本文選題：單位犯罪 + 刑事責(zé)任　； 參考：《廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著單位違法犯罪現(xiàn)象頻發(fā),1979年我國(guó)在《刑法中》規(guī)定了單位犯罪,新刑法后的修正案也不斷的對(duì)單位犯罪進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充和修改,單位犯罪立法也越受重視,刑法學(xué)界關(guān)于單位犯罪理論問(wèn)題的討論也愈激烈。單位犯罪刑事責(zé)任是單位犯罪相關(guān)理論中重要一環(huán),對(duì)單位犯罪刑事責(zé)任進(jìn)行討論極具理論和實(shí)踐意義。然而,目前我國(guó)刑法學(xué)界對(duì)于單位犯罪刑事責(zé)任問(wèn)題研究雖然眾多,但并沒(méi)有形成一致觀(guān)點(diǎn),尤其是關(guān)于單位犯罪刑事責(zé)任的依據(jù)是什么?單位犯罪應(yīng)當(dāng)如何適用刑罰?關(guān)于單位犯罪刑事責(zé)任及處罰的探討,對(duì)于我國(guó)單位犯罪的理論和實(shí)踐都具有重大價(jià)值。本文在參考相關(guān)理論資料和立法狀況的基礎(chǔ)上,試圖從刑事責(zé)任以及刑事處罰的角度對(duì)單位犯罪制度進(jìn)行探析,并為將來(lái)可能的立法完善提出幾點(diǎn)建議。全文共分為以下三章:第一章,單位犯罪刑事責(zé)任概述。通過(guò)對(duì)單位犯罪以及刑事責(zé)任兩者概念的解讀,對(duì)單位犯罪刑事責(zé)任概念下定義。對(duì)比自然人犯罪,總結(jié)單位犯罪刑事責(zé)任具有“法律擬制性”和“雙重性”的特征。接著闡述外國(guó)單位犯罪刑事責(zé)任理論,主要是對(duì)英美法系和大陸法系的相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行列舉并分析其優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)。其后列舉了我國(guó)刑法學(xué)界的六種觀(guān)點(diǎn),并進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析,闡述贊同主體復(fù)合論的理由。第二章,單位犯罪的刑事處罰制度。分析了現(xiàn)代刑法對(duì)單位犯罪的兩種主要處罰方式,即單罰制和雙罰制,對(duì)兩者進(jìn)行對(duì)比,并且認(rèn)為雙罰制更加科學(xué)和公正。其后探討了自首、累犯、緩刑及追訴制度在單位犯罪中適用的問(wèn)題。贊同單位能夠成立一般自首,但不能成立特別自首;認(rèn)為對(duì)單位確定累犯制度缺乏必要性,但是不影響對(duì)單位直接責(zé)任人員的累犯認(rèn)定;同時(shí)建議對(duì)單位建立緩刑及追訴制度,并提出理由和具體內(nèi)容。第三章,完善我國(guó)單位處罰制度。建議我國(guó)建立適合單位的刑罰體系,以此為基礎(chǔ),并參考其他國(guó)家的相關(guān)規(guī)定。在完善單位處罰制度的內(nèi)容中,提出以下建議:取消單罰制,對(duì)只處罰直接責(zé)任人員的規(guī)定進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充,增加對(duì)單位的處罰;細(xì)化罰金刑內(nèi)容,增加可操作性;增設(shè)資格性,完善對(duì)單位處罰手段。最后在對(duì)完善單位直接責(zé)任人員刑罰制度的建議中,提出我國(guó)刑法需要平衡單位犯罪責(zé)任人員的主刑適用以及完善直接責(zé)任人員的罰金刑。
[Abstract]:With the frequent occurrence of unit crime, in 1979, our country stipulated unit crime in "Criminal Law", and the amendment after the new Criminal Law continuously supplemented and modified the unit crime, and the legislation of unit crime was paid more attention to. The discussion on the theory of unit crime in the field of criminal law is more intense. The criminal liability of unit crime is an important part in the theory of unit crime. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to discuss the criminal liability of unit crime. However, although there are many researches on the criminal liability of unit crime in the criminal law circle of our country at present, there is no consistent view, especially what is the basis of the criminal liability of unit crime? How should the punishment be applied to the unit crime? The discussion on the criminal responsibility and punishment of unit crime is of great value to the theory and practice of unit crime in our country. On the basis of reference to relevant theoretical data and legislative situation, this paper attempts to analyze the system of unit crime from the angle of criminal responsibility and criminal punishment, and puts forward some suggestions for the possible legislative perfection in the future. The full text is divided into the following three chapters: the first chapter, unit crime criminal liability overview. By interpreting the concepts of unit crime and criminal responsibility, this paper defines the concept of unit crime criminal responsibility. Compared with natural person crime, the criminal liability of unit crime has the characteristics of "legal fiction" and "duality". Then it expounds the criminal liability theory of foreign unit crime, mainly enumerates and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the related theories of Anglo-American law system and civil law system. Then it enumerates the six viewpoints of the criminal law circle in our country, and carries on the contrast analysis, elaborates the reason which agrees with the subject compound theory. Chapter two, the criminal punishment system of unit crime. This paper analyzes two main forms of punishment for unit crime in modern criminal law, that is, single penalty system and double penalty system, compares them, and thinks that double penalty system is more scientific and just. Then it discusses the application of surrender, recidivism, probation and prosecution system in unit crime. Agreeing that a unit can establish a general voluntary surrender, but not establishing a special voluntary surrender; considering that it is not necessary to determine the recidivism system for the unit, but not affecting the determination of recidivism to the personnel directly responsible for the unit; and at the same time recommending the establishment of a probation and prosecution system for the unit. And put forward the reasons and specific content. The third chapter, perfect our country unit punishment system. It is suggested that our country should establish a penalty system suitable for the unit, on this basis, and refer to the relevant provisions of other countries. In perfecting the content of unit punishment system, the following suggestions are put forward: to cancel the single penalty system, to supplement the stipulation of punishing only the persons directly responsible, to increase the punishment to the unit, to refine the content of the fine punishment, to increase the maneuverability, to add the qualification, We will improve the means of punishment for units. Finally, in the suggestion of perfecting the penalty system of unit direct responsibility personnel, the author points out that the criminal law of our country needs to balance the application of the principal punishment of the unit criminal responsibility personnel and the perfection of the fine penalty of the direct responsibility personnel.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張紹謙;我國(guó)法人犯罪立法的思考[J];法學(xué);1995年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2049983