本文選題：城市管理　切入點：行政處罰　出處：《鄭州大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代社會的發(fā)展需要政府提供全面、優(yōu)質的公共服務,行政機關只有擁有一定的行政自由裁量權,才能適應發(fā)展的需要。但在實踐過程中,行政自由裁量權存在于行政行為的各個環(huán)節(jié)中,裁量空間偏大,易被濫用,對行政相對人的合法權益造成損害,進而損害法律的效力和權威,因此對行政自由裁量權的控制便成為了行政法學界討論研究的熱點問題。近年來,在行政自由裁量權控制的理論和實踐研究中,行政處罰自由裁量權基準制度以其特有的優(yōu)勢引起了人們的普遍關注,在全國范圍內廣泛運用,通過實踐證明了其自身存在的價值。但畢竟行政自由裁量權基準制度產(chǎn)生時間較短,在理論研究和實踐經(jīng)驗積累方面明顯不足,所以其自身存在的問題也是不容忽視的。為了便于研究,筆者特意選取了較為典型的城市管理綜合執(zhí)法領域行政處罰自由裁量權作為切入點,直面當前城市管理所面臨的種種難題,通過詳細剖析自由裁量權基準制度在城市管理行政處罰中的存在價值和理論、實踐中的困惑,繼而提出完善方案,以期改變當前城市管理綜合執(zhí)法所面臨的“管與不管皆受質疑”的尷尬境地,從而實現(xiàn)攤販的生存權、城管執(zhí)法人員管理權和城市公共秩序的合理平衡。
[Abstract]:The development of modern society requires the government to provide comprehensive and high-quality public services. Only when the administrative organs have certain administrative discretion, can they adapt to the needs of development. The administrative discretion exists in every link of the administrative act. The discretion space is too large and easy to be abused, which damages the legal rights and interests of the administrative counterpart, and then damages the validity and authority of the law. Therefore, the control of administrative discretion has become a hot issue in the field of administrative law. In recent years, in the theory and practice of administrative discretion control, With its unique advantages, the benchmark system of discretion of administrative punishment has aroused widespread concern and has been widely used throughout the country. It has proved its own existence value through the practice, but after all, the administrative discretion standard system produces the time is short, in the theory research and the practice experience accumulation aspect obviously lacks, So its own problems can not be ignored. In order to facilitate the study, the author has chosen the relatively typical discretion of administrative punishment in the field of comprehensive law enforcement of urban management as the starting point. Facing all kinds of difficult problems that the city management faces at present, through the detailed analysis of the value and theory of the standard system of discretion in the administrative punishment of the city management, the puzzlement in practice, and then put forward the perfect plan. The purpose of this paper is to change the awkward situation of "management or doubt" faced by the comprehensive law enforcement of urban management at present, so as to achieve a reasonable balance between the rights of vendors, the management power of urban management law enforcement personnel and the public order of the city.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陳碧紅;;論城管行政自由裁量權的控制對策[J];廣西社會科學;2014年03期

2 高秦偉;;論行政裁量的自我拘束[J];當代法學;2014年01期

3 關保英;;行政自由裁量基準質疑[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2013年03期

4 戴建華;;裁量基準效力研究[J];法學評論;2012年02期

5 杜健榮;;行政處罰自由裁量基準設定的合理化[J];南都學壇;2012年01期

6 黃學賢;;行政裁量基準:理論、實踐與出路[J];甘肅行政學院學報;2009年06期

7 鄭文兵;;行政處罰自由裁量權的行使與控制[J];佳木斯大學社會科學學報;2009年06期

8 王錫鋅;;行政自由裁量權控制的四個模型——兼論中國行政自由裁量權控制模式的選擇[J];北大法律評論;2009年02期

9 王春業(yè);;論基準制度及其法制化——以行政處罰為例[J];河北法學;2009年06期

10 桂步祥;論行政自由裁量權及其法律規(guī)制[J];江蘇廣播電視大學學報;2002年04期

，

本文編號：1667712