本文選題：法益刑法保護(hù)前置化　切入點(diǎn)：風(fēng)險(xiǎn)　出處：《河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)中,法益刑法保護(hù)前置化愈加突出,它是危害行為對(duì)法益造成危險(xiǎn)狀態(tài)時(shí)(危險(xiǎn)狀態(tài)能轉(zhuǎn)化為實(shí)害結(jié)果或具有轉(zhuǎn)化為實(shí)害結(jié)果的高度可能性),由刑法提前介入,對(duì)法益進(jìn)行全面的保護(hù)。法益刑法保護(hù)前置化將抽象的法益納入刑法的保護(hù)范圍內(nèi),加強(qiáng)了法益的保護(hù)力度,是對(duì)法益的全面把握。法益刑法保護(hù)前置化在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)下發(fā)展迅速,國(guó)內(nèi)外刑法典上都有關(guān)于法益刑法保護(hù)前置化的內(nèi)容,但是在進(jìn)行法益刑法保護(hù)前置化時(shí)可能會(huì)出現(xiàn)違背刑法的謙抑性原則,不利于人權(quán)保障等問(wèn)題,因此,實(shí)現(xiàn)法益刑法保護(hù)前置化時(shí)需要合理的衡量自由、秩序、法益,對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的認(rèn)識(shí)要結(jié)合風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的總體特征和本國(guó)的實(shí)際狀況,以刑法的理論為根基,通過(guò)合理的依據(jù)和的方式來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)。本文分為三部分:第一部分對(duì)法益刑法保護(hù)前置化進(jìn)行了概述。首先,以風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)為背景介紹法益刑法保護(hù)前置化的擴(kuò)大發(fā)展是源于風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的影響,面對(duì)“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”需要由刑法提前介入實(shí)現(xiàn)法益保護(hù);其次,結(jié)合風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的特征和刑法的目的總結(jié)出法益刑法保護(hù)前置化是為保護(hù)法益、防控風(fēng)險(xiǎn);最后,得出法益刑法保護(hù)前置化的定義。第二部分對(duì)法益刑法保護(hù)前置化作出了理論分析。先是介紹了國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)法益刑法保護(hù)前置化的肯定、中間、否定的態(tài)度,并對(duì)這三種態(tài)度綜合分析,明確了法益刑法保護(hù)前置化是在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的背景下符合了刑事政策,能預(yù)防、控制風(fēng)險(xiǎn),維護(hù)公眾利益、保護(hù)法益。接著從刑法理論上論述法益刑法保護(hù)前置化的理論根據(jù),即法益刑法保護(hù)前置化依然是以結(jié)果無(wú)價(jià)值為支撐并堅(jiān)守了刑法的責(zé)任主義。第三部分概述了法益刑法保護(hù)前置化的實(shí)現(xiàn);首先從理論上、國(guó)內(nèi)外立法表現(xiàn)上、我國(guó)司法的適用上三個(gè)方面介紹法益刑法保護(hù)前置化的實(shí)現(xiàn)依據(jù)。其中理論依據(jù)包括三個(gè)內(nèi)容,第一個(gè)內(nèi)容是風(fēng)險(xiǎn)既包括科技、工業(yè)等發(fā)展帶來(lái)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)也包括現(xiàn)代因素介入導(dǎo)致的傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)中突出的風(fēng)險(xiǎn);第二個(gè)內(nèi)容是危險(xiǎn)是指行為造成的法益的危險(xiǎn),是危險(xiǎn)狀態(tài);第三個(gè)內(nèi)容是法益刑法保護(hù)前置化的適用領(lǐng)域。接著從危險(xiǎn)犯、未遂犯、幫助犯正犯化、持有型犯罪、預(yù)備犯方面介紹法益刑法保護(hù)前置化的實(shí)現(xiàn)方式。
[Abstract]:In the risk society, the preemption of criminal law protection of legal interests becomes more and more prominent. It is the high possibility that the dangerous state can be transformed into the result of actual harm or the result of actual harm can be transformed into the result of actual harm when the harmful behavior causes the dangerous state to the legal interest, and it is intervened in advance by the criminal law.Comprehensive protection of legal interests.The preposition of legal interest criminal law protection brings abstract legal interest into the scope of criminal law protection, strengthens the law interest protection dynamics, is the comprehensive grasp to the law interest.The law interest criminal law protection preposition develops rapidly under the risk society. There is the content of the law interest criminal law protection preposition in the domestic and foreign criminal law, but it may violate the modest restraint principle of the criminal law when carrying on the law interest criminal law protection preposition.Therefore, it is necessary to measure the freedom, order and law interest reasonably when realizing the preposition of the legal interest criminal law protection. The understanding of the risk should be combined with the overall characteristics of the risk society and the actual situation of our country.Take the theory of criminal law as the foundation, through the reasonable basis and the way to realize.This article is divided into three parts: the first part of the legal interests of criminal law protection preposition was summarized.First of