本文選題：上訪 + 入罪可能性　； 參考：《煙臺大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：上訪是法律賦予公民的基本權利,但是隨著社會轉型的加快,滋生出要挾型上訪現(xiàn)象。要挾型上訪是指上訪者為了解決其本不合理的利益糾紛,利用上訪來要挾政府介入其糾紛,以便能夠實現(xiàn)其不合理的要求或者利益主張。根據(jù)行為人客觀上是否具有相應的權利基礎,可以將要挾型上訪分為具備權利基礎的要挾型上訪和不具備權利基礎的要挾型上訪。從要挾型上訪的社會危害性、刑事違法性、應受刑罰處罰性方面分析,有一部分要挾型上訪已經具備了入罪的可能性。對于具備權力基礎但是要求不合理的要挾型上訪而言,并不可以均認定為敲詐勒索罪,要具體問題具體分析,考慮多種因素,只有當其因具備權利基礎而有恃無恐,以非法占有為目的不斷上訪,要挾政府滿足其過分要求時,方可考慮適用敲詐勒索罪;對于行為人以非法占有為目的明知自己不具備權利基礎的要挾型上訪而言,其行為只要符合敲詐勒索罪的犯罪構成,一般是可以將其認定為敲詐勒索罪的。處理此類問題要考慮刑法的謙抑性原則和刑法的人權保障機能。在入罪方面,應統(tǒng)一并細化入罪的標準;在刑事立法方面,應完善敲詐勒索罪的規(guī)定、增設脅迫罪;在刑事量刑方面,要規(guī)范量刑程序。
[Abstract]:Petition is a basic right conferred by the law, but with the acceleration of social transformation, the phenomenon of threatening petition arises. In order to solve the unreasonable interest dispute, the petition means to use the petition to blackmail the government to intervene in the dispute so as to realize its unreasonable request or interest claim. According to whether the perpetrator objectively has the corresponding right basis, the blackmailing type of petition can be divided into two types: one with right basis and the other without right basis. From the aspects of social harmfulness, criminal illegality and punishment of threatening petition, some of them already have the possibility of incrimination. For a petition with a power base but unreasonable requirements, not all of them can be considered as the crime of extortion. It is necessary to analyze the specific problems and consider various factors, only if they have the right basis and have no fear. The crime of extortion may only be considered when the government is coerced into meeting its excessive requirements by constantly petitioning for the purpose of illegal possession; for a person who, for the purpose of illegal possession, knows that he or she does not have a right basis, As long as its behavior conforms to the crime of extortion, it can generally be regarded as the crime of extortion. To deal with this kind of problem, we should consider the principle of modesty of criminal law and the function of human rights protection of criminal law. In the aspect of incrimination, the standard of incrimination should be unified and refined; in the aspect of criminal legislation, the provisions of the crime of extortion should be perfected, and the crime of coercion should be added; in the aspect of criminal sentencing, the sentencing procedure should be standardized.
【學位授予單位】：煙臺大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 宋繼圣;;“事出有因”型敲詐勒索罪中的主觀占有目的[J];人民檢察;2014年09期

2 張明楷;;也談客觀歸責理論 兼與周光權、劉艷紅教授商榷[J];中外法學;2013年02期

3 宋曉;;判例生成與中國案例指導制度[J];法學研究;2011年04期

4 劉志堅;常治國;李紅洲;;敲詐勒索罪若干實務疑難問題研究[J];中國檢察官;2011年14期

5 周博文;;游離于敲詐勒索罪邊緣的過激上訪行為研究[J];公安研究;2011年06期

6 饒靜;葉敬忠;譚思;;“要挾型上訪”——底層政治邏輯下的農民上訪分析框架[J];中國農村觀察;2011年03期

7 柏浪濤;谷翔;;敲詐勒索與行使權利的界限[J];法律適用;2010年10期

8 孫萬懷;;敲詐勒索罪中目的與手段的組合性質[J];人民檢察;2009年05期

9 林維;劉飛;;從四個方面完善敲詐勒索罪立法[J];人民檢察;2008年16期

10 屠曉景;徐鳳;楊素琴;;如何認定權利行使過程中的敲詐勒索犯罪[J];中國檢察官;2008年04期

，

本文編號：1911049