本文選題：終身監(jiān)禁　切入點：刑罰措施　出處：《河南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：終身監(jiān)禁作為一種自由刑,主要存在于英美法系國家,無論是從其理論淵源,還是從國外立法的初衷來看,終身監(jiān)禁均是以死刑替代刑抑或替代措施的姿態(tài)出現(xiàn)的。然而,我國《刑法修正案(九)》在貪污受賄犯罪中規(guī)定的終身監(jiān)禁,并沒有照搬照抄國外的經(jīng)驗,新增的終身監(jiān)禁并非是一種獨立的刑罰種類,也非死刑的替代措施。正是這一特殊的立法定位,引起了學(xué)術(shù)界的大討論,對貪污受賄犯罪中的終身監(jiān)禁予以這種特殊的界定,有無妥當(dāng)性;其應(yīng)怎樣協(xié)調(diào)《刑法》總則和分則之間的關(guān)系;其與其他刑罰,如死刑緩期執(zhí)行制度、無期徒刑和限制減刑制度間的關(guān)系該如何處理等一系列問題,這些爭議的問題需要刑法學(xué)界深入研究。本文將先從一般意義上的終身監(jiān)禁之理論起源、內(nèi)涵、國外法律規(guī)定情況,宏觀上把握終身監(jiān)禁。終身監(jiān)禁源于貝卡利亞的死刑廢止觀點,他主張廢除死刑可以用終身監(jiān)禁取而代之。此后,這種死刑替代刑的觀點在一些國刑法中也得以貫徹,終身監(jiān)禁在各國的立法表現(xiàn)形式多種多樣,但有其共同之處,如其適用對象往往是人身危險性大、罪行嚴(yán)重但是不是必須被判處死刑,而又需要永久隔絕社會的罪犯;其是最嚴(yán)厲的自由刑,對自由的剝奪往往是終身的,但終身監(jiān)禁的狀態(tài)可以通過減刑、假釋或者赦免改變。反觀我國,我國的終身監(jiān)禁是不得減刑、假釋的,由于終身監(jiān)禁是以增加自由刑的方式壓縮死刑的適用,符合刑罰的發(fā)展的輕緩化趨勢,再加之我國刑事政策要求“嚴(yán)懲貪腐,少用、慎用死刑”,所以,在修法過程中引入終身監(jiān)禁具有法理、政策和實踐價值。要想更好地實現(xiàn)上述價值,就必須對我國《刑法》中新增的終身監(jiān)禁的法律屬性有進一步清晰的認(rèn)定,從法律規(guī)定本身來看,我國的終身監(jiān)禁應(yīng)界定為一種依附于死刑緩期執(zhí)行和無期徒刑的一種兼具行刑與量刑性質(zhì)的特殊刑罰措施。明確了其法律屬性,接著探討我國終身監(jiān)禁的適用情況,以及其和《刑法》總則、分則之間的關(guān)系,得出終身監(jiān)禁并沒有突破刑罰體系安排,其是對《刑法》總則的變通,是《刑法》分則彌補總則的僵硬性的體現(xiàn),通過這種例外之規(guī)定,使《刑法》更能與時俱進,充分發(fā)揮其保障法的作用。同時,規(guī)定在分則中的終身監(jiān)禁不同于總則中的死刑緩期執(zhí)行制度、無期徒刑和限制減刑制度,其進一步完善了我國的刑罰體系,所以設(shè)想將終身監(jiān)禁獨立為一個刑罰種類。
[Abstract]:Life imprisonment, as a kind of free punishment, mainly exists in Anglo-American legal system countries. Whether from its theoretical origin or from the original intention of foreign legislation, life imprisonment appears as a substitute for death penalty or an alternative measure.However, the life imprisonment stipulated in the Criminal Law Amendment (9) does not copy the experience of foreign countries. The new life imprisonment is not a kind of independent punishment, nor is it an alternative to the death penalty.It is this special legislative orientation that has aroused a great discussion in academic circles, whether it is appropriate to give this special definition of life imprisonment in the crime of corruption and bribery, and how it should coordinate the relationship between the general principles and sub-provisions of the Criminal Law;How to deal with the relationship between it and other penalties, such as the system of suspended execution of death penalty, the system of life imprisonment and the system of limited commutation of sentence, and so on. These controversial issues need to be studied deeply in the field of criminal law.This article first from the general meaning of life imprisonment theoretical origin, connotation, foreign legal provisions, macro grasp of life imprisonment.Life imprisonment stems from Beccalya's view that abolition of the death penalty can be replaced by life imprisonment.Since then, this view of alternative death penalty has been carried out in the criminal law of some countries, life imprisonment in various forms of legislation in various countries, but there are common points, such as its application is often the object of high personal danger,A criminal who commits a serious crime but does not have to be sentenced to death and who needs to be permanently isolated from society; it is the harshest form of liberty, and the deprivation of liberty is often life-long, but the state of life imprisonment can be altered by commutation, parole or pardon.On the other hand, in our country, life imprisonment is not subject to commutation or parole. Because life imprisonment is to reduce the application of the death penalty by increasing the free sentence, it is in line with the tendency of the development of the penalty, and in addition, our country's criminal policy requires that "corruption be severely punished."Therefore, the introduction of life imprisonment in the process of amending the law has legal, policy and practical value.In order to better realize the above-mentioned value, we must have a further clear definition of the legal attributes of the new life imprisonment in the Criminal Law of our country. From the point of view of the legal provisions themselves,Life imprisonment in our country should be defined as a special penalty measure with both the nature of execution and sentencing depending on the suspended execution of the death penalty and life imprisonment.This paper clarifies its legal attribute, then probes into the application of life imprisonment in our country, and the relationship between it and the general principles and sub-provisions of the Criminal Law, and concludes that life imprisonment has not broken through the arrangement of penalty system, and it is a modification to the general provisions of the Criminal Law.It is the embodiment of inflexibility of the general principle that the sub-rule of Criminal Law makes up for the inflexibility of the general principle. Through this exceptional provision, the Criminal Law can keep pace with the times and give full play to its function of safeguard law.At the same time, the life imprisonment stipulated in the subclause is different from the system of suspended execution of death penalty in the general rule. The system of life imprisonment and limited commutation of sentence has further improved the penalty system of our country, so it is envisaged that life imprisonment should be regarded as a kind of penalty independently.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃明儒;項婷婷;;論《刑法修正案(九)》“終身監(jiān)禁”的性質(zhì)[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2016年05期

