本文選題：受虐婦女以暴制暴犯罪量刑 + 受虐婦女綜合征�。� 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：家庭暴力一直是一個(gè)世界性的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,其給受虐人(主要是婦女)帶來(lái)的身體傷害和精神傷害都是巨大的,甚至引發(fā)了受虐婦女從受害人到犯罪人的"惡逆變",這也是受虐婦女殺夫的案件近幾年頻繁出現(xiàn)在公眾視野中的原因。由于這類(lèi)案件的特殊性,我國(guó)對(duì)該問(wèn)題一直保持高度關(guān)注,致力于使犯罪的受虐婦女得到公正的處罰,并從根本上減少此類(lèi)犯罪的發(fā)生,《反家庭暴力法》的出臺(tái)便是該工作取得階段性成果的最好證明。但是還應(yīng)看到的是我國(guó)新出臺(tái)的《意見(jiàn)》中雖然肯定了防衛(wèi)因素和過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任,但是對(duì)于案件中成立正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的要求仍然較高,對(duì)于將受虐婦女綜合征作為放寬成立正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的要件仍未作出正面回應(yīng);我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)這類(lèi)案件量刑不一,甚至差異很大,大多數(shù)案件都量刑畸重,基本上適用的是故意殺人罪的第一法定刑幅度,不僅超出人們心里預(yù)期,也不利于受虐婦女積極進(jìn)行改造,重新回歸社會(huì)。受虐婦女以暴制暴犯罪的發(fā)生與社會(huì)救濟(jì)與保障制度薄弱、經(jīng)濟(jì)因素困擾,生活環(huán)境氛圍影響等多種因素相關(guān),綜合實(shí)踐中的大量案例來(lái)看,受虐婦女的人身危險(xiǎn)性和社會(huì)危害性都較小,她的暴力只針對(duì)于施暴人,這樣一類(lèi)人服刑期限過(guò)長(zhǎng),一方面造成了司法資源的浪費(fèi),一方面不利于她們完成贍養(yǎng)老人和撫養(yǎng)子女的責(zé)任。因此,本文在闡述受虐婦女以暴制暴犯罪的現(xiàn)狀、成因的基礎(chǔ)上,針對(duì)以暴制暴犯罪量刑現(xiàn)狀中所反映的問(wèn)題,結(jié)合當(dāng)前理論界對(duì)于減輕此類(lèi)犯罪量刑的幾種觀點(diǎn),分別是受虐婦女綜合征與防衛(wèi)過(guò)當(dāng)、期待可能性、酌定量刑情節(jié)等,從理論自身是否適用于受虐婦女以暴制暴案件以及如果適用該如何適用案件作了分析,以尋求受虐婦女以暴制暴犯罪能夠減輕量刑的最好出路。本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)在于對(duì)于受虐婦女以暴制暴犯罪的相關(guān)量刑因素作了比較全面的分析,對(duì)相關(guān)理論的應(yīng)用性作了探討,并且從刑事責(zé)任能力角度提出了減輕受虐婦女量刑的思路。
[Abstract]:Domestic violence has always been a worldwide hot issue, and the physical and mental harm it brings to the victims (mainly women) is enormous. It has even caused the malevolence of battered women from victim to criminal, which is the reason why the murder cases of battered women frequently appear in public view in recent years. Because of the special nature of such cases, our country has been paying high attention to the problem and is committed to fair punishment for battered women who commit crimes. And fundamentally reduce the occurrence of such crimes, the introduction of the Anti-domestic violence Law is the best proof of this work has achieved stage results. However, it should also be noted that although the defense factor and fault liability are affirmed in the newly issued "opinions" of our country, the requirements for establishing legitimate defense in the case are still relatively high. There is still no positive response to taking battered women's syndrome as an element of relaxing legitimate defense. In our judicial practice, the sentencing of this kind of cases is different, or even quite different. Most of these cases are extremely heavy. What basically applies is the first legal range of punishment for intentional homicide, which not only exceeds people's expectations, but also is not conducive to the active transformation of battered women and their return to society. The occurrence of violent crime against battered women is related to many factors, such as weak social relief and security system, perplexing economic factors, and the influence of living environment. The physical and social dangers of the abused woman are relatively small. Her violence is directed only at the perpetrators of violence. Such a group of women serve too long sentences, which on the one hand results in a waste of judicial resources. On the one hand, it is unfavorable for them to fulfill their responsibility of supporting the elderly and raising children. Therefore, on the basis of expounding the present situation and causes of violent crimes committed by abused women, this paper aims at the problems reflected in the present situation of sentencing for violent crimes, and combines with several viewpoints of current theoretical circles on reducing the sentencing of such crimes. They are masochistic women's syndrome and overdefense, expectation possibility, discretion of sentencing circumstances and so on. It analyzes whether the theory itself is applicable to cases of abused women using violence and, if so, how to apply the case. In order to seek the best way for battered women to punish violence by violence, the sentence can be mitigated. The innovation of this paper lies in the comprehensive analysis of the relevant sentencing factors of the violent crime committed by abused women, the discussion of the application of relevant theories, and the thought of reducing the punishment of abused women from the angle of criminal responsibility ability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹參;從以暴制暴到生命至上[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2004年18期

