本文選題：有效辯護(hù) + 辯護(hù)權(quán)�。� 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：有效辯護(hù)有廣義和狹義之分,廣義的有效辯護(hù)要求犯罪嫌疑人、被告人和律師不僅享有充分有效的辯護(hù)權(quán),還要求保障辯護(hù)權(quán)行使的司法制度健全完善,例如,法律援助制度、律師執(zhí)業(yè)保障制度、律師辯護(hù)質(zhì)量控制體系等等;狹義的有效辯護(hù)要求律師為被追訴人提供忠誠、勤勉的法律服務(wù),保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的訴訟權(quán)利免受不應(yīng)有的侵犯,保證公正審判的實(shí)現(xiàn)。有效辯護(hù)與無效辯護(hù)并不是對立的概念,無效辯護(hù)是對律師不盡職行為的否定評價,并且會發(fā)生以訴訟方式撤銷原判決的法律后果。2012年我國《刑事訴訟法》修改之后,在辯護(hù)制度方面取得了較大的進(jìn)步,不僅規(guī)定了辯護(hù)律師可以在偵查階段介入訴訟程序,而且完善了辯護(hù)律師的會見權(quán)、閱卷權(quán)、通信權(quán),加強(qiáng)了律師的執(zhí)業(yè)保障,擴(kuò)大了法律援助的范圍。在整個刑事訴訟的過程中,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人申請回避的權(quán)利、使用本民族語言文字進(jìn)行訴訟的權(quán)利、被及時告知逮捕理由的權(quán)利等均是由辯護(hù)權(quán)衍生而來,刑事訴訟中的其他權(quán)利皆與辯護(hù)權(quán)密切相關(guān),賦予犯罪嫌疑人、被告人辯護(hù)權(quán)是其獲得公正判決的前提。通過研究外國的制度,對比國際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的辯護(hù)權(quán)的內(nèi)容,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)我國的辯護(hù)制度仍然存在很多問題,例如偵查階段辯護(hù)權(quán)有限,審判階段辯護(hù)質(zhì)量不高、律師執(zhí)業(yè)保障制度不健全等等。但應(yīng)當(dāng)肯定,我國的刑事訴訟在尊重和保障人權(quán)的任務(wù)指導(dǎo)下已經(jīng)向前邁進(jìn)了一大步。我國應(yīng)當(dāng)在現(xiàn)有辯護(hù)制度的基礎(chǔ)上,以廣義的有效辯護(hù)理論為指導(dǎo),參照英美法系、大陸法系的有效辯護(hù),繼續(xù)完善我國的辯護(hù)制度。
[Abstract]:Effective defense is divided into broad and narrow sense. Effective defense in a broad sense requires criminal suspects, defendants and lawyers not only to enjoy the full and effective right of defence, but also to ensure the sound and sound judicial system of the exercise of the right to defence, such as the legal aid system, In the narrow sense, effective defense requires lawyers to provide loyal and diligent legal services to the accused, to protect the rights of criminal suspects and defendants from undue infringement. To ensure a fair trial. Effective defense and invalid defense are not opposite concepts. Invalid defense is a negative evaluation of lawyer's misconduct, and the legal consequences of annulling the original judgment by way of lawsuit will occur. After the revision of our country's Criminal procedure Law in 2012, Great progress has been made in the defense system, not only by stipulating that defense lawyers can intervene in the proceedings during the investigation stage, but also by perfecting the rights of meeting, marking and correspondence of defense lawyers, and strengthening the protection of lawyers' practice. The scope of legal aid has been expanded. During the whole process of criminal proceedings, the rights of criminal suspects and defendants to apply for recusal, the right to use the language of their own nationality for litigation, and the right to be informed of the reasons for arrest in time are all derived from the right of defence. Other rights in criminal proceedings are closely related to the right of defense. By studying foreign systems and comparing the contents of the right to defense in international standards, we can find that there are still many problems in our defence system, such as the limited right to defense in the investigation stage and the poor quality of the defence in the trial stage. Lawyer practice security system is not perfect and so on. But it should be affirmed that China's criminal procedure has made great strides under the guidance of the task of respecting and protecting human rights. On the basis of the existing defense system, our country should continue to perfect the defense system of our country under the guidance of the generalized effective defense theory, referring to the effective defense of the common law system and the civil law system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳光中;唐彬彬;;深化司法改革與刑事訴訟法修改的若干重點(diǎn)問題探討[J];比較法研究;2016年06期

2 張杰;;改進(jìn)律師閱卷制度的理性思考——以庭審實(shí)質(zhì)化為視角[J];中國律師;2016年10期

3 陳瑞華;;“認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬”改革的理論反思——基于刑事速裁程序運(yùn)行經(jīng)驗(yàn)的考察[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2016年04期

4 祁建建;;美國辯訴交易中的有效辯護(hù)權(quán)[J];比較法研究;2015年06期

5 龍宗智;;庭審實(shí)質(zhì)化的路徑和方法[J];法學(xué)研究;2015年05期

6 閔春雷;;以審判為中心:內(nèi)涵解讀及實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2015年03期

7 顧永忠;楊劍煒;;我國刑事法律援助的實(shí)施現(xiàn)狀與對策建議——基于2013年《刑事訴訟法》施行以來的考察與思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2015年04期

8 熊秋紅;;有效辯護(hù)、無效辯護(hù)的國際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和本土化思考[J];中國刑事法雜志;2014年06期

9 陳瑞華;;刑事訴訟中的有效辯護(hù)問題[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2014年05期

10 汪家寶;;論中國刑事司法語境下的有效辯護(hù)問題[J];河南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年05期

，

本文編號：1985292