本文選題：公共自行車交通系統(tǒng)　切入點(diǎn)：新公共服務(wù)　出處：《西藏大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：21世紀(jì)初公共自行車在西歐國家興起并在世界上主要國家得到極大的普及,我國的一些城市例如北京、上海、杭州、武漢、廣州等也進(jìn)行了相關(guān)的探索和實(shí)踐,并初步取得了一定的成果。在2016年底,共享單車異軍突起,憑借其私人運(yùn)營、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+、信用租賃等優(yōu)勢,迅速占領(lǐng)了諸如北京、廣州等一二線城市市場,極有對公共自行車取而代之之勢。私人運(yùn)營因?yàn)槠渥分鹄麧櫟谋举|(zhì)所在,在帶來了一些便利的同時,也存在很多限制。比如,共享單車的發(fā)展方向主要集中于大中型城市,對于人口基數(shù)、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)普及程度等要件有著極高的依賴性。而就這些限制要素來說,拉薩對于共享單車項(xiàng)目的民營資本的吸引力是相對薄弱的,政府運(yùn)營仍然是拉薩公共自行車項(xiàng)目的主要方式。自2013年末,拉薩市公共自行車交通系統(tǒng)上線以來,經(jīng)過近三年的運(yùn)行,取得了一定成績,但同時也暴露出了很多問題,利用率不高首當(dāng)其沖,其次是租賃站點(diǎn)的設(shè)置,不同租賃站點(diǎn)的存車數(shù)量等都與民眾的現(xiàn)實(shí)需求之間存在誤差,尤其值得注意的是,在之前的三年中,對于使用公共自行車的人群中,游客都占了一半以上的比例。拉薩作為以旅游業(yè)為主要支撐產(chǎn)業(yè)的城市,游客對于拉薩的重要性不言而喻。本文通過對拉薩市目前的公共自行車交通系統(tǒng)所呈現(xiàn)的問題以及弊端的分析,并基于新公共服務(wù)理論視角下進(jìn)行分析問題所在的根本,以及對于共享單車優(yōu)勢的借鑒得出相應(yīng)的改進(jìn)措施。以期可以促進(jìn)目前拉薩市公共自行車?yán)寐什桓叩慕鉀Q。
[Abstract]:In the early 21st century, public bicycles rose in western European countries and gained great popularity in major countries in the world. Some cities in China, such as Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Wuhan, Guangzhou, and so on, have also made relevant exploration and practice. At the end of 2016, sharing bicycles rose to the fore, and by virtue of their advantages of private operation, Internet, credit leasing, and so on, they quickly occupied the market in the first and second tier cities such as Beijing and Guangzhou. Private operations, because of their profit-seeking nature, have brought some convenience but also a lot of restrictions. For example, the development of shared bikes is mainly concentrated in large and medium-sized cities. Lhasa is highly dependent on such elements as population base, Internet popularity, and so on. But in terms of these restrictions, Lhasa's attractiveness to private capital sharing bicycle projects is relatively weak. The government operation is still the main way of the public bicycle project in Lhasa. Since the Lhasa public bicycle transportation system went online in late 2013, after nearly three years of operation, it has made some achievements, but at the same time it has exposed many problems. The low utilization rate bears the brunt, followed by the setting up of rental sites, the number of cars stored at different rental sites and the actual needs of the public. It is particularly noteworthy that in the previous three years, there has been an error between the number of cars stored at different sites and the actual needs of the public. Tourists account for more than half of the people who use public bicycles. Lhasa, a city where tourism is the main supporting industry, The importance of tourists to Lhasa is self-evident. Through the analysis of the problems and drawbacks of Lhasa's current public bicycle transportation system, and based on the perspective of the new public service theory, this paper analyzes the root of the problem. And the corresponding improvement measures for sharing bicycle advantage are put forward in order to promote the low utilization ratio of public bicycle in Lhasa.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西藏大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D669.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱敏,鄒南昌,周美玲;對天津市區(qū)自行車交通的思考和建議[J];城市;2003年03期

2 ;市委辦公廳 市政府辦公廳印發(fā)《關(guān)于加強(qiáng)公共自行車交通系統(tǒng)建設(shè)和管理的實(shí)施意見》的通知[J];杭州政報(bào);2008年07期

3 ;關(guān)于整頓自行車交通秩序問題的會議紀(jì)要[J];廣州市政;1989年04期

4 ;轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)市整治目行車交通領(lǐng)導(dǎo)小組辦公室關(guān)于近期開展自行車交通治理工作的意見的通知[J];廣州市政;1989年08期

5 ;關(guān)于機(jī)關(guān)干部繼續(xù)參加整治自行車交通秩序執(zhí)勤的通知[J];廣州市政;1989年12期

6 周慶祿,姜瑩;試論城市自行車使用管理[J];公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2002年03期

7 黃志生;盧家耀;王正安;;自行車行駛狀態(tài)推定——摩托車與自行車交通事故重建一例分析[J];廣東公安科技;2007年03期

8 ;本市聚焦[J];杭州通訊(下半月);2008年03期

9 楊繼繩;“自行車王國”的苦惱和出路[J];w蕓，

本文編號：1657321