發(fā)布時間：2018-05-01 02:33

  本文選題：反壟斷損害賠償 + 訴權(quán)主體��； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟是反壟斷私人執(zhí)行的重要方式,不僅彌補了公共執(zhí)行的先天缺陷,而且極大地激發(fā)了私人提起反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟的熱情。目前,各國都在極力推進(jìn)反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟的制度構(gòu)建,其中,歐盟于2014年12月5日發(fā)布的《關(guān)于違反歐盟及其成員國競爭法的損害賠償訴訟若干規(guī)則的第2014/104號指令》(以下簡稱“第2014/104號指令”)是其中的典范。我國在該領(lǐng)域的最新立法是2012年6月1日起施行的《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理因壟斷行為引發(fā)的民事糾紛案件應(yīng)用法律若干問題的規(guī)定》(以下簡稱“若干問題的規(guī)定”),但其實施效果一直不太令人滿意。為此,我國越來越重視有關(guān)制度規(guī)則的學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒,歐盟反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟的發(fā)展與我國表現(xiàn)出相同的特征,非常值得我國學(xué)習(xí)。本文主要內(nèi)容如下:第一章是反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟一般理論。首先,指出本文所界定的反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟為狹義解釋,并與民法上的此制度進(jìn)行了比較。其次,通過壟斷的負(fù)外部性、反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟的公共物品性和公共實施的先天缺陷這三個角度論證了該制度構(gòu)建的必要性。最后,運用公共選擇理論、政府俘獲理論、理性選擇理論和信息不對稱理論闡述了該制度的理論基礎(chǔ)。第二章是歐盟反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟制度的歷史演進(jìn)。從立法和實踐兩個方面追溯了歐盟反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟的來源,之后經(jīng)過立法上的梳理,展示了歐盟一步步推進(jìn)反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟制度的決心。第三章是歐盟反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟制度的主要內(nèi)容。主要包括原則、主體制度、證據(jù)開示規(guī)則和其他配套制度四個方面,其中也涉及到成員國競爭主管機關(guān)的行政決定或者法院的裁決的認(rèn)定效力、訴訟時效等方面的規(guī)定。第四章是歐盟反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟制度對我國的啟示。通過立法和司法兩個方面對我國該制度的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了描述,并分析了其中所存在的問題:訴權(quán)主體范圍太過狹窄,間接購買者不能訴;證據(jù)制度加重了壟斷行為受害人的舉證責(zé)任;民事賠償范圍不能完全彌補壟斷行為受害人所受之損失;配套制度缺乏可操作性。鑒于此,本文為完善我國的反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟制度提出了幾點建議,即確立間接購買者的訴權(quán)主體資格、證據(jù)制度上對壟斷行為受害人適當(dāng)傾斜、確立完全賠償原則、建立有效的反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟配套制度�；谝陨纤悸�,本文通過一般理論、歷史演進(jìn)、主要內(nèi)容和對我國的啟示四個方面對反壟斷民事?lián)p害賠償訴訟進(jìn)行了制度層面的研究,以期對我國完善相關(guān)制度提供理論支撐。
[Abstract]:Anti-monopoly civil damages litigation is an important way of antimonopoly private execution, which not only makes up for the inherent defects of public enforcement, but also greatly stimulates the enthusiasm of private individuals to file antitrust civil damages litigation. At present, all countries are vigorously promoting the construction of the system of antimonopoly civil damages litigation, among which, The EU Directive No. 2014 / 104 (hereinafter referred to as "Directive No. 2014 / 104") issued on December 5, 2014, concerning the rules of damages litigation against the competition law of the EU and its member states, is an example. China's latest legislation in this field is the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of Law in handling Civil disputes caused by Monopoly, which came into effect on June 1, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as "some issues"). But the effect of its implementation has not been satisfactory. Therefore, our country pays more and more attention to the study and reference of the relevant system rules. The development of the European Union's antitrust civil damages litigation shows the same characteristics as our country, and it is very worthy of our country to learn. The main contents of this paper are as follows: the first chapter is the general theory of antitrust civil damages litigation. First of all, it points out that the antitrust civil damages litigation defined in this paper is narrowly interpreted and compared with this system in civil law. Secondly, through the negative externality of monopoly, the public goods of antimonopoly civil damage compensation litigation and the congenital defect of public implementation, the necessity of constructing the system is demonstrated. Finally, the theory of public choice, government capture, rational choice and information asymmetry are used to explain the theoretical basis of the system. The second chapter is the historical evolution of the anti-monopoly civil damages litigation system in the European Union. This paper traces the origin of EU antitrust civil damages litigation from the aspects of legislation and practice, and then, through legislative combing, shows the EU's determination to push forward the antimonopoly civil damages litigation system step by step. The third chapter is the main content of EU antitrust civil damages litigation system. It mainly includes four aspects: principle, subject system, rules of discovery of evidence and other supporting systems, which also involve the provisions of the administrative decisions of the competition authorities of member States or the determination effect of court decisions, the limitation of action and so on. The fourth chapter is the enlightenment to our country of EU anti-monopoly civil damages litigation system. This paper describes the current situation of this system in China through legislation and judicature, and analyzes the existing problems: the scope of the subject of the right of action is too narrow, the indirect purchaser can not sue; The evidence system has aggravated the burden of proof of the victim of monopoly behavior; the scope of civil compensation cannot completely compensate for the loss suffered by the victim of monopoly act; and the supporting system lacks maneuverability. In view of this, this paper puts forward several suggestions for perfecting our country's antitrust civil damage compensation litigation system, that is, to establish the subject qualification of the indirect purchaser's right of action, to establish the principle of complete compensation in the system of evidence in favor of the victim of monopoly behavior. Establish an effective antitrust civil damages suit supporting system. Based on the above ideas, this paper, through the general theory, the historical evolution, the main content and the enlightenment to our country, has carried on the system research to the antitrust civil damage compensation lawsuit, in order to provide the theory support to our country consummate the related system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D95;DD912.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳兆豐;;歐盟競爭法私人執(zhí)行制度的新發(fā)展——基于歐盟競爭違法損害賠償新指令[J];廣西社會科學(xué);2016年11期

