發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-27 08:20

  本文選題：毒品犯罪　切入點(diǎn)：技偵材料　出處：《四川省社會(huì)科學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著2012年《刑事訴訟法》(以下統(tǒng)稱新《刑事訴訟法》)的修改,為順應(yīng)新形勢(shì)下打擊毒品犯罪的現(xiàn)實(shí)需要,用于證明案件事實(shí)的技術(shù)偵查措施獲取的材料(以下簡(jiǎn)稱技偵材料),經(jīng)過(guò)法院核實(shí)采納,可直接作為訴訟證據(jù)使用,繼而經(jīng)法院核實(shí)認(rèn)定作為定案根據(jù)。根據(jù)新《刑事訴訟法》第48條之規(guī)定,訴訟證據(jù),就毒品犯罪案件而言,系指公安機(jī)關(guān)依照法定的程序收集并固定,能夠證明毒品犯罪案件真實(shí)情況的材料,而技偵材料在毒品犯罪案件審判實(shí)務(wù)中作為證據(jù)使用,主要是指作為定案根據(jù)加以使用。就技偵材料作為毒品犯罪案件定案根據(jù)使用指涉的內(nèi)容,筆者認(rèn)為,主要涵攝程序和實(shí)體兩個(gè)層面:程序?qū)用?集中體現(xiàn)在庭審質(zhì)證程序上,而實(shí)體上,則包括技偵材料在毒品犯罪案件中作為定案根據(jù)證據(jù)能力的審查判斷、證明力的審查判斷(包括作為定罪證據(jù)、量刑證據(jù)的應(yīng)用),以及法院對(duì)證據(jù)的采納。本文基于對(duì)技偵材料作為定案根據(jù)基本語(yǔ)義的理解,結(jié)合其在毒品犯罪案件司法實(shí)踐中的應(yīng)用進(jìn)行問(wèn)題探討。技偵材料作為證明毒品犯罪案件事實(shí)的有效補(bǔ)充,在偵查過(guò)程中被公安機(jī)關(guān)廣泛應(yīng)用,但桎梏于我國(guó)立法體制和現(xiàn)實(shí)土壤,技偵材料作為定案根據(jù)在毒品犯罪案件審判實(shí)務(wù)中一直存在問(wèn)題,致使技偵材料的應(yīng)用步履維艱,爭(zhēng)議不斷。契合當(dāng)前我國(guó)庭審實(shí)質(zhì)化改革背景,本文試著從技偵材料作為定案根據(jù)在毒品犯罪案件中的實(shí)務(wù)使用出發(fā),對(duì)其中涉及技偵材料作為定案根據(jù)的庭審質(zhì)證方式、技偵材料作為定案根據(jù)證據(jù)能力的審查判斷、證明力的審查判斷(包括作為定罪證據(jù)、量刑證據(jù)的應(yīng)用),以及法院對(duì)證據(jù)的采納進(jìn)行一定的問(wèn)題研究,重點(diǎn)闡述庭審階段技偵材料作為定案根據(jù)的應(yīng)用問(wèn)題,本文共分為三個(gè)部分:第一章:技偵措施的范圍界定與技偵材料的審查問(wèn)題。因技偵措施采取的不同,相應(yīng)獲取的技偵材料審查判斷側(cè)重點(diǎn)也不盡相同,于此,本部分重點(diǎn)對(duì)技偵措施在我國(guó)的應(yīng)用進(jìn)行一定的范圍界定,認(rèn)為包括通訊監(jiān)聽(tīng)、秘密拍照及秘密錄音錄像、隱匿身份偵查(如誘惑偵查)、特情介入(如線人)、控制下交付等技術(shù)偵查手段,同時(shí)歸納技偵材料具有與其他證據(jù)材料不同的特點(diǎn),并述及不同類型技偵材料審查判斷的重點(diǎn)所在,以及揭露理論層面存在的問(wèn)題。第二章:審判實(shí)務(wù)中技偵材料作為定案根據(jù)的應(yīng)用現(xiàn)狀考察。首先闡述了毒品犯罪的特征。毒品犯罪具有與其他類型刑事犯罪案件不同的特點(diǎn),表現(xiàn)為毒品犯罪案件從偵查收集證據(jù)材料到最終法庭審理證據(jù)材料的使用都有其獨(dú)特之處。同時(shí)通過(guò)統(tǒng)計(jì)新《刑事訴訟法》修訂以來(lái)中國(guó)裁判文書(shū)網(wǎng)上公布的技偵材料在毒品犯罪一審案件中作為定案根據(jù)的應(yīng)用情況及實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題。歸納言之,筆者認(rèn)為,可分為程序與實(shí)體兩個(gè)層面。程序?qū)用?集中體現(xiàn)在技偵材料作為定案根據(jù)的庭審質(zhì)證設(shè)計(jì)上,實(shí)體而言,則包括技偵材料作為定案根據(jù)證據(jù)能力的審查判斷、證明力的審查判斷(作為定罪證據(jù)、量刑證據(jù)的應(yīng)用),以及法院對(duì)證據(jù)的采納與否等方面。第三章:技偵材料作為定案根據(jù)使用的完善建議。該部分順應(yīng)庭審實(shí)質(zhì)化改革之勢(shì)而動(dòng),結(jié)合我國(guó)毒品犯罪案件審判實(shí)務(wù),分別從程序與實(shí)體層面展開(kāi)論述。具體言之,包括明確技偵材料的使用范圍、完善技偵材料現(xiàn)行質(zhì)證方式,特別是對(duì)技偵材料作為定案根據(jù)的庭外核實(shí)程序進(jìn)行了建構(gòu),明晰技偵材料作為定案根據(jù)證據(jù)能力的審查判斷、規(guī)范證明力的審查判斷(包括作為定罪證據(jù)、量刑證據(jù)的應(yīng)用),以及完善法院對(duì)證據(jù)的采納規(guī)則,讓法庭正義以人們看得見(jiàn)的方式實(shí)現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:With the 2012 "Criminal Procedure Law" (hereinafter referred to as the new "criminal procedural law") modified to adapt to the new situation to fight against drug crimes in reality, used to obtain measures of technical investigation prove the facts of the case materials (hereinafter referred to as technical investigation materials), after the court to verify the adoption, can be directly used as evidence in litigation, and then as a final decision by the court to verify that according to the new criminal procedure law. According to the < > forty-eighth regulation, litigation evidence, drug crime case, refers to the public security organs in accordance with the legal procedures were collected and fixed, drug crime can prove the real situation of the case materials, and technical investigation materials in practice as a trial of drug crime the use of evidence, mainly refers to the use of it. As a final decision according to the technical investigation materials as drug crime case verdict according to the use of referential content, the author thinks that the main subsumtion procedure and entity layer two Surface: program level, embodied in the court hearing procedure, and the entity, including technical investigation materials as the verdict based on the evidence the ability to review the drug-related criminal cases, judge the probative force (including conviction as evidence, sentencing evidence, the court on the application) and the adoption of evidence. In this paper. According to the investigation material as the verdict on the basis of understanding the basic semantics, combined with its application in drug crime cases in the judicial practice problems discussed. Technical investigation materials as evidenced by effective supplement of drug crime case, the public security organs have been widely used in the course of the investigation, but limited to the legislative system in our