本文選題：電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù) + 效力　； 參考：《煙臺(tái)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：《最高人民法院關(guān)于適用〈中華人民共和國(guó)民事訴訟法〉的解釋》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)《民訴法解釋》)于2015年2月4日起正式公布實(shí)施,其對(duì)作為民事證據(jù)類(lèi)型的電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)進(jìn)行了法律上明確的定位和規(guī)范。但在立法層面與司法實(shí)務(wù)過(guò)程中,電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)的理論與操作方面仍有亟待解決的問(wèn)題,筆者結(jié)合工作經(jīng)驗(yàn),在一個(gè)新的框架下進(jìn)行電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)的效力論證。受電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)與時(shí)俱進(jìn)的時(shí)代特性影響,目前我國(guó)電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)立法存在漏洞,審判實(shí)踐中存在癥結(jié)。筆者通過(guò)分析工作實(shí)務(wù)案例,從證據(jù)資格與證明力方面入手,進(jìn)一步找出認(rèn)定電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)效力過(guò)程中存在的障礙�？v觀全文來(lái)看,結(jié)合論證,筆者對(duì)于立法及司法領(lǐng)域有針對(duì)性的提出完善意見(jiàn)。立法論層面,宏觀上樹(shù)立立法模式理念,微觀上搭建具體制度細(xì)化電子數(shù)據(jù)的認(rèn)定程序;司法論層面上,注重程序集群建構(gòu),按訴訟進(jìn)程脈絡(luò),在庭審開(kāi)始前,規(guī)范電子數(shù)據(jù)的采集、保全等集群。另一方面,在庭審過(guò)程中,提出專(zhuān)家人相關(guān)制度、瑕疵證據(jù)排除制度、舉證質(zhì)證制度等制度集群。
[Abstract]:The interpretation of the application of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China by the Supreme people's Court (hereinafter referred to as the interpretation of the Civil procedure Law) was officially promulgated and implemented on February 4, 2015.The electronic data evidence, which is the type of civil evidence, is clearly positioned and regulated in law.However, in the process of legislation and judicial practice, there are still some urgent problems in the theory and operation of electronic data evidence.Under the influence of electronic data evidence advancing with the times, there are loopholes in the legislation of electronic data evidence in our country at present, and there are sticking points in the trial practice.Based on the analysis of practical cases, the author tries to find out the obstacles in the process of determining the validity of electronic data evidence from the aspects of evidence qualification and proof power.Throughout the full text, combined with argumentation, the author of the legislative and judicial areas to put forward targeted suggestions.At the level of legislation theory, we should set up the idea of legislation mode on the macro level, set up the concrete system to refine the identification procedure of electronic data on the micro level; on the level of judicial theory, we should pay attention to the construction of procedure cluster, according to the process of litigation, before the beginning of the trial,Standardize electronic data collection, security and other clusters.On the other hand, in the trial process, put forward the expert related system, defect evidence exclusion system, evidence cross-examination system and other institutional clusters.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 倪晶;;民事訴訟中電子證據(jù)的真實(shí)性認(rèn)定[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年02期

2 龍衛(wèi)球;裴煒;;電子證據(jù)概念與審查認(rèn)定規(guī)則的構(gòu)建研究[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年02期

3 張文慧;;淺析民事訴訟中的電子證據(jù)制度的缺陷[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年20期

4 胡瑞;;電子證據(jù)在民事訴訟中的應(yīng)用[J];品牌;2015年01期

5 李學(xué)軍;朱夢(mèng)妮;;專(zhuān)家輔助人制度研析[J];法學(xué)家;2015年01期

6 孔陸;;關(guān)于基層檢察機(jī)關(guān)電子證據(jù)運(yùn)用情況的調(diào)研報(bào)告[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年16期

7 劉顯鵬;;微博的證據(jù)屬性及其收集程序探析[J];學(xué)習(xí)與實(shí)踐;2014年05期

8 王敏遠(yuǎn);祁建建;;電子數(shù)據(jù)的收集、固定和運(yùn)用的程序規(guī)范問(wèn)題研究[J];法律適用;2014年03期

9 楊瑜嫻;劉顯鵬;;常見(jiàn)電子證據(jù)收集程序探析[J];西南交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年01期

10 趙杰;;論民事訴訟中專(zhuān)家輔助人的法律定位[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2011年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1744650