2 葉衛(wèi)平;;反壟斷法的舉證責(zé)任分配[J];法學(xué);2016年11期

3 林燕萍;俞勝杰;;《關(guān)于違反歐盟及其成員國競爭法的損害賠償訴訟若干規(guī)則的指令》之評析與借鑒[J];政治與法律;2016年11期

4 剌森;;歐盟競爭法公共執(zhí)行最終意見在私人訴訟中的證明效力研究[J];法學(xué)論壇;2016年03期

5 王闖;;中國反壟斷民事訴訟概況及展望[J];競爭政策研究;2016年02期

6 陳燦祁;;歐盟反壟斷民事訴訟中的證據(jù)開示研究[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2016年02期

7 沙穎潔;;政府俘獲行為過程分析及對抗策略[J];商;2016年06期

8 王健;;關(guān)于推進(jìn)我國反壟斷私人訴訟的思考[J];法商研究;2010年03期

9 李海曼;;論我國反壟斷法損害賠償訴訟的適格原告[J];廣西大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年S1期

10 陳承堂;;反壟斷法中的間接購買者規(guī)則研究[J];政治與法律;2008年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王海力;反壟斷民事訴訟制度研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2016年

2 陳燦祁;歐盟反壟斷法私人實施研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2014年

3 萬宗瓚;反壟斷私人訴訟制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李利敏;反壟斷民事訴訟證據(jù)制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2013年

2 袁有華;反壟斷法國家民事訴訟制度研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2010年

3 鄭紅玲;反壟斷法損害賠償制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1827365