本文選題：國有企業(yè) + 競爭中立��； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：競爭是市場的核心,競爭機制的有效發(fā)揮是市場有效配置資源的基礎(chǔ),如何有效發(fā)揮市場競爭機制需要一個自由公平競爭的市場環(huán)境,市場經(jīng)濟本質(zhì)上是法治經(jīng)濟,一套完整的市場經(jīng)濟法律體系是市場經(jīng)濟健康有效運行的前提,在實現(xiàn)自由公平競爭的市場環(huán)境方面離不開以維護(hù)自由公平競爭的市場秩序為主要目標(biāo)的經(jīng)濟法中關(guān)于市場秩序規(guī)制法律制度也即競爭法律制度的保障。競爭中立制度作為國際競爭法與競爭政策在推動市場公平競爭方面的最新實踐成果,隨著我國國有企業(yè)改革的深入推進(jìn)和國際上如火如荼的國際經(jīng)貿(mào)治理規(guī)則的新一輪談判的展開,競爭中立制度越來越需要我們的重視。正文第一章介紹了國有企業(yè)競爭中立制度中國化的研究基礎(chǔ),特別是詳細(xì)梳理了國內(nèi)外有關(guān)研究現(xiàn)狀,并進(jìn)行了評析。對國有企業(yè)競爭中立制度中國化研究的主要背景進(jìn)行了介紹,即:國企改革之內(nèi)憂,國際經(jīng)貿(mào)治理規(guī)則之外患。由此引出研究主題:即國有企業(yè)競爭中立制度的中國化。第二章重點梳理和總結(jié)了國內(nèi)外有關(guān)競爭中立的基本理論,厘清復(fù)雜理論的邏輯脈絡(luò),挖掘競爭中立理念及其制度的基本內(nèi)涵。通過分析國際經(jīng)驗和國內(nèi)現(xiàn)實,明確競爭中立制度的含義,即競爭中立制度是政府為實現(xiàn)市場在資源配置中的決定性作用,更好地發(fā)揮政府作用,以社會整體效益最大化和建立公平競爭市場為目標(biāo),不為特定市場主體創(chuàng)設(shè)不當(dāng)競爭優(yōu)勢或劣勢條件而實施的一系列制度體系。緊接著分析論證了競爭中立制度的特征,一般適用范圍,基本構(gòu)成,非競爭中立的表現(xiàn)形式以及競爭中立制度的理論基礎(chǔ)。第三章考察了澳大利亞、OECD、TPP、歐盟以及發(fā)展中國家等不同版本的競爭中立在理念、制度和規(guī)則方面的差異及其背后隱含的邏輯理路,通過總結(jié)和分析不同版本之間的共性與個性,凸顯不同發(fā)展階段競爭中立理念及其制度選擇的差異性,繼而提出中國實施競爭中立制度的應(yīng)有方向。第四章分析論證了競爭中立制度在我國實施的必要性與可行性。為實施我國競爭中立制度的實施路徑提供理論支持。首先分析了我國競爭中立制度的現(xiàn)狀,包括法律實踐,政策實踐,具體實踐以及我國參與的自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定中的競爭中立制度,之后對競爭中立制度在我國現(xiàn)階段實施的必要性和可行性進(jìn)行分析論證,最后以上海為例分析探索競爭中立的必要性與可行性。第五章在前文論證的基礎(chǔ)上提出我國競爭中立制度的實施路徑。首先明確了我國在競爭中立問題上的基本立場,之后勾勒出我國競爭中立制度的基本構(gòu)成,包括基本概念、適用范圍、行為規(guī)則、實施機制、配套機制以及實施步驟。最后提出我國在國際經(jīng)貿(mào)治理規(guī)則制定中的應(yīng)對策略,即理性認(rèn)識競爭中立制度對我國在國際貿(mào)易中的不利影響,倡導(dǎo)回歸多邊合作體系以防止區(qū)域孤立主義的濫用以及以競爭中立制度在國際經(jīng)貿(mào)治理領(lǐng)域的興起為契機變壓力為動力推動國有企業(yè)深化改革的應(yīng)對策略。
[Abstract]:Competition is the core of the market. The effective play of the competition mechanism is the basis of the efficient allocation of resources in the market. How to effectively play the market competition mechanism requires a free and fair market environment. The market economy is essentially a rule of law economy. A complete set of market economic legal systems is the prerequisite for the healthy and effective operation of the market economy. The market environment of free and fair competition is inseparable from the protection of the legal system of market order regulation, that is, the legal system of competition law, which is the main objective of maintaining the market order of free and fair competition. The competitive neutrality system is the latest practical achievement in promoting fair competition in the market as the international competition law and the competition policy. With the deepening of the reform of China's state-owned enterprises and a new round of negotiations on international economic and trade governance rules, the system of competitive neutrality is becoming more and more important. Chapter 1 of the text introduces the research foundation of the Chinese national enterprise competition neutrality system, especially the relevant research at home and abroad. The main background of the research on the Chinese state-owned enterprise competition neutrality system is introduced, namely: the internal worry of the reform of state-owned enterprises and the foreign countries of the rules of international economic and trade governance. This leads to the research theme: the Chinese national enterprise competition neutrality system. The second chapter focuses on the competition neutrality at home and abroad. The basic theory, clarifies the logical vein of the complex theory and excavate the basic connotation of the concept of competitive neutrality and its system. Through the analysis of international experience and domestic reality, the meaning of the system of