的解釋。家庭作為傳統(tǒng)意義中最基本的單位,特別是夫妻間作為最親近的關(guān)系,受到婚姻法配偶權(quán)中忠誠義務的影響,一直以來,傳統(tǒng)觀念認為夫妻之間是不存在隱私權(quán)的,所以夫妻間的隱私權(quán)一直被夫妻間的忠誠義務所覆蓋,產(chǎn)生了很多社會問題,本文希望通過對夫妻間隱私權(quán)相關(guān)的案例的分析,從實踐的角度加上理論的剖析,對夫妻間的隱私權(quán)的保護進行探討,明確夫妻間忠誠義務和隱私權(quán)的關(guān)系,為解決夫妻間關(guān)于隱私權(quán)的問題提供一種思路。本文的第一部分列舉了兩個不同的關(guān)于夫妻間隱私權(quán)的司法判例,通過對夫妻間隱私權(quán)不同情況的分析,確定隱私權(quán)在夫妻間的地位,并且以案例為指引,提出案例中存在的問題,以便下文可以對相關(guān)問題進行理論的論述和解釋,進一步明確夫妻間忠誠義務和隱私權(quán)的關(guān)系。本文的第二部分從理論的角度界定了隱私和隱私權(quán)的概念,從法理學的角度明確夫妻間是應該存在隱私權(quán)的,對夫妻間隱私權(quán)的保護做出進一步的判斷,主要從夫妻間個人的身體健康情況,夫妻間的財產(chǎn)狀況,夫妻間的通訊秘密以及夫妻間個人領(lǐng)域的事物。從分類學的角度界定夫妻間隱私權(quán)的類型,主要包括夫妻間個人隱私和夫妻共同隱私,做好基礎(chǔ)理論工作。本文的第三部分集中表述了夫妻間隱私權(quán)與其他權(quán)利的沖突原理進行分析,主要以夫妻間知情權(quán)為對象,整理了夫妻間知情權(quán)的概念以及其基本理論,針對夫妻間知情權(quán)以及隱私權(quán)分別進行了總結(jié)和整理,并且對夫妻間隱私權(quán)和關(guān)于通訊秘密知情權(quán)和身體狀況知情權(quán)之沖突做了分析,并且提出相應的協(xié)調(diào)方案。本文的第四部分通過對一些發(fā)達國家關(guān)于隱私權(quán)以及夫妻間隱私權(quán)確立和發(fā)展歷程的整理和論述,希望借鑒到部分發(fā)達國家關(guān)于隱私權(quán)的一些理論和制度,對構(gòu)建和完善我國相關(guān)法律制度提供一些可行之路。本文的第五部分主要是針對司法案例、媒體實例中提到的一些問題以及理論分析中提出的一些建議進行綜合匯總,提出關(guān)于夫妻間隱私權(quán)保護的相關(guān)制度的構(gòu)建,從不同的角度對夫妻間隱私權(quán)進行規(guī)范,從理論和實踐的雙重角度提出一些保護夫妻間隱私權(quán)的具體建議,對夫妻間隱私權(quán)的保護進行詳盡的制度構(gòu)建。
[Abstract]:The right to privacy, as the most basic right of personality, is enjoyed equally by everyone. The right to privacy is a legal concept that has been put forward in modern times, and it has not existed for a long time, but the speed of the development of relevant laws in various countries is very striking. The right to privacy has been protected to varying degrees in various countries. Our country also carries on the legal protection to the right of privacy, but does not have as a special law carries on the regulation, among them mentioned the right of privacy protection in the constitution, in the tort liability law the second protection civil rights and interests included the right of privacy, The protection of personality rights in civil law also includes the right to privacy, other laws do not explain the protection of privacy. The family, as the most basic unit in the traditional sense, especially the relationship between husband and wife, is influenced by the loyalty obligation in the spouse right of the Marriage Law. Therefore, the right of privacy between husband and wife has been covered by the loyalty obligation between husband and wife, which has caused many social problems. This paper hopes to analyze the cases related to the right to privacy between husband and wife, and to add theoretical analysis from the perspective of practice. This paper probes into the protection of the right of privacy between husband and wife, clarifies the relationship between the obligation of loyalty and the right of privacy between husband and wife, and provides a way to solve the problem of privacy between husband and wife. The first part of this paper lists two different judicial precedents on the right to privacy between husband and wife. Through the analysis of the different circumstances of the right of privacy between husband and wife, it determines the status of the right of privacy between husband and wife, and takes the case as the guide. The problems in the case are put forward so that the related problems can be discussed and explained theoretically, and the relationship between the loyalty obligation and the right of privacy between husband and wife can be further clarified. The second part of this paper defines the concepts of privacy and privacy from a theoretical point of view, defines the right of privacy between husband and wife from the perspective of jurisprudence, and makes a further judgment on the protection of privacy between husband and wife. Mainly from the couple's personal health, marital property status, husband and wife's communication secrets, and the couple's personal field of affairs. This paper defines the types of privacy between husband and wife from the perspective of taxonomy, including personal privacy and common privacy of husband and wife, and does a good job in basic theory. The third part of this paper focuses on the analysis of the conflict principle between the right to privacy and other rights between husband and wife, mainly taking the right to know between husband and wife as the object, sorting out the concept of the right to know between husband and wife and its basic theory. This paper summarizes and arranges the right to know and the right to privacy between husband and wife, and analyzes the conflict between the right to privacy and the right to know about the secret communication and the right to know about the state of the body, and puts forward the corresponding coordination scheme. In the fourth part of this paper, the author tries to draw lessons from some theories and systems of privacy in some developed countries by arranging and discussing the establishment and development of the right to privacy in some developed countries, as well as the establishment and development of the right of privacy between husband and wife. To construct and perfect our country relevant legal system to provide some feasible way. The fifth part of this paper mainly aims at the judicial cases, some problems mentioned in the media examples and some suggestions put forward in the theoretical analysis, and puts forward the construction of the relevant system on the protection of the right to privacy between husband and wife. From different angles to regulate the right of privacy between husband and wife, from the perspective of theory and practice to put forward some specific suggestions to protect the right of privacy between husband and wife, and to build a detailed system for the protection of the right of privacy between husband and wife.
【學位授予單位】：河南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.9

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王利明;;論個人信息權(quán)的法律保護——以個人信息權(quán)與隱私權(quán)的界分為中心[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2013年04期

2 王利明;;隱私權(quán)概念的再界定[J];法學家;2012年01期

3 魏曉陽;;日本隱私權(quán)的憲法保護及其對中國的啟示[J];浙江學刊;2012年01期

4 馬艷華;;夫妻間知情權(quán)與隱私權(quán)的沖突與平衡[J];寧波大學學報(人文科學版);2011年05期

5 張黎利;;婚內(nèi)隱私權(quán)與知情權(quán)的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2011年02期

6 肖穎;;論隱私權(quán)的法律保護[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2011年04期

7 張新寶;;我國隱私權(quán)保護法律制度的發(fā)展[J];國家檢察官學院學報;2010年02期

8 王坤;;隱私權(quán)的邊界——一種基于平衡的視角[J];前沿;2009年06期

9 王利明;;隱私權(quán)的新發(fā)展[J];人大法律評論;2009年01期

10 王澤鑒;;人格權(quán)的具體化及其保護范圍·隱私權(quán)篇(下)[J];比較法研究;2009年02期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前5條

1 王sヨ，

本文編號：2123012