本文選題：社會(huì)協(xié)商 + 協(xié)商民主�。� 參考：《中共江蘇省委黨�！�2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著中共十八大以來,黨和政府提出要完善中國協(xié)商民主體系的建設(shè),社會(huì)協(xié)商發(fā)展將成為完善協(xié)商民主體系的重要方面。社會(huì)協(xié)商的發(fā)展不僅能緩和社會(huì)矛盾,改善政府與人民之間的關(guān)系,加強(qiáng)社會(huì)協(xié)作,更有利于決策科學(xué)化,提升決策的合法性和有效性。理清社會(huì)協(xié)商發(fā)展存在的問題,是破解社會(huì)協(xié)商制度化發(fā)展路徑的必然選擇,是推進(jìn)協(xié)商民主體系完善的必然選擇。中國社會(huì)協(xié)商發(fā)展中曲折發(fā)展,獲得了很多寶貴經(jīng)驗(yàn),也沉淀了社會(huì)協(xié)商發(fā)展理論。中國社會(huì)協(xié)商在不斷發(fā)展中取得了一定的效果,但是在發(fā)展過程中也暴露出一些問題,包括實(shí)踐中存在的問題和理論發(fā)展中的問題。首先,社會(huì)協(xié)商發(fā)展中遇到的實(shí)踐問題有三個(gè):參與雙方如何平等、協(xié)商程序如何制定、協(xié)商成本如何控制等。進(jìn)而分析實(shí)踐問題所產(chǎn)生的原因:第一是政府的主導(dǎo)定位與制度缺乏導(dǎo)致協(xié)商體制缺乏張力,第二是階層分化與經(jīng)濟(jì)壓力帶來的經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)實(shí),第三是人民團(tuán)體力量不夠缺乏社會(huì)基礎(chǔ)。其次,社會(huì)協(xié)商發(fā)展至今已經(jīng)積淀很多理論,然而目前仍然存在一些理論研究方面的不足,主要有三個(gè)方面:傳統(tǒng)協(xié)商文化沒有被吸收進(jìn)來、中國社會(huì)協(xié)商的發(fā)展不能照搬西方協(xié)商民主理論,馬克思主義民主理論亟待完善發(fā)展。分析社會(huì)協(xié)商理論問題可以發(fā)現(xiàn)造成的原因主要是傳統(tǒng)協(xié)商文化未受重視、理論與實(shí)踐發(fā)展不相適應(yīng)、尚未構(gòu)建出中國社會(huì)協(xié)商話語體系。在分析了社會(huì)協(xié)商發(fā)展中存在問題和原因的基礎(chǔ)上,為了促進(jìn)中國社會(huì)協(xié)商進(jìn)一步發(fā)展,讓社會(huì)協(xié)商發(fā)揮其協(xié)商討論的價(jià)值和意義,探討促進(jìn)中國社會(huì)協(xié)商發(fā)展的對(duì)策:第一,構(gòu)建中國特色社會(huì)協(xié)商理論,把傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)協(xié)商文化、群眾路線等思想基礎(chǔ)納入進(jìn)來;第二,健全社會(huì)協(xié)商的制度體系,規(guī)范社會(huì)協(xié)商參與主體的法律地位和作用,規(guī)范社會(huì)協(xié)商的程序,避免社會(huì)協(xié)商在實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的問題;第三,完善社會(huì)協(xié)商的監(jiān)督機(jī)制,設(shè)立專門監(jiān)督小組,完善問責(zé)機(jī)制、信息公示機(jī)制;第四,發(fā)展人民團(tuán)體的作用,培育人民團(tuán)體的協(xié)商能力,發(fā)揮人民團(tuán)體的功能。社會(huì)協(xié)商是能夠幫助政府了解群眾利益訴求的一種溝通渠道,如何在社會(huì)實(shí)踐中運(yùn)用好社會(huì)協(xié)商制度、機(jī)制,幫助政府科學(xué)決策和民主決策,是社會(huì)協(xié)商發(fā)展的一個(gè)重要任務(wù)。
[Abstract]:Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the Party and the government have proposed to perfect the construction of China's consultative democracy system, and the development of social consultation will become an important aspect of perfecting the consultative democracy system. The development of social consultation can not only ease the social contradictions, improve the relationship between the government and the people, strengthen social cooperation, but also help to make decisions more scientific and enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of decision-making. To clear up the problems existing in the development of social consultation is the inevitable choice to solve the development path of the institutionalization of social consultation and the inevitable choice to promote the perfection of the democratic system of consultation. The development of social consultation in China has gained a lot of valuable experience and precipitated the development theory of social consultation. Social consultation in China has achieved certain results in the continuous development, but in the process of development, some problems have been exposed, including the problems in practice and the problems in the development of theory. First of all, there are three practical problems in the development of social negotiation: how to equalize the two sides, how to formulate the negotiation procedure, how to control the negotiation cost, and so on. Then it analyzes the causes of the practical problems: first, the lack of tension in the consultation system caused by the leading position of the government and the lack of the system; secondly, the economic reality brought by the stratification and economic pressure. Third, people's organizations are not strong enough to lack the social foundation. Secondly, the development of social consultation has accumulated a lot of theories up to now. However, there are still some deficiencies in theoretical research at present. There are mainly three aspects: the traditional negotiation culture has not been absorbed. The development of social consultation in China cannot copy the western theory of consultative democracy, and the Marxist theory of democracy needs to be improved. By analyzing the problems of social negotiation theory, we can find that the traditional negotiation culture has not been attached importance to, the theory and practice have not adapted to the development, and the discourse system of social negotiation in China has not been constructed. On the basis of analyzing the existing problems and reasons in the development of social consultation, in order to promote the further development of social consultation in China, let social consultation give play to the value and significance of its consultation and discuss the countermeasures to promote the development of social consultation in China: first, Construct the theory of social consultation with Chinese characteristics, bring into account the traditional social consultation culture, mass line, etc. Second, perfect the system of social consultation, standardize the legal status and role of the participants in social consultation. To standardize the procedures of social consultation and to avoid the problems arising from social consultation in practice; third, to improve the supervision mechanism of social consultation, to set up special supervision groups, to improve accountability mechanisms, and to publicize information; fourth, to develop the role of people's organizations. Cultivate the consultative ability of the people's organizations and give play to the functions of the people's organizations. Social consultation is a communication channel that can help the government to understand the interests of the masses. How to make good use of the social consultation system and mechanism in social practice and help the government to make scientific and democratic decisions is an important task for the development of social consultation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中共江蘇省委黨校
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D621

