本文選題：新聞聚合　切入點(diǎn)：著作權(quán)　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的發(fā)展,新聞行業(yè)發(fā)生巨大的變化。為了迎合人們對新聞信息的個性化需求,新聞聚合出現(xiàn)并迅速擴(kuò)張,擠占了傳統(tǒng)媒體的市場。一方面,傳統(tǒng)媒體正面臨轉(zhuǎn)型的壓力,另一方面又遭遇互聯(lián)網(wǎng)新聞聚合的挑戰(zhàn)。其中有一些傳統(tǒng)媒體認(rèn)為新聞聚合服務(wù)提供商沒有經(jīng)過許可,擅自使用了他們生產(chǎn)的內(nèi)容,并且偷走了原本屬于自己的廣告收入。而新聞聚合服務(wù)提供商認(rèn)為標(biāo)題和摘要并不具備獨(dú)創(chuàng)性,是不受著作權(quán)法保護(hù)的,同時聚合行為符合合理使用制度,并且技術(shù)是中立的,不應(yīng)當(dāng)貼上“違法”的標(biāo)簽。在近二十多年,著作權(quán)沖突在不同的國家和地區(qū)不斷發(fā)生,歐美主要國家和日本、澳大利亞等都曾出現(xiàn)過這類案件。尤其是谷歌在全球擴(kuò)張的過程中,因其聚合行為而卷入紛爭。對于新聞聚合的著作權(quán)案件,不同的法院持有不同的觀點(diǎn),從而做出了不同的判決,有支持傳統(tǒng)媒體的,也有支持新聞聚合的。另外,廣大的學(xué)者也參與其中進(jìn)行了廣泛而激烈的討論。新聞聚合著作權(quán)矛盾的本質(zhì)其實(shí)是新舊新聞媒體爭奪新市場所帶來的利益沖突,是新聞聚合商與傳統(tǒng)媒體之間的博弈。對于雙方來說,共贏才是勝利,任何一方的獨(dú)大都是輸。為了應(yīng)對新聞聚合這一新事物所帶來的著作權(quán)問題,在傳統(tǒng)媒體的推動下有些國家和地區(qū)選擇修改法律維護(hù)其利益,比如德國和西班牙;有些則是利用原來的法律作出全新的判決,比如美國和歐盟。這些做法有利也有弊。對于我國來說,都有一定的參考價值。除了利用法律解決新聞聚合的著作權(quán)沖突,也可以充分發(fā)揮著作權(quán)集體管理制度的作用,充分的發(fā)揮技術(shù)的作用�？傊�,對待新聞聚合,要平衡好背后的利益關(guān)系,不能偏廢其一。整篇論文分為四個部分,首先對新聞聚合的產(chǎn)生和影響做了簡單的介紹,并且對不同形式的新聞聚合行為做了歸納,然后分析了新聞聚合行為的法律結(jié)構(gòu),達(dá)到明確概念、了解背景的作用,為之后著作權(quán)沖突的介紹做好鋪墊;然后是主體部分,著重對著作權(quán)沖突中的主體爭議、客體爭議和技術(shù)爭議進(jìn)行研究論述,采取案例和分析的方式進(jìn)行;緊接著是對目前各個國家和地區(qū)怎樣應(yīng)對著作權(quán)問題進(jìn)行了介紹;最后是結(jié)論和建議,作為對研究的總結(jié)。本篇論文采用了案例分析法為主,結(jié)合實(shí)證分析法和比較分析法進(jìn)行論證,并且是在閱讀了大量的外國案例的情況下動筆的,以歐洲法院、美國和澳大利亞的判例為主,同時結(jié)合中國目前國內(nèi)一些有關(guān)于新聞聚合的典型案例,力圖做到全面的討論。
[Abstract]:With the development of the Internet, great changes have taken place in the news industry. In order to cater to the individualized demand for news information, news aggregation has appeared and expanded rapidly, which has taken over the market of traditional media. On the one hand, Traditional media are under pressure to transform, and on the other hand face the challenge of Internet news aggregation. Some of the traditional media believe that news aggregating service providers use the content they produce without permission. And stole their own advertising revenue. However, the news aggregating service providers believe that the headlines and abstracts are not original and are not protected by copyright law, and that the aggregation behavior conforms to the system of rational use, and the technology is neutral. It should not be labeled "illegal". In the past 20 years, copyright conflicts have occurred in different countries and regions, major countries in Europe and America and Japan, There have been cases of this kind in Australia, especially when Google has been involved in disputes over its aggregation in the process of global expansion. Different courts have different views on the copyright cases of news aggregates. As a result, different judgments were made, ranging from those who supported traditional media to those who supported news aggregations. In addition, The vast number of scholars also participated in the extensive and intense discussion. The essence of the contradiction of copyright in news aggregation is in fact the conflict of interest brought about by the competition for the new market between the old and the new news media. It's a game between news aggregators and traditional media. To both sides, a win-win situation is a victory, and either side is a loser. In order to deal with the copyright problem brought about by this new thing of news aggregation, Driven by the traditional media, some countries and regions choose to amend their laws to safeguard their interests, such as Germany and Spain; others use the original laws to make new judgments. For example, the United States and the European Union. These practices have advantages and disadvantages. For our country, they all have certain reference value. In addition to using the law to resolve the copyright conflict of news aggregation, they can also give full play to the role of the copyright collective management system. Give full play to the role of technology. In a word, to deal with news aggregation, we must balance the interests behind it. The whole paper is divided into four parts. First of all, it gives a brief introduction to the emergence and impact of news aggregation. And has made the induction to the different forms of news aggregation behavior, then has analyzed the news aggregation behavior legal structure, has reached the clear concept, understood the background function, has made the foundation for the later copyright conflict introduction; then is the main part, Focus on the subject dispute, object dispute and technology dispute in the copyright conflict, take the method of case and analysis, and then introduce how to deal with the copyright problem in each country and region at present. The last part is conclusion and suggestion, as a summary of the research. This paper mainly uses case analysis, combined with empirical analysis and comparative analysis to demonstrate, and is in the case of reading a large number of foreign cases. Taking the European Court of Justice, the United States and Australia as the main cases, and combining with some typical cases of news aggregation in China at present, this paper tries to achieve a comprehensive discussion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王素;;新聞作品權(quán)利歸屬與行使中的利益平衡──以新聞媒體內(nèi)部的版權(quán)法律關(guān)系為視角[J];出版廣角;2016年15期