competition neutrality is clarified, that is, the system of competition neutrality is the decisive role of the government for the realization of the market in the allocation of resources, better play the role of the government, and take the whole society as a whole. The aim is to maximize the benefit and establish a fair competition market, not to create a series of institutional systems for the creation of unsuitable competitive advantage or inferior condition for a specific market subject. Then the characteristics of the system of competition neutrality, the general scope of application, the basic composition, the form of non competition and the theoretical basis of the system of competition neutrality are analyzed and demonstrated. The third chapter examines the differences between the different versions of competition neutrality in Australia, OECD, TPP, the European Union and the developing countries, and the logical logic behind the differences in ideas, systems and rules. By summarizing and analyzing the commonness and individuality between different versions, the difference between the concept of competitive neutrality and the difference in the choice of the system in the different stages of development is highlighted. The fourth chapter analyzes the necessity and feasibility of the implementation of the system of competitive neutrality in China. It provides theoretical support for implementing the implementation path of China's competition neutrality system. First, it analyzes the status of China's competition neutrality system, including legal practice, policy practice, and the implementation of the system of competition neutrality in China. The practice of body practice and the competitive neutrality system in the free trade agreements that our country participates in, then analyze the necessity and feasibility of the implementation of the competitive neutrality system at the present stage in our country. Finally, the necessity and feasibility of exploring the competition neutrality are analyzed with Shanghai as an example. The fifth chapter puts forward China's competitive neutrality on the basis of the previous argument. First, the basic position of China's competition neutrality is clarified, and then the basic composition of China's competition neutrality system is outlined, including basic concepts, scope of application, rules of conduct, implementation mechanism, supporting mechanism and implementation steps. Finally, the countermeasures are put forward in the formulation of international economic and Trade Governance rules in China, That is, a rational understanding of the adverse effects of the competitive neutrality system on China's international trade, advocating the return of the multilateral cooperation system to prevent the abuse of regional isolationism and the turning of the competitive neutrality system in the field of international economic and Trade Governance as a turning point to promote the deepening reform of the state-owned enterprises.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.291

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白金亞;施延亮;;消費者知情權(quán)在公益性服務(wù)合同中的保護(hù)[J];天津法學(xué);2016年04期

2 馬長山;;法治中國建設(shè)的“共建共享”路徑與策略[J];中國法學(xué);2016年06期

3 蔣大興;;廢除國資委?——一種理想主義者的“空想”[J];清華法學(xué);2016年06期

4 白金亞;;全面深化改革背景下國有公共企業(yè)法律規(guī)制研究[J];經(jīng)濟界;2016年06期

5 劉瑛;;《跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)定》國有企業(yè)章節(jié)的中國應(yīng)對[J];東方法學(xué);2016年05期

6 陳乃新;高強;陳陣香;;保障“市場決”的經(jīng)濟法新思維[J];經(jīng)濟法論叢;2015年01期

7 白金亞;;我國國有資產(chǎn)監(jiān)管體制的歷史演進(jìn)與發(fā)展研究[J];行政與法;2016年07期

8 公丕祥;;經(jīng)濟新常態(tài)下供給側(cè)改革的法治邏輯[J];法學(xué);2016年07期

9 楊紫p，

本文編號：1966329