本文選題：毒品再犯 + 累犯��； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前,我國(guó)毒品犯罪形勢(shì)依舊嚴(yán)峻,特別是毒品再犯問(wèn)題尤為突出,需要?jiǎng)?chuàng)設(shè)一套新的專(zhuān)門(mén)針對(duì)毒品再犯的刑罰體系來(lái)減少和預(yù)防毒品犯罪�，F(xiàn)行刑法的毒品再犯制度的特征有三,一是評(píng)價(jià)內(nèi)容的特定性,這也是由當(dāng)前嚴(yán)峻形勢(shì)下毒品犯罪的特殊性所決定的;二是量刑情節(jié)的偏重性,與毒品犯罪人的人身危險(xiǎn)性和主觀惡性息息相關(guān);三是與累犯制度的異種性,正是因?yàn)槎酒吩俜钢贫扰c累犯制度的異種性區(qū)別,與累犯制度較為完備的法律規(guī)定相比,毒品再犯在法條設(shè)置上確有諸多不當(dāng)之處,必須加以完善。以往學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)于毒品再犯制度的定性總是圍繞在“特別累犯說(shuō)”與“特別再犯說(shuō)”之間,但兩種學(xué)說(shuō)自身都存在著一些缺陷,因而始終沒(méi)有形成一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的定論�？梢园讯酒吩俜钢贫榷ㄐ詾閺浹a(bǔ)累犯制度不能對(duì)再犯嚴(yán)重毒品犯罪情形時(shí)從重處罰的特殊條款。這既厘清了毒品再犯制度與累犯制度之間關(guān)系,也為正確解讀該條規(guī)定之內(nèi)容并進(jìn)行司法適用提供了合理的邏輯起點(diǎn)。要以特殊預(yù)防功能之體現(xiàn)與刑罰個(gè)別化價(jià)值之要求為完善依據(jù),對(duì)毒品再犯制度的成立條件進(jìn)行了合理限定調(diào)整,將毒品再犯的前罪范圍擴(kuò)大至刑法分則第六章第七節(jié)規(guī)定的全部毒品犯罪,并且加入散見(jiàn)于刑法其他章節(jié)中的涉毒犯罪。把前后罪的時(shí)間限定在前罪刑罰執(zhí)行完畢或者赦免后的二十年之內(nèi),只將那些因販賣(mài)毒品罪被判處五年以上有期徒刑被赦免或者刑罰執(zhí)行完畢以后,十年以內(nèi)再犯應(yīng)當(dāng)被判處五年以上有期徒刑的販賣(mài)毒品罪的未成年人犯罪人納入毒品再犯制度的打擊范圍。并且前后罪的刑種條件應(yīng)當(dāng)設(shè)立為被判處拘役以上刑罰的,排除緩刑與假釋的適用。最后,在刑法總則第四章第二節(jié)中設(shè)立新的毒品再犯制度的具體立法規(guī)定,形成統(tǒng)一的再犯制度體系。
[Abstract]:At present, the situation of drug crime in our country is still severe, especially the problem of drug recidivism. It is necessary to create a new penalty system for drug recidivism to reduce and prevent drug crimes. There are three characteristics of the drug recidivism system in the current criminal law, one is the specificity of the evaluation content, which is also determined by the particularity of the drug crime under the current severe situation, the other is the emphasis on the circumstances of sentencing. It is closely related to the personal danger and subjective malignancy of drug offenders. The third is the heterogeneity of recidivism system, which is precisely because of the heterogeneity difference between drug recidivism system and recidivism system, and compared with the more complete legal provisions of recidivism system. Drug recidivism in the provisions of the law is indeed a lot of improper, must be improved. In the past, the nature of drug recidivism in academic circles was always centered between "special recidivism" and "special recidivism", but there were some defects in the two theories themselves, so they never formed a unified conclusion. The drug recidivism system can be characterized as a special clause which makes up for the recidivism system which can not be severely punished when the serious drug crime is committed again. This not only clarifies the relationship between drug recidivism system and recidivism system, but also provides a reasonable logical starting point for the correct interpretation of the content of the article and judicial application. On the basis of the embodiment of special preventive function and the demand of individualized penalty, the establishment conditions of drug recidivism system should be rationally limited and adjusted. The scope of the former crime of drug recidivism is extended to all the drug-related crimes stipulated in Chapter VI, Section VII of the Criminal Law, and the drug-related crimes which are scattered in other sections of the Criminal Law are added. Limit the time of the former crime to 20 years after the execution of the former crime's punishment or pardon, and only those who have been sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years for the crime of drug trafficking or after the execution of the sentence has been completed, Minor offenders who should be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of more than five years for drug trafficking within 10 years shall be included in the scope of the drug recidivism system. And if the conditions of punishment before and after the crime should be established as criminal detention or above, the application of probation and parole shall be excluded. Finally, in chapter four, section two of the general principles of criminal law, the author sets up the specific legislative provisions of the new drug recidivism system and forms a unified recidivism system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡東飛;;毒品累犯與毒品再犯競(jìng)合之處理[J];法商研究;2017年01期

2 黃明儒;項(xiàng)婷婷;;論《刑法修正案(九)》“終身監(jiān)禁”的性質(zhì)[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年05期

3 王文州;;未成年人不應(yīng)構(gòu)成毒品再犯——基于對(duì)刑法356條規(guī)定的反思[J];法制博覽;2016年04期

4 袁登明;;毒品再犯制度適用問(wèn)題研究[J];法律適用;2014年09期

5 劉憲權(quán);李振林;;論刑法中法律擬制的法理基礎(chǔ)[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年04期

6 郭華;李豪;趙靖;;論毒品再犯與一般累犯競(jìng)合的法律適用[J];西南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年08期

7 陳偉;;1997年《刑法》第356條定性之研究[J];法商研究;2013年03期

8 吳江;;刑法分則中注意規(guī)定與法律擬制的區(qū)分[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2012年11期

9 張明楷;;刑法學(xué)中的當(dāng)然解釋[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2012年04期

10 常秀嬌;吳e，

本文編號(hào)：1811528