本文關(guān)鍵詞： 流質(zhì)契約 禁止 擔(dān)保 利益安排　出處：《煙臺(tái)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：流質(zhì)契約是指在抵押合同或質(zhì)押合同訂立的過(guò)程中約定,債務(wù)人在債務(wù)履行期限屆滿(mǎn)未能履行清償義務(wù),則債權(quán)人直接取得抵押物或質(zhì)物所有權(quán)的條款。世界上許多國(guó)家特別是大陸法系國(guó)家對(duì)流質(zhì)契約采取禁止的態(tài)度,我國(guó)受大陸法系的國(guó)家影響較為深遠(yuǎn),對(duì)流質(zhì)契約也持有同樣的態(tài)度,在《物權(quán)法》和《擔(dān)保法》中予以明文禁止。但是,現(xiàn)在許多國(guó)家學(xué)者已對(duì)其提出了質(zhì)疑,并且從一些國(guó)家對(duì)待流質(zhì)契約的態(tài)度和立法來(lái)看,流質(zhì)契約解禁已經(jīng)是大勢(shì)所趨,對(duì)流質(zhì)契約加以許可已經(jīng)成為了世界的主流觀(guān)點(diǎn)。因此,我國(guó)對(duì)于解禁流質(zhì)契約也勢(shì)在必行。文章從流質(zhì)契約的概念和特征等基本問(wèn)題入手,論述了我國(guó)的立法現(xiàn)狀,并且與域外的立法進(jìn)行比較分析,從民法的基本原則、法理、市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)等諸多方面對(duì)禁止流質(zhì)契約進(jìn)行反思,論述了流質(zhì)契約的必要性和可行性。對(duì)流質(zhì)契約解禁之后也面臨這諸多的問(wèn)題,以各方當(dāng)事人的利益安排為視角,通過(guò)借鑒現(xiàn)有的法律規(guī)定和自行設(shè)計(jì)對(duì)流質(zhì)契約制度進(jìn)行構(gòu)造,充分發(fā)揮流質(zhì)契約的有利之處,并且合理維護(hù)各方當(dāng)事人的利益。
[Abstract]:A liquid contract refers to the agreement in the course of the conclusion of a mortgage contract or a pledge contract that the debtor fails to discharge its obligations at the expiration of the time limit for performance of the debt, Many countries in the world, especially the countries of the continental law system, adopt a prohibited attitude towards fluid contracts, and our country is deeply influenced by the countries of the civil law system. They hold the same attitude towards fluid contracts, which are expressly prohibited in the property Law and the guarantee Law. However, many scholars in many countries have now questioned them, and from the perspective of the attitude and legislation of some countries towards fluid contracts, The release of fluid contract has been the trend of the times, and the licensing of liquid contract has become the mainstream view in the world. Therefore, it is imperative for our country to release the liquid contract. This paper starts with the concept and characteristics of fluid contract, and so on. This paper discusses the current situation of legislation in our country, and compares it with the legislation of foreign countries, and reflects on the prohibition of fluid contract from the basic principles of civil law, legal theory, market economy and so on. This paper discusses the necessity and feasibility of the fluid contract. After the release of the liquid contract, it also faces these problems, taking the benefit arrangement of the parties as the angle of view. By drawing lessons from the existing laws and regulations and designing the system of fluid contract by ourselves, we can give full play to the advantages of fluid contract, and protect the interests of the parties concerned reasonably.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 張愛(ài)珍;;對(duì)禁止流質(zhì)契約必要性的現(xiàn)實(shí)考量[J];人民司法;2015年11期

2 劉俊;;流質(zhì)約款的再生[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2006年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1534120