2 陳興良;;犯罪范圍的擴張與刑罰結(jié)構(gòu)的調(diào)整——《刑法修正案(九)》述評[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2016年04期

3 李穎;;重貪犯的終身囹圄——對《刑法修正案(九)》第44條第4款的解讀[J];華中師范大學(xué)研究生學(xué)報;2016年02期

4 趙赤;;《刑法修正案(九)》中的終身監(jiān)禁制度探析[J];凈月學(xué)刊;2016年03期

5 王志祥;;貪污、受賄犯罪終身監(jiān)禁制度的立法商榷[J];社會科學(xué)輯刊;2016年03期

6 韓雪;;質(zhì)疑與反思:不得減刑、假釋的終身監(jiān)禁刑的設(shè)置與死刑廢除的關(guān)系探析[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2016年02期

7 黃永維;袁登明;;《刑法修正案(九)》中的終身監(jiān)禁研究[J];法律適用;2016年03期

8 陳興良;;《刑法修正案(九)》的解讀與評論[J];貴州民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2016年01期

9 孫浩文;;淺析“終身監(jiān)禁”入刑之合理性——以刑法目的論為展開[J];中州大學(xué)學(xué)報;2016年01期

10 曾瑞;張宇開;;淺談終身監(jiān)禁入法的意義[J];法制與社會;2016年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 嚴(yán)玉婷;終身監(jiān)禁制度的探究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

2 張浩;終身監(jiān)禁的中國實踐與刑罰改革[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

3 廖嘉成;論我國終身監(jiān)禁的定性與適用[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2016年

4 王國富;我國死緩制度的合理性反思[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

5 姜玉楠;論有限替代死刑的終身監(jiān)禁制度[D];蘇州大學(xué);2013年

6 劉佳;死緩限制減刑制度研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1725888