本文選題：終身監(jiān)禁 + 貪污受賄��； 參考：《河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：終身監(jiān)禁制度是由西方“l(fā)ife imprisonment”翻譯而來。2015年,我國《刑法修正案(九)》第383條第一次將終身監(jiān)禁寫入我國法律條文。從世界范圍來看,終身監(jiān)禁制度有兩種類型:一是可以假釋的終身監(jiān)禁;二是不可假釋的終身監(jiān)禁。在不同的國家規(guī)定不盡相同。我國終身監(jiān)禁制度只適用于貪污受賄罪且不可減刑、假釋。本文從終身監(jiān)禁制度的起源開始介紹,將國外終身監(jiān)禁制度和我國進(jìn)行了對比,分析了該制度在我國的現(xiàn)狀和爭議,對該制度的完善提出了自己的建議。論文主體由四部分構(gòu)成。第一部分是對終身監(jiān)禁制度的概述。介紹了該制度的概念、特征和種類。從該制度起源開始談起,追溯到了貝卡里亞第一次提出的死刑存廢,并指出終身監(jiān)禁并不只有其表面上所表示出的意思,即終身不得獲取自由。在不同國家,還存在可以減刑、假釋的終身監(jiān)禁制度。除了介紹該制度的起源和其他國家的現(xiàn)狀,對我國不可減刑、假釋的終身監(jiān)禁制度也作出了重點(diǎn)介紹,并分析了該制度和無期徒刑之間的關(guān)系。在該部分的最后對終身監(jiān)禁制度的種類進(jìn)行了介紹,包括有假釋的終身監(jiān)禁和無假釋的終身監(jiān)禁兩種類型。第二部分是與終身監(jiān)禁制度相關(guān)的比較法研究。我國終身監(jiān)禁制度剛剛起步,尚處于萌芽狀態(tài),還存在很多不足之處。而西方國家的終身監(jiān)禁制度較為成熟,本章通過對歐洲國家和美國終身監(jiān)禁制度對比研究,借鑒他們的優(yōu)勢,進(jìn)一步完善我國終身監(jiān)禁制度。第三部分是對我國終身監(jiān)禁制度現(xiàn)狀和爭議的闡述。我國關(guān)于終身監(jiān)禁的相關(guān)法律規(guī)范較少,到目前為止,終身監(jiān)禁案例也只有三個。該部分主要介紹了終身監(jiān)禁第一人“白恩培”的貪污受賄案,簡略介紹了同被判處終身監(jiān)禁的魏鵬遠(yuǎn)、丁鐵義案件。終身監(jiān)禁制度的設(shè)立,在我國引起了不小的爭議,有人認(rèn)為該制度對貪污腐敗起到震懾作用,同時(shí)順應(yīng)了世界上死刑廢除的潮流。但也有人認(rèn)為該制度過于殘酷,剝奪犯罪分子的希望,侵犯人權(quán)。不同的觀點(diǎn)可以碰撞出更多火花,能夠更好的推動我國終身監(jiān)禁制度的發(fā)展。第四部分則是對終身監(jiān)禁制度的完善。這一部分是本文的重點(diǎn)所在,從立法、司法和制度保障三方面來進(jìn)行完善。在立法上,主要通過進(jìn)一步的立法進(jìn)行完善,同時(shí)明確與其他刑種的關(guān)系。在司法上,主要從司法解釋、適用程序、案例指導(dǎo)等方面入手;在保障機(jī)制上,建議完善復(fù)核、養(yǎng)老等制度,設(shè)立獎懲機(jī)制和監(jiān)督平臺等。
[Abstract]:The system of life imprisonment is translated by "life imprisonment" in the West. In 2015, Article 383 of the Criminal Law Amendment (9) of our country first included life imprisonment in the legal provisions of our country. There are two types of life imprisonment system in the world: one is life imprisonment on parole and the other is life imprisonment without parole. The rules vary from country to country. China's life imprisonment system is only applicable to corruption and bribery and can not be commuted, parole. This paper introduces the origin of the life imprisonment system, compares the foreign life imprisonment system with our country, analyzes the present situation and disputes of the system in our country, and puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the system. The main body of the thesis consists of four parts. The first part is an overview of life imprisonment system. This paper introduces the concept, characteristics and types of the system. Starting from the origin of the system, it goes back to the death penalty proposed by Beccaria for the first time, and points out that life imprisonment does not only mean that life imprisonment is not meant to be free for life. In different countries, there are also commutation and parole of life imprisonment system. In addition to introducing the origin of the system and the current situation of other countries, this paper mainly introduces the system of life imprisonment on parole and analyzes the relationship between the system and life imprisonment. At the end of this part, the author introduces the types of life imprisonment system, including life imprisonment with parole and life imprisonment without parole. The second part is a comparative study of life imprisonment system. The system of life imprisonment in China has just started, still in the embryonic state, there are still many deficiencies. However, the system of life imprisonment in western countries is more mature. This chapter makes a comparative study of the life imprisonment system between European countries and the United States, and uses their advantages for reference to further improve the life imprisonment system in our country. The third part is about the current situation and controversy of life imprisonment system in China. There are only three cases of life imprisonment in China. This part mainly introduces the case of embezzlement and bribery of "Bai Enpei", the first person in life imprisonment, and briefly introduces the case of Wei Pengyuan and Ding Tie-yi who were also sentenced to life imprisonment. The establishment of life imprisonment system has aroused considerable controversy in our country. Some people think that this system has a deterrent effect on corruption and conforms to the trend of abolition of death penalty in the world. But others say the system is too brutal, depriving criminals of hope and violating human rights. Different views can collide more sparks, can better promote the development of life imprisonment system in China. The fourth part is the perfection of life imprisonment system. This part is the focus of this paper, from the legislative, judicial and institutional protection to improve. In legislation, mainly through further legislation to improve, and at the same time to clarify the relationship with other types of punishment. In judicial, mainly from the judicial interpretation, applicable procedures, case guidance and so on; in the protection mechanism, it is suggested to improve the review, pension and other systems, set up a reward and punishment mechanism and supervision platform.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.1
，

本文編號：1979963