all, taking the risk society as the background to introduce the expanded development of the legal interest criminal law protection preposition is derived from the risk society influence, facing the "risk" need the criminal law to intervene in advance to realize the legal interest protection; secondly,Combined with the characteristics of risk society and the purpose of criminal law, the author concludes that the preemption of legal interest and criminal law protection is for the protection of interest, prevention and control of risk; finally, the definition of preemption of legal interest and criminal law protection is obtained.The second part makes the theoretical analysis to the legal interest criminal law protection preposition.First of all, it introduces the positive, intermediate and negative attitude of scholars at home and abroad to the pre-protection of legal interest criminal law, and through the comprehensive analysis of these three attitudes, it makes clear that the preposition of legal interest criminal law protection conforms to the criminal policy under the background of risk society.Can prevent, control the risk, safeguard the public interest, protect the benefit.Then from the theory of criminal law discusses the legal interests of criminal law protection of the theoretical basis, that is, the legal interests of criminal law protection preposition is still based on the result of no value and adhere to the responsibility of criminal law.The third part summarizes the realization of the legal interest criminal law protection preposition. Firstly, it introduces the realization basis of the law interest criminal law protection preposition from the theory, the domestic and foreign legislation performance, our country judicature application three aspects.The theoretical basis includes three contents. The first one is that the risk includes not only the risks brought by the development of science and technology and industry, but also the prominent risks in the traditional society caused by the intervention of modern factors.The second content refers to the danger of the legal interest caused by the act and the dangerous state; the third content is the applicable field of the law interest criminal law protection preposition.Then from the aspects of dangerous crime, attempted crime, aid-offender, possession crime and preparatory crime, this paper introduces the way to realize the preemption of legal interest criminal law protection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫萬(wàn)懷;;違法相對(duì)性理論的崩潰——對(duì)刑法前置化立法傾向的一種批評(píng)[J];政治與法律;2016年03期

2 王曉芳;;刑法中的法益保護(hù)前置化問(wèn)題——環(huán)境刑法維度的思考與應(yīng)對(duì)[J];山西青年管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期

3 姜敏;;法益保護(hù)前置:刑法對(duì)食品安全保護(hù)的路徑選擇——以幫助行為正犯化為研究視角[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年05期

4 王永茜;;論現(xiàn)代刑法擴(kuò)張的新手段——法益保護(hù)的提前化和刑事處罰的前置化[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年06期

5 姚貝;王拓;;法益保護(hù)前置化問(wèn)題研究[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2012年01期

6 郝艷兵;解永照;;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)下刑法的提前保護(hù)[J];江西警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期

7 張明楷;;“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)”若干刑法理論問(wèn)題反思[J];法商研究;2011年05期

8 陳興良;;“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法”與刑法風(fēng)險(xiǎn):雙重視角的考察[J];法商研究;2011年04期

9 齊文遠(yuǎn);;刑法應(yīng)對(duì)社會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)之有所為與有所不為[J];法商研究;2011年04期

10 夏勇;;民生風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的刑法應(yīng)對(duì)[J];法商研究;2011年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王拓;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)刑法理論的現(xiàn)代展開(kāi)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1689161