本文選題：庭前會議　切入點：效能　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：庭前會議制度是2013年修訂的《中華人民共和國刑事訴訟法》第一百八十二條新增加的一項制度。在法庭審判前對可能影響公正審判的問題聽取意見,了解情況,有助于法官確定庭審重點,提高庭審效率,保障庭審質(zhì)量。(1)隨著刑事訴訟程序的不斷改革與完善,審判程序的地位日益上升,以庭審為中心的刑事審判程序成為當(dāng)前刑事訴訟程序改革的重中之重,也成為評價刑事訴訟工作的關(guān)鍵要素。在實務(wù)界,為了增強(qiáng)刑事庭前會議的可行性,部分地方司法機(jī)關(guān)也做出了相應(yīng)舉動,制定刑事庭前會議試行規(guī)則等相關(guān)文件。在理論界,該制度成為了研究熱點,學(xué)者在各方面提出問題并形成獨(dú)到見解,成果頗豐。庭前會議之所以一出現(xiàn)就備受關(guān)注并且引起廣泛討論,是因為它出現(xiàn)的必要性和現(xiàn)實性,刑事庭前會議對提高庭審效率、發(fā)揮庭審作用的重要性不言而喻。如何更好的保障庭審并發(fā)揮其決定性作用、如何實現(xiàn)以審判為中心,成為了法律界共同的課題,刑事庭前會議制度無疑將在其中發(fā)揮重大作用。筆者跟隨中國政法大學(xué)訴訟法學(xué)研究院“刑事訴訟庭前會議制度研究”項目組對北京市、江蘇省鹽城市和無錫市的12個相關(guān)司法機(jī)關(guān)展開了實地調(diào)研和實證考察。本文將從法院的視角出發(fā),選取其中5個地區(qū)相關(guān)法院召開庭前會議的數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析和比較,以此為基礎(chǔ)對該制度展開一系列的觀察和討論。力求在實踐數(shù)據(jù)的基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合文獻(xiàn)分析,設(shè)計和驗證該制度的效能作用,為推進(jìn)以審判為中心的訴訟制度改革提出有益建議。本文共分為四個部分,在第一章我國刑事庭前會議制度概述中,闡述該制度出臺的理論背景與現(xiàn)實意義,并結(jié)合當(dāng)下立法規(guī)定來探討刑事庭前會議制度的效能作用,分析認(rèn)為該制度的主要效能是保障庭審的集中進(jìn)行、提高訴訟效率、加強(qiáng)程序正義;第二章從實證考察的角度對刑事庭前會議的實施情況進(jìn)行分析,結(jié)合A、B、C、D、E五地兩級調(diào)研法院自刑事訴訟法修改以來召開刑事庭前會議的相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù),從庭前會議制度總體適用情況和庭前會議具體適用程序兩個大方面展開分析;第三章在經(jīng)過一系列對庭前會議制度司法實踐現(xiàn)狀分析后,進(jìn)而探討目前司法實踐中存在的難點及制度運(yùn)行之障礙,主要集中于制度適用率低、制度實施的具體程序不規(guī)范和庭前會議效力不明確這三大方面;最后,通過對現(xiàn)存問題的深度剖析和思考,探尋我國刑事庭前會議制度的發(fā)展方向與問題解決之路徑:首先應(yīng)就庭前會議制度本身進(jìn)行完善,其次應(yīng)當(dāng)建立健全相關(guān)的配套制度,通過建立健全完善被告人訴訟權(quán)益保障制度、完善證據(jù)開示制度、提升司法信息化水平等一系列配套制度來為庭前會議制度的有序發(fā)展保駕護(hù)航。
[Abstract]:Pre-court meeting system is a new system of Article 182 of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China, which was revised in 2013.Hearing opinions and learning about issues that may affect a fair trial before the trial of the court will help the judge to determine the priorities of the trial, improve the efficiency of the trial, and guarantee the quality of the trial.) with the continuous reform and improvement of the criminal procedure,The status of the trial procedure is rising day by day. The criminal trial procedure centered on the trial becomes the most important part of the reform of the current criminal procedure and the key element of the evaluation of the criminal procedure.In practice, in order to enhance the feasibility of the pre-court meeting, some local judicial organs have also made corresponding actions to formulate the trial rules of the pre-court meeting and other relevant documents.In the theoretical circle, the system has become a research hotspot.The reason why the pre-court meeting has attracted much attention and caused extensive discussion is because of its necessity and reality. The importance of the pre-court meeting in improving the efficiency of the trial and playing the role of the trial is self-evident.How to better protect the trial and play its decisive role, how to realize the trial as the center, has become a common topic in the legal profession, the criminal court conference system will undoubtedly play a major role in it.Following the project of "study on the system of Pre-court meeting in Criminal procedure" of the Institute of procedural Law of China University of political Science and Law, the author has carried out field investigation and empirical investigation on 12 relevant judicial organs in Beijing, Yancheng and Wuxi of Jiangsu Province.In this paper, from the perspective of the court, we choose the data of the pre-court meeting held by the relevant courts in five regions for analysis and comparison, and then make a series of observations and discussions on the system.Based on the practical data, this paper tries to design and verify the effectiveness of the system based on the literature analysis, and puts forward some useful suggestions for the reform of the trial centered litigation system.This paper is divided into four parts. In the first chapter, the author expounds the theoretical background and practical significance of the system, and discusses the effectiveness of the system in the light of the current legislation.The main effectiveness of the system is to ensure the centralized conduct of the trial, improve the efficiency of the proceedings, strengthen procedural justice. Chapter II from the perspective of empirical investigation of the implementation of the pre-court meeting of the criminal analysis,Based on the relevant data of the criminal court meeting held since the revision of the Criminal procedure Law, this paper analyzes the general application of the pre-court meeting system and the concrete application procedure of the pre-court meeting.After a series of analysis on the present situation of the judicial practice of the pretrial conference system, the third chapter probes into the difficulties in the present judicial practice and the obstacles to the operation of the system, mainly focusing on the low application rate of the system.The specific procedures of system implementation are not standardized and the effectiveness of the pre-trial meeting is not clear. Finally, through the in-depth analysis and reflection on the existing problems,First of all, we should perfect the pre-court conference system itself, and secondly, we should establish and perfect the relevant supporting system.A series of supporting systems, such as establishing and perfecting the protection system of defendant's litigation rights and interests, perfecting the system of discovery of evidence and improving the level of judicial information, are used to escort the orderly development of the system of pre-trial conference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 蔣宏敏;田娜西;劉瑤;王達(dá);;刑事案件律師辯護(hù)率及辯護(hù)意見采納情況實證研究(下)——以四省(區(qū)、市)1203份判決書為研究對象[J];中國律師;2016年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊忠明;經(jīng)濟(jì)憲政正義原則研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 張承兵;中國特色的刑事審判庭前會議制度研究[D];貴州民族大學(xué);2014年

2 張亞東;刑事庭前會議制度研究[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2014年

3 厲曉燕;刑事庭前會議制度實施問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2014年

4 張杰;刑事庭前會議制度研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2013年

5 朱t，

本文編號：1728973