本文選題：公務(wù)員考試　切入點(diǎn)：考錄制度　出處：《南京大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在公務(wù)員制度的各項(xiàng)環(huán)節(jié)中,作為"進(jìn)"這一環(huán)節(jié)的公務(wù)員考錄制度,對(duì)于精英選拔、階層流動(dòng)和政治認(rèn)同等皆具有重要的意義。我國(guó)公務(wù)員考錄制度經(jīng)過近幾十年的發(fā)展,初步建立了完整的框架。作為公務(wù)員制度的重要組成部分,直接影響著國(guó)家機(jī)器的正常運(yùn)行和工作效率,關(guān)系著政府工作人員勤政廉政,關(guān)系著政府在人民心目中的形象,關(guān)系著國(guó)家各項(xiàng)事業(yè)的興衰成敗。近年來,公務(wù)員考錄制度進(jìn)行了多重改革,總體方向明確,重心突出,在突出招考平等、注重信息公開、提升用人效率等維度,取得了不俗的進(jìn)展,制度效用和公眾評(píng)價(jià)都有顯著改進(jìn)。然而在考錄制度的運(yùn)行環(huán)節(jié),仍然存在一定的執(zhí)行偏差,主要表現(xiàn)在四個(gè)方面。一是進(jìn)出通道的設(shè)計(jì)還比較模糊,公務(wù)員范圍和分類界定不清,公務(wù)員更新出口機(jī)制不暢;二是權(quán)利救濟(jì)的處置還比較弱化,考錄程序保障缺失,監(jiān)督投訴機(jī)制虛設(shè);三是考試技術(shù)的效用還不夠明朗,考試層次和級(jí)別劃分簡(jiǎn)約,考試科目和內(nèi)容重知識(shí)輕實(shí)踐;四是公眾心理的困難感知還不少,例如考試費(fèi)用高昂,報(bào)考志愿單一等。造成上述偏差的主要原因在于運(yùn)行環(huán)節(jié)內(nèi)生的三組悖論,即:統(tǒng)一考試與多元需求的矛盾、考試標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化和考生個(gè)性化的矛盾、制度公平與用人效率的矛盾。完善現(xiàn)行公務(wù)員考錄制度,應(yīng)考慮如何將不同利益主體的考量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行有效排序,可以從優(yōu)化考試技術(shù)、加強(qiáng)監(jiān)督體系、改善制度設(shè)計(jì)三個(gè)層面入手。采用分級(jí)分類考試,構(gòu)建多元化的社會(huì)監(jiān)督,推動(dòng)公考資格化進(jìn)程,建立全國(guó)統(tǒng)一考試制度等。
[Abstract]:In the various aspects of the civil service system, as "the civil service examination system in this part, for the selection of elite mobility, and political identity is of vital significance. The civil service examination system in China after decades of development, initially established a complete frame. As an important part of the civil service system. Directly affects the normal operation of the state machine and the working efficiency, with the government staff diligent and honest, the relationship between the government image in the minds of the people, the relationship between the state and the cause of success or failure. In recent years, the reform of the civil service examination system for multiple, the overall direction is clear, the focus is outstanding, outstanding equality in recruitment, pay attention to information disclosure, enhance the efficiency of one dimension, has made good progress in the system and the public utility evaluation are significantly improved. However, in the operation process of examination system, there are still a The deviation of the implementation, mainly in four aspects. One is the design of import channel is still relatively vague, unclear definition and scope of civil servants classification of civil servants, update the export mechanism is not smooth; the two is the right remedy disposal is relatively weak, the lack of security supervision and examination procedures, the complaint mechanism three is substantial; the effectiveness of test technology not clear, examination level and grade contracted, examination subjects and content of knowledge and practice of light; the four is the public perception of many of the psychological difficulties, such as the high cost of the exam, candidates volunteer single. The reasons for the deviation is three group paradox, namely: the inner link of the operation examination and the diverse needs of the unity of opposites the contradiction between standardization and examination, candidates personalized, system fairness and efficiency. With the contradiction between people and improve the existing civil service examination system, should consider how to different stakeholders are considered standard Effective sorting can start from three levels: optimizing examination technology, strengthening supervision system and improving system design. We should adopt graded and classified examinations, build diversified social supervision, promote the qualification process of public examination, and set up a unified national examination system.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D630.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 陳芳;盛艷燕;;公務(wù)員面試考官評(píng)分策略研究[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2016年03期

2 王文成;;考選公平:我國(guó)公考制度科學(xué)化的路徑選擇[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年10期

3 邢占軍;曹東卿;;公務(wù)員考錄資格審查的梳理與思考[J];行政論壇;2013年04期

4 李業(yè)旗;王秀穎;;公務(wù)員考試中人才測(cè)評(píng)技術(shù)問題的應(yīng)對(duì)[J];人民論壇;2012年36期

5 江正平;楊振業(yè);;公考考生維權(quán)的困境與對(duì)策[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)科學(xué);2012年15期

6 練崇潮;;我國(guó)公務(wù)員考錄面試環(huán)節(jié)制度安排的再思考[J];前沿;2010年20期

7 徐元善;江悅;;新制度社會(huì)學(xué)視角下我國(guó)公務(wù)員考錄制度的缺陷與改善[J];探索;2009年05期

8 李文鈺;王經(jīng)北;;公務(wù)員面試旁聽制度初探[J];牡丹江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

9 韓敏霞;韓敏波;馮正友;;建立國(guó)家統(tǒng)一公務(wù)員考試制度的構(gòu)想[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2007年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：1583438