country and the reality of the soil, Jizhen as material according to the existing problems in the practice has been a trial of drug crime, resulting in the application of technical investigation materials said of an aged person, with current controversy. The essence of the trial reform of the background of this paper. Try from the technical investigation materials as the verdict according to the practice in drug crime cases of the related technical investigation materials as yet based on cross examination method, technical investigation materials as the verdict based on the evidence ability examination, judgment of probative force (including conviction as evidence, sentencing evidence, and application) the adoption of the evidence of the trial focused on technical investigation materials as finalized according to the application, this paper is divided into three parts: Chapter One: the definition of the scope of technical investigation review of measures and technical investigation materials. Because of the different measures taken to the technical investigation, technical investigation materials examination the corresponding focus is not the same, for this, this part focuses on the measures of technical investigation in our country certain scope, including communication monitor, camera and video recording secret secret, hidden Anonymous identity investigation (such as the temptation investigation), special intervention (such as informants), under the control of delivery and other technical means of investigation, also summarized the technical investigation material has different characteristics with other evidence, and the key to determine the types and technical investigation materials review the theory and Neo exposing level problems. The second chapter: the technical investigation and trial practice materials as the verdict application according to the status quo of study. First elaborates the characteristics of drug crime. Drug crime has different characteristics from other types of criminal cases, for drug-related criminal cases collected from the investigation certificate according to the use of materials to the final court of evidence has its uniqueness. At the same time the new statistics "since the amendment of Criminal Procedure Law > China judgment documents published online technical investigation materials as the application according to the existing decision and practice questions in the trial of drug crime cases. To be, I think, can be divided into two aspects of entity and procedure. The procedure level, embodied in the technical investigation materials as the verdict court hearing according to the design, entities, including technical investigation materials as the verdict based on the evidence ability examination, proof examination judgment (used as evidence for conviction sentencing evidence, as well as the court), the adoption of evidence and other aspects. The third chapter: the technical investigation materials as the verdict according to the use of the suggestions. This part conforms to the essence of the trial reform of the situation and move, combined with the case of drug crime in our country judicial practice, respectively from the aspects of procedure and entity specific words. Clearly, including technical investigation materials use, improve the existing quality / technical investigation materials, especially for technical investigation materials as the verdict of court according to the verification procedures of construction materials, clear Jizhen as verdict according to the evidence The ability of examination and judgement, the examination and judgement of normative proof power, including the application of sentencing evidence as a conviction evidence, and the improvement of court's adoption rules for evidence, enable Court justice to be realized in a visible way.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川省社會(huì)科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 李曉林;趙丹;;毒品犯罪案件中技術(shù)偵查證據(jù)的審查和運(yùn)用[J];人民司法(案例);2016年17期

2 程雷;;誘惑偵查的程序控制[J];法學(xué)研究;2015年01期

3 李彬;袁朝霞;周海燕;謝露;;中越邊境地區(qū)涉毒洗錢犯罪研究[J];區(qū)域金融研究;2012年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 雷曉龍;新刑訴法背景下我國(guó)技術(shù)偵查措施的適用及完善[D];西北大學(xué);2015年

2 羅迪;美國(guó)特殊偵查制度對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[D];浙江工商大學(xué);2012年

3 王曉艷;技術(shù)偵查制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1670744