本文選題：無名氏 + 無主財(cái)產(chǎn)��； 參考：《沈陽師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文所說“無名氏”是指在交通肇事中遭受侵害死亡、交警部門在用盡多種方法查找之后仍不能確定其身份信息的人。在我國,“無名氏”作為一個(gè)自然人,生命權(quán)必然受我國法律的保護(hù)。但是,因當(dāng)前我國中央立法的缺失,在交通肇事造成“無名氏”死亡之后由誰向侵權(quán)人主張權(quán)利、其死亡賠償金的具體計(jì)算及處置方法等都是當(dāng)前我國司法實(shí)務(wù)中亟需解決的難題。本文擬通過典型案例分析的方法由案例引出問題,通過四個(gè)真實(shí)案例分別體現(xiàn)交通肇事“無名氏”死亡損害賠償案件中存在的問題,并針對(duì)存在的問題進(jìn)提出解決辦法。本文第一部分是由案例引出問題。通過四個(gè)案例,分別引出“無名氏”死亡損害賠償案件中存在的原告資格及其死亡賠償金的計(jì)算和處置問題。本文第二部分主要是解決交通肇事“無名氏”死亡損害賠償案件中的原告資格�！盁o名氏”死者因身份信息不明,無法確定繼承人或者近親屬,死亡賠償金處于無主狀態(tài),成為無主財(cái)產(chǎn),上交國家,成為公產(chǎn)。根據(jù)公產(chǎn)代管理論,行政主體對(duì)其享有所有權(quán)或者管理權(quán)。在中央立法沒有規(guī)定的情況下,依據(jù)當(dāng)前規(guī)范性文件的規(guī)定,原告資格在民政部門和救助基金管理機(jī)構(gòu)之間存在著分歧。因救助基金管理機(jī)構(gòu)不具有行政主體資格,而民政部門具有行政主體資格,所以本文支持民政部門作原告。本文第三部分是解決“無名氏”死亡賠償金的計(jì)算標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和處置。對(duì)于死亡賠償金的計(jì)算問題,筆者認(rèn)為對(duì)“無名氏”受害人應(yīng)按城鎮(zhèn)人口標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、年齡取法醫(yī)鑒定的中間值計(jì)算。依據(jù)是2005年《道路交通事故處理工作規(guī)范》七十四條,對(duì)未知名死者的人身損害賠償,其身份暫按城鎮(zhèn)居民計(jì)算,年齡暫按法醫(yī)鑒定報(bào)告的大約年齡段取中間年齡記算。同時(shí)這一規(guī)定也得到了地方立法的支持。至于處置問題上文分析確定了民政部門對(duì)此類財(cái)產(chǎn)的保護(hù)職責(zé),享有作為原告的權(quán)利,據(jù)此,應(yīng)由民政部門設(shè)立賬戶對(duì)“無名氏”死者的死亡賠償金進(jìn)行管理。
[Abstract]:In this paper, "Anonymous" refers to a person whose identity information can not be determined by the traffic police department after being injured and killed in a traffic accident. In our country, Anonymous as a natural person, the right to life must be protected by our law. However, due to the current lack of central legislation in our country, who claims the rights of the infringer after the death of the "Anonymous" caused by the traffic accident, The concrete calculation and disposal method of its death compensation is a difficult problem that needs to be solved in the judicial practice of our country at present. Through the method of typical case analysis, this paper draws the question from the case, and through four real cases respectively reflects the existing problems in the death and damage compensation case of "unknown person" in traffic accident, and puts forward the solution to the existing problem. The first part of this paper is to draw the question from the case. Through four cases, the problems of the plaintiff's qualification and the calculation and disposal of the death compensation in Anonymous's death compensation case are introduced respectively. The second part of this paper is to solve the plaintiff's qualification in the death compensation case of traffic accident. Because of the unknown identity information, the "anonymous" deceased can not determine the heirs or close relatives, the death compensation is in the state of no owner, becomes the property of no owner, turns over to the state, and becomes a public property. According to the theory of public property escrow, the administrative subject has the right of ownership or management. In the absence of the central legislation, according to the provisions of the current normative documents, the plaintiff's qualifications are divided between the civil affairs department and the administrative organ of the rescue fund. Because the administrative organization of the rescue fund does not have the qualification of the administrative subject, and the civil affairs department has the qualification of the administrative subject, this paper supports the civil affairs department as the plaintiff. The third part of this paper is to solve the "anonymous" death compensation standard and disposal. For the calculation of death compensation, the author thinks that the victim of "Anonymous's" should be calculated according to the standard of urban population and the median value of forensic identification according to the standard of urban population. According to the 74 items of road traffic accident handling work standard in 2005, the status of the unnamed dead person compensation is calculated according to the urban residents temporarily, and the age is calculated according to the middle age of the forensic medical examination report. At the same time, this provision has also been supported by local legislation. As for the disposal, the above analysis determines the duty of the civil affairs department to protect such property and enjoy the right to be the plaintiff. Accordingly, the civil affairs department should set up an account to manage the compensation for the death of the "anonymous" deceased.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923;D922.14

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 趙文燕;;關(guān)于交通肇事案件中死亡無名氏索賠主體問題——兼評(píng)《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法司法解釋建議稿》第二十六條[J];吉林工商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期

2 吳云;陳長(zhǎng)權(quán);;撞死無名氏 司機(jī)賠償遇尷尬[J];中國審判;2013年11期

3 謝文哲;宋春龍;;當(dāng)事人適格問題的理論分析與反思——兼論我國當(dāng)事人適格制度的重構(gòu)[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年05期

4 齊樹潔;;我國公益訴訟主體之界定——兼論公益訴訟當(dāng)事人適格之?dāng)U張[J];河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期

5 朱孝彥;;交通事故中身份不明死者的賠償問題新探[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

6 郭曉清;;論交通事故中無名氏受害人死亡賠償處理[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2011年14期

7 石春玲;;無近親屬受害人之死亡賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

8 李華斌;高研;;國內(nèi)首例民政局作為原告的損害賠償案[J];中國審判;2006年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 楊國亮;;無名氏死亡賠償金賠給誰？[N];中國保險(xiǎn)報(bào);2015年

2 余香成;胡小衛(wèi);;救助基金代無名氏索賠 訴訟主體不適格被駁回[N];中國保險(xiǎn)報(bào);2012年

3 ;探尋地震災(zāi)后無主財(cái)產(chǎn)的法律解決途徑[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李迪昕;無主財(cái)產(chǎn)法律問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

2 熊洋;民事訴訟當(dāng)事人適格問題研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2012年

3 孔令章;訴之利益研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 張銳銳;行政公產(chǎn)監(jiān)管的法律研究[D];云南大學(xué);2015年

2 管仁亮;公益訴訟當(dāng)事人適格問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

3 王瑕;論我國經(jīng)濟(jì)公益訴訟的訴訟提起與適格[D];南昌大學(xué);2011年

4 呂奇文;論死者近親屬缺位之民事起訴主體[D];廣西大學(xué);2011年

5 張霄霄;交通事故損害賠償案件之當(dāng)事人適格問題[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

6 次登羅布;論死亡賠償金的性質(zhì)[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

7 王燕;當(dāng)事人適格問題理論研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

8 胡明言;行政公產(chǎn)若干法律問題研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2033077