發(fā)布時間：2018-01-25 02:09

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 私人安保公司 走出去 保安服務(wù)管理條例 蒙特勒文件 比較研究　出處：《浙江大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：隨著我國經(jīng)濟的不斷發(fā)展和"走出去"戰(zhàn)略的進一步推進,我國境外經(jīng)濟利益不斷增長。但與此同時,我國境外投資企業(yè)和從業(yè)人員依然面臨著諸多傳統(tǒng)威脅和非傳統(tǒng)威脅。目前我國政府通過政治手段、外交手段、領(lǐng)事保護以及國際組織斡旋等方式打造的境外安保體系難以滿足境外投資企業(yè)和從業(yè)人員巨大的安全需求。因此,尋求政府之外的安保服務(wù)勢在必行。從世界其它國家的經(jīng)驗來看,利用私人安保公司來維護境外利益是比較普遍的做法。我國在2009年頒布了《保安服務(wù)管理條例》來規(guī)范安保服務(wù)行業(yè),但這一條例主要針對國內(nèi)的安保服務(wù)市場,對于安保公司能否在境外為客戶提供安保服務(wù)以及以什么樣的形式和方式提供這樣的服務(wù),我國法律沒有相關(guān)的規(guī)定。這無疑阻礙了我國安保服務(wù)業(yè)的國際化進程。本文通過對國內(nèi)法律、國際相關(guān)法規(guī)和文件的分析和梳理,提出目前我國私人安保公司在"走出去"提供境外安保服務(wù)的過程中遇到的主要法律問題,也即:經(jīng)營資質(zhì)、經(jīng)營領(lǐng)域、從業(yè)原則、權(quán)益保護及責任追究、行業(yè)自律和武器使用等。并通過對比研究歐美發(fā)達國家、日本、我國香港和臺灣地區(qū)的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定,以期對我國相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的法律建制提供一些積極的借鑒。最后,文章分別以我國政府為主體、以私人安保公司為主體、以國際組織為主體和以安保服務(wù)所在國為主體提供一些對策和建議。對我國政府而言,不僅要尋求國內(nèi)法的突破,也要積極吸收國際法規(guī)及相關(guān)文件的成果,努力與國際接軌;對私人安保公司而言,不僅要加強內(nèi)部制度建設(shè)、人才培養(yǎng)和技術(shù)研發(fā),也要向國際同行看齊,努力提高自身的國際競爭力;對國際組織而言,應(yīng)該努力推動《蒙特勒文件》具有國際法律約束力;對安保服務(wù)所在國來說,不僅要構(gòu)建國內(nèi)安保法律體系,同時應(yīng)該構(gòu)建與國際法律和投資者母國法律的接洽機制和沖突處理機制。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of our economy and the further promotion of the "going out" strategy, the economic interests of our country outside our country are constantly increasing, but at the same time. China's overseas investment enterprises and practitioners still face many traditional and non-traditional threats. At present, our government through political means, diplomatic means. Consular protection and the mediation of international organizations such as the creation of offshore security system is difficult to meet the huge security needs of overseas investment enterprises and practitioners. It is imperative to seek security services outside the government. From the experience of the rest of the world. It is a common practice to use private security companies to safeguard foreign interests. In 2009, our country promulgated "Security Service Management regulations" to regulate the security service industry. This regulation, however, is aimed primarily at the domestic security services market, as to whether security companies can provide security services to their clients abroad and in what form and in what manner. There are no relevant provisions in Chinese law. This undoubtedly hinders the internationalization of our security service industry. This paper analyzes and combs the domestic laws, international laws and regulations and documents. This paper puts forward the main legal problems encountered by private security companies in China in the process of "going out" to provide overseas security services, that is, business qualifications, business fields, employment principles, protection of rights and interests and accountability. Industry self-discipline and the use of weapons. And through a comparative study of Europe and the United States developed countries, Japan, China's Hong Kong and Taiwan area related laws and regulations. In order to provide some positive reference to the legal system in related fields of our country. Finally, the article takes our government as the main body and the private security company as the main body. International organizations as the main body and security service countries as the main body to provide some countermeasures and suggestions. For our government, not only to seek a breakthrough in domestic law, but also to actively absorb the results of international laws and relevant documents. Striving to be in line with international standards; For private security companies, it is necessary not only to strengthen the internal system construction, personnel training and technology development, but also to be in line with their international counterparts, and strive to improve their international competitiveness; For international organizations, efforts should be made to make the Montreux document internationally legally binding; For the host country of security service, it is necessary not only to construct the domestic security legal system, but also to establish the contact mechanism and the conflict management mechanism with the international law and the law of the investor's home country.
【學位授予單位】：浙江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.14

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邢瑞利;劉艷峰;;東南亞安全治理中的私人安保公司[J];國際展望;2015年04期

2 楊楠;;對私人保安業(yè)定義及其功能的思考[J];法制博覽;2015年08期

3 王灝;;當代私營軍事公司興起的原因及影響[J];雞西大學學報;2014年08期

4 裴志林;張志文;;中國民營企業(yè)“走出去”的態(tài)勢與思考[J];北京社會科學;2013年03期

5 趙亞峗;;中國應(yīng)該有自己的“黑水”嗎?[J];社會觀察;2012年04期

6 鄭杰;朱雁新;;反海盜行動中依法使用武力應(yīng)注意的問題[J];西安政治學院學報;2010年06期

7 王宸;王樹文;;我國保安服務(wù)市場化改革拷問——由《保安服務(wù)管理條例》實施引發(fā)的思考[J];北京人民警察學院學報;2010年03期

8 左袖陽;;我國保安服務(wù)立法有關(guān)問題研究——以國內(nèi)外保安服務(wù)立法之比較為視角[J];中南大學學報(社會科學版);2009年05期

9 王秀梅;;《蒙特勒文件》對私營軍事和安保服務(wù)公司的規(guī)制評析[J];西安政治學院學報;2009年05期

10 王秀梅;;雇傭軍、私營軍事公司與非洲[J];理論觀察;2009年04期

，

本文編號：1461692