本文選題：專家輔助人 + 鑒定人��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著科技社會(huì)的不斷發(fā)展，專業(yè)分工呈現(xiàn)出越來(lái)越細(xì)致化、多元化的趨勢(shì)，這種改變影響著社會(huì)的各個(gè)領(lǐng)域、各個(gè)層面，也給民事訴訟的改革帶來(lái)了新的課題。一方面，由于大量高技術(shù)、新領(lǐng)域的專業(yè)性問(wèn)題進(jìn)入到民事訴訟領(lǐng)域中，使得相對(duì)缺乏專業(yè)知識(shí)儲(chǔ)備的法官越來(lái)越依賴于鑒定結(jié)論的判斷。另一方面，我國(guó)民事訴訟在改革過(guò)程中一直致力于推進(jìn)當(dāng)事人雙方的訴訟對(duì)抗，維護(hù)訴訟均衡。兩者在民事訴訟運(yùn)行的過(guò)程中不可避免的發(fā)生了矛盾，如何解決這一沖突，在充分保護(hù)當(dāng)事人訴訟法上的正當(dāng)權(quán)利和實(shí)體法上的合法利益的同時(shí)，幫助法官認(rèn)定事實(shí)，居中公正裁判，成為了民事訴訟中公正裁判的瓶頸。 2001年，最高人民法院以司法解釋的形式在我國(guó)民事訴訟中確立了專家輔助人制度。該制度的出臺(tái)為我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中的種種難題提供了新的思路。但由于我國(guó)在立法上并沒(méi)有對(duì)該制度進(jìn)行全面、系統(tǒng)的規(guī)定，一些理論問(wèn)題又未得到明確的定位，導(dǎo)致實(shí)務(wù)操作中該制度的運(yùn)行面臨種種障礙，因此有必要對(duì)我國(guó)民事訴訟中的專家輔助人制度進(jìn)行深入的分析。本文共分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分是專家輔助人制度的概述。首先介紹了我國(guó)設(shè)立專家輔助人制度的背景，并在此基礎(chǔ)上分析了我國(guó)確立該制度的主要原因。之后，通過(guò)對(duì)比專家輔助人與我國(guó)民事訴訟中的其他訴訟參與人，分析了專家輔助人在我國(guó)民事訴訟中的地位。 第二部分是專家輔助人制度在我國(guó)運(yùn)行的現(xiàn)狀及其存在的問(wèn)題。該部分首先介紹了我國(guó)民事訴訟中專家輔助人制度的主要框架。之后，，通過(guò)對(duì)專家輔助人在我國(guó)民事訴訟司法實(shí)踐中運(yùn)行情況的分析，總結(jié)了專家輔助人制度設(shè)立后對(duì)我國(guó)民事訴訟的積極意義及該制度現(xiàn)存在的主要問(wèn)題。 第三部分是域外相關(guān)制度的考察與評(píng)析。該部分介紹了意大利的技術(shù)顧問(wèn)制度和日本的訴訟輔佐人制度。通過(guò)將我國(guó)民事訴訟中專家輔助人制度與域外相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行一定的比較研究，通過(guò)比較更客觀認(rèn)識(shí)了我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的專家輔助人制度，并為之后的完善提供了更多可參考的思路。 第四部分是完善我國(guó)民事訴訟專家輔助人制度的構(gòu)想。通過(guò)上文的分析主要在專家輔助人的地位、資格、參加訴訟的程序、其權(quán)利、義務(wù)及責(zé)任、專家意見(jiàn)的效力及審查，其他保障性措施等方面進(jìn)行了探討，以期能夠?qū)ξ覈?guó)民事訴訟中專家輔助人制度的完善提供一些思路。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology society, professional division of labor is becoming more and more meticulous and diversified. This kind of change affects all fields and levels of the society, and also brings a new subject to the reform of civil litigation. On the one hand, due to a large number of high technology, the professional problems in the new field into the field of civil litigation, making the relative lack of professional knowledge reserve judges rely more and more on the judgment of the expert conclusions. On the other hand, in the process of reform, civil litigation in China has been committed to promoting the litigant confrontation between the parties and maintaining the balance of litigation. There is an inevitable contradiction between the two in the course of the operation of civil proceedings. How to resolve this conflict and fully protect the legitimate rights of the parties in the procedural law and the legitimate interests of the substantive law, at the same time help the judge to determine the facts, In 2001, the Supreme people's Court established the system of expert assistant in civil litigation in the form of judicial interpretation. The introduction of this system provides a new way of thinking for all kinds of difficult problems in judicial practice in our country. But because our country has not carried on the comprehensive, systematic stipulation to this system in the legislation, some theoretical problems have not been clearly positioned, resulting in the practical operation of the system facing various obstacles. Therefore, it is necessary to make a deep analysis of the expert assistant system in civil litigation in our country. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of the expert assistant system. Firstly, the background of setting up the expert assistant system in our country is introduced, and the main reasons for the establishment of the system in our country are analyzed. After that, by comparing the expert assistant and other litigant participants in our civil action, the author analyzes the position of the expert assistant in the civil action in our country. The second part is the current situation and existing problems of expert assistant system in our country. This part first introduces the main framework of the expert assistant system in civil litigation in our country. After that, through the analysis of the operation of the expert assistant in the judicial practice of civil litigation in our country, this paper summarizes the positive significance of the expert assistant system to the civil litigation in our country and the main problems existing in the system. The third part is the investigation and evaluation of the relevant system. This part introduces the technical adviser system in Italy and the litigation assistant system in Japan. Through the comparative study of the system of expert auxiliaries and foreign related systems in civil litigation in China, this paper makes a more objective understanding of the existing system of expert auxiliaries in our country, and provides more ideas for further improvement. The fourth part is the idea of perfecting the system of expert assistant in civil litigation in our country. Through the above analysis, the status, qualifications, procedures, rights, obligations and responsibilities of the expert auxiliaries, their rights, obligations and responsibilities, the effectiveness and review of expert opinions, and other safeguards are discussed. In order to provide some ideas for the perfection of the expert assistant system in civil litigation in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 袁曉燕;論我國(guó)刑事訴訟專家輔助人制度之完善[D];廣東商學(xué)院;2013年

本文編號(hào)：2025900