禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則在刑法中的應(yīng)用研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-01-15 03:10
本文關(guān)鍵詞:禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則在刑法中的應(yīng)用研究 出處:《廣西大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià) 構(gòu)成要件 定罪情節(jié) 量刑情節(jié) 量刑規(guī)范化
【摘要】:禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則根植于法的正義性價(jià)值,在刑法理論研究與司法實(shí)務(wù)中均應(yīng)是一項(xiàng)十分重要的原則,然而我國(guó)刑事立法并沒(méi)有將禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則明確規(guī)定,學(xué)理上關(guān)于禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則的研究漸多但尚淺。禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則既是一項(xiàng)定罪原則又是一項(xiàng)量刑原則,在刑法評(píng)價(jià)全過(guò)程應(yīng)當(dāng)具有應(yīng)用的生命力與前沿性。本文以禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則在定罪與量刑中的不同表現(xiàn)為出發(fā)點(diǎn),通過(guò)禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則對(duì)我國(guó)刑事司法實(shí)務(wù)的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行反思,論述禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則對(duì)定罪和量刑工作指導(dǎo)作用,闡明禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則在我國(guó)刑事司法中應(yīng)當(dāng)具有的地位。本文共分為以下五個(gè)部分:第一部分介紹禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則既是一項(xiàng)定罪原則,也是一項(xiàng)量刑原則,該原則起始于古羅馬法,并經(jīng)英美法系和大陸法系各國(guó)立法中不同的規(guī)定而完善、成熟,蘊(yùn)含著法的正義性、罪刑法定原則與罪刑均衡原則等價(jià)值理論基礎(chǔ)。第二部分介紹禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則在定罪中的貫徹及不足,這一原則能與構(gòu)成要件理論共同解決對(duì)罪數(shù)的理解問(wèn)題,但在一罪內(nèi)部構(gòu)成中,禁止重復(fù)平原則的應(yīng)用不足會(huì)對(duì)情節(jié)犯和數(shù)額犯的認(rèn)知陷入誤區(qū)。第三部分介紹禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則在量刑中的缺失狀況。首先,概括論述對(duì)禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則的不當(dāng)理解造成的量刑環(huán)節(jié)出現(xiàn)指引缺失的問(wèn)題;其次,以禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則評(píng)析司法實(shí)踐中重復(fù)使用量刑情節(jié)的問(wèn)題;最后,通過(guò)刑罰執(zhí)行完畢后對(duì)余罪的處理這一細(xì)節(jié)問(wèn)題,綜合討論量刑中違背禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則的表現(xiàn)和后果,反思我國(guó)目前的量刑思路和制度。第四部分介紹對(duì)禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則在我國(guó)定罪量刑全過(guò)程中具體規(guī)則的設(shè)計(jì)。承接前兩個(gè)部分的論述,明確禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則對(duì)定罪與量刑具體的指導(dǎo)作用,通過(guò)禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則建立定罪與量刑的具體規(guī)則。第五部分介紹與定罪量刑相關(guān)的不可罰的前后行為與外國(guó)刑事判決的承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行,將其納入禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)研究的思考中。
[Abstract]:The principle of prohibiting repeated evaluation is rooted in the justice value of law, which should be a very important principle in the theoretical research of criminal law and judicial practice. However, the principle of prohibiting repeated evaluation is not explicitly stipulated in Chinese criminal legislation. In theory, there are more and more researches on the principle of prohibiting repeated evaluation. The principle of prohibiting repeated evaluation is not only a principle of conviction but also a principle of sentencing. In the whole process of criminal law evaluation should have the vitality and the front-line. This article to prohibit the principle of repeated evaluation in the conviction and sentencing of different performance as the starting point. Through the prohibition of repeated evaluation of the principle of criminal justice practice in China to reflect on the status quo, discusses the prohibition of repeated evaluation of the principle of conviction and sentencing guidance. This article is divided into the following five parts: the first part introduces the prohibition of repeated evaluation principle is not only a conviction principle, but also a sentencing principle. This principle originated from ancient Roman law and was perfected by different provisions in the legislation of Anglo-American law system and civil law system. It is mature and contains the justice of law. The second part introduces the implementation and deficiency of the prohibition of repeated evaluation principle in the conviction. This principle can solve the problem of understanding the number of crimes together with the theory of constitutive elements, but in the internal constitution of a crime. The lack of application of the prohibition of the principle of repetition will fall into a misunderstanding of the circumstances of crime and the amount of crime. The third part introduces the lack of prohibition of repeated evaluation in sentencing. First of all. Discuss the problem of the lack of guidance on sentencing link caused by the improper understanding of the prohibition of repeated evaluation principle; Secondly, to analyze the repeated use of sentencing circumstances in judicial practice with the principle of prohibiting repeated evaluation; Finally, through the punishment after the execution of the residual crime after the handling of this detail, comprehensive discussion of sentencing against the principle of repeated evaluation of the performance and consequences. Part 4th introduces the design of the specific rules of the prohibition of repeated evaluation principle in the whole process of conviction and sentencing in China. Clear prohibition of repeated evaluation of the principle of conviction and sentencing specific guidance role. Through the prohibition of repeated evaluation principle to establish the conviction and sentencing of specific rules. Part 5th introduces the conviction and sentencing related to the non-punishable behavior and the recognition and enforcement of foreign criminal sentences. To put it into the thinking of the research on the prohibition of repeated evaluation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D924.3
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 秦書(shū)生 ,張玉春;高校素質(zhì)教育評(píng)價(jià)原則與方法[J];理論界;2002年05期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 彭琨;禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則在刑法中的應(yīng)用研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2017年
2 張翠翠;禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則的刑法適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)探究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年
3 賀俠;量刑中的禁止重復(fù)評(píng)價(jià)原則研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2015年
,本文編號(hào):1426508
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1426508.html
最近更新
教材專著