2 鄔鳳英;;打擊盜版豈能以暴制暴?[J];公民導(dǎo)刊;2009年03期

3 劉效仁;;法治社會(huì)拒絕以暴制暴的英雄觀[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)導(dǎo)刊;2007年03期

4 楊立波;;以暴制暴令人憂(yōu)[J];半月選讀;2007年10期

5 金陵俠;;名畫(huà)家與泄露裸照:以暴制暴人生蒙羞[J];戀愛(ài)婚姻家庭(紀(jì)實(shí));2012年06期

6 高鋒;;反劫持“以暴制暴”傳統(tǒng)處置模式否定論[J];湖南公安高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

7 徐慧;謝育敏;;婦女“以暴制暴”犯罪的成因及防控[J];贛南醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

8 李剛;;“以暴制暴”還是“預(yù)防性防御”[J];世界知識(shí);2001年19期

9 王雪萍;婦女“以暴制暴”犯罪問(wèn)題探究[J];求索;2004年12期

10 陳麗平;;女性以暴制暴犯罪源于立法缺位[J];政府法制;2010年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 郭文婧;“以暴制暴”與強(qiáng)化基層法治建設(shè)[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

2 解本友;“以暴制暴”是文明社會(huì)的悲哀[N];甘肅法制報(bào);2006年

3 朱績(jī)崧;以暴制暴與民不畏死[N];聯(lián)合時(shí)報(bào);2013年

4 江亞平;以暴制暴，，埃及只會(huì)越陷越深[N];新華每日電訊;2013年

5 本報(bào)記者 王小玲;多管齊下杜絕城管“以暴制暴”[N];四川日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

6 重慶市酉陽(yáng)土家族苗族自治縣人民法院 張銳;受虐婦女以暴制暴案量刑之權(quán)衡[N];人民法院報(bào);2010年

7 呂超;婦女“以暴制暴”犯罪探析[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2012年

8 記者 楊冰;受害者“以暴制暴”將酌情輕判[N];重慶日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

9 中華女子學(xué)院法學(xué)院講師 邢紅枚;對(duì)“以暴制暴”犯罪婦女應(yīng)寬緩刑罰[N];中國(guó)婦女報(bào);2013年

10 郭艾霞 本報(bào)記者　周麗婷 王永欽;應(yīng)對(duì)家暴：以暴制暴不可取[N];中國(guó)婦女報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 谷琛琛;受虐婦女以暴制暴犯罪的量刑問(wèn)題分析[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

本文編號(hào)：1835709