2 袁曉新;;從版權(quán)紛爭到版權(quán)合作──談新聞聚合版權(quán)問題的解決[J];出版廣角;2016年13期

3 姚海波;;關(guān)于新聞聚合服務(wù)與版權(quán)保護(hù)的思考[J];出版廣角;2016年12期

4 曹麗萍;;“新聞搬運(yùn)工”的侵權(quán)風(fēng)險[J];今日財富(中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán));2016年04期

5 呂云虹;;新聞聚合的三種模式[J];新聞世界;2016年01期

6 邵國松;;新聞聚合的版權(quán)問題研究[J];南京社會科學(xué);2015年05期

7 陳舒獻(xiàn);;夾縫中的生存:“今日頭條”著作權(quán)問題探析[J];傳播與版權(quán);2015年05期

8 王清;唐伶俐;;芻議網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息聚合服務(wù)的版權(quán)問題[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2015年01期

9 王遷;;論《著作權(quán)法》中“時事新聞”的含義[J];中國版權(quán);2014年01期

10 劉海虹;;歐盟網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的著作權(quán)限制制度協(xié)調(diào)的困境——以歐洲法院(ECJ)Infopaq案為視角[J];河南教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 魯世軍;作品獨(dú)創(chuàng)性問題研究[D];廣東財經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

2 黃昱緋;新聞聚合行為的法律責(zé)任研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

3 李早;論美國著作權(quán)合理使用制度[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

4 陳婧;新聞作品的著作權(quán)問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1628689