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程?hào)|平;程軍師;;“社會(huì)協(xié)商知識(shí)觀”的困境與出路——對(duì)強(qiáng)綱領(lǐng)的一個(gè)批判[J];學(xué)理論;2009年16期

2 鄭文睿;;政策性文件中“社會(huì)協(xié)商”概念的探討——以不同語境下的用法為核心的考察[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年02期

3 馬奔;李珍珍;;社會(huì)協(xié)商中的共同愿景建構(gòu)——愿景工作坊的內(nèi)涵、制度及其評(píng)價(jià)[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實(shí);2014年01期

4 楊守濤;;政府與社會(huì)協(xié)商的主體實(shí)質(zhì)性不平等初探——關(guān)于固有性及負(fù)面影響的規(guī)范性分析[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2011年12期

5 劉新祿;曹彩霞;;社會(huì)協(xié)商機(jī)制構(gòu)建與國家治理現(xiàn)代化[J];人民論壇;2014年20期

6 吳碧君;;社會(huì)協(xié)商是實(shí)現(xiàn)基層社會(huì)良性運(yùn)行的有效途徑——以成都市縣、鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)、村(社區(qū))三級(jí)社會(huì)協(xié)商機(jī)制為例[J];四川省社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

7 林尚立;;社會(huì)協(xié)商與社會(huì)建設(shè):以區(qū)分社會(huì)管理與社會(huì)治理為分析視角[J];中國高校社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年07期

8 楊興平;;發(fā)揮社會(huì)組織作用 積極發(fā)展社會(huì)協(xié)商——學(xué)習(xí)中共十八屆三中全會(huì)精神[J];四川統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線;2014年01期

9 祝麗生;;制度化視角下基層社會(huì)協(xié)商治理實(shí)證研究——基于夏履程序的分析[J];行政與法;2014年06期

10 傅俊榮;;波蘭的社會(huì)協(xié)商、對(duì)話與公決[J];今日蘇聯(lián)東歐;1988年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 本報(bào)記者 張瑩瑩;社會(huì)協(xié)商：凝聚共識(shí)成合力[N];云南政協(xié)報(bào);2014年

2 謝立中;完善社會(huì)協(xié)商制度迫在眉捷[N];中國社會(huì)報(bào);2004年

3 鄧偉志;運(yùn)用社會(huì)協(xié)商為和諧社會(huì)服務(wù)[N];人民政協(xié)報(bào);2005年

4 本報(bào)記者 潘革平;比利時(shí)：社會(huì)協(xié)商保障員工權(quán)益[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2007年

5 潘革平;比利時(shí)通過社會(huì)協(xié)商機(jī)制保障勞動(dòng)者權(quán)益[N];中國社會(huì)報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王聰穎;中國社會(huì)協(xié)商發(fā)展的問題及對(duì)策研究[D];中共江蘇省委黨校;2017年

2 陳怡;當(dāng)代中國社會(huì)協(xié)商問題研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2015年

3 劉亞寧;社會(huì)組織參與社會(huì)協(xié)商的實(shí)踐路徑研究[D];南京信息工程大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號(hào)：1820205