本文關(guān)鍵詞：幫助他人自殺非罪化研究　出處：《煙臺(tái)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 幫助 自殺 非罪

【摘要】：幫助自殺是指對(duì)已經(jīng)產(chǎn)生自殺想法的人給予精神或身體上的支持,主要表現(xiàn)為口頭上的鼓勵(lì)、奉勸,身體行為上的幫助表現(xiàn)為為其提供自殺工具。無(wú)論是哪種形式的幫助,都可以達(dá)到讓自殺者更好地實(shí)施自殺行為的目的。這些行為都能夠起到促進(jìn)、推動(dòng)、強(qiáng)化作用,但是幫助行為也有一定的程度限制。它和其他形式的自殺有著明顯的區(qū)別。比如,幫助自殺與教唆自殺、相約自殺、脅迫自殺、欺騙自殺等等,不能混為一談。對(duì)幫助自殺行為進(jìn)行定性要準(zhǔn)確的把握其內(nèi)涵及其特征要求。而關(guān)于如何在刑法上對(duì)幫助自殺行為進(jìn)行準(zhǔn)確的定性,在刑法學(xué)界并沒(méi)有形成一致的觀點(diǎn),有的主張按照故意殺人罪予以定罪處罰,這一觀點(diǎn)是目前刑法學(xué)界的通說(shuō);有的認(rèn)為幫助自殺并不構(gòu)成故意殺人罪,反對(duì)按照故意殺人罪定罪量刑,應(yīng)該予以非罪化處理。理論上雖然存在著這樣的爭(zhēng)議,但是刑事司法實(shí)踐中卻都是將幫助自殺按照故意殺人罪進(jìn)行定罪量刑的。幫助自殺與故意殺人罪存在明顯的差別,而且?guī)椭詺⒑蛶椭缸镆彩遣煌?因?yàn)樽詺⒉皇欠缸�。幫助自殺也不具備典型的犯罪特�?表現(xiàn)在幫助自殺不具有嚴(yán)重的社會(huì)危害性、不具備刑事違法性和罪責(zé)性。幫助自殺非罪化也符合刑法的內(nèi)在要求,表現(xiàn)在幫助自殺符合刑法的目的和刑法的公正。幫助自殺行為不應(yīng)成為刑法關(guān)注的對(duì)象。
[Abstract]:To help commit suicide is to give mental or physical support to a person who has already committed suicide, mainly in the form of verbal encouragement and advice. Physical behavioral help is to provide suicide tools. No matter what kind of help can achieve the purpose of better suicide behavior. These behaviors can play a role in promoting and promoting suicide. Reinforcement, but there are certain limits to helping behavior. It is distinct from other forms of suicide. For example, aiding suicide and abetting suicide, committing suicide in agreement, coercing suicide, deceiving suicide, and so on. Can not be confused. To help commit suicide should accurately grasp its connotation and characteristics of the qualitative requirements. And on how to help suicide in the criminal law of the accurate characterization. There is no consistent view in the field of criminal law, some advocate according to the crime of intentional homicide to be convicted and punished, this view is the common view in the field of criminal law; Some people think that helping suicide does not constitute intentional homicide, against the conviction and sentencing according to intentional homicide, should be decriminalized. Although there is such a dispute in theory. But in the practice of criminal justice, the crime of helping suicide is convicted and sentenced according to the crime of intentional homicide. There are obvious differences between helping suicide and intentional homicide, and helping suicide and helping crime are also different. Because suicide is not a crime, helping suicide does not have typical criminal characteristics, which is manifested in the fact that helping suicide does not have serious social harm. Help suicide decriminalization also conforms to the inherent requirement of criminal law, which is manifested in that helping suicide conforms to the purpose of criminal law and the justice of criminal law. Helping suicide behavior should not become the object of criminal law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 王志遠(yuǎn);于曉光;;參與犯處罰條件的立法論思考——以我國(guó)共犯制度實(shí)踐為視野[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2013年01期

2 王鋼;;自殺的認(rèn)定及其相關(guān)行為的刑法評(píng)價(jià)[J];法學(xué)研究;2012年04期

3 錢移;蘇怡程;;論不作為犯罪的犯罪構(gòu)成[J];成功(教育);2011年16期

4 敦寧;范秀娜;;買安眠藥幫助他人自殺的行為如何定性[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年10期

5 何榮功;;論間接正犯的實(shí)行行為[J];政治與法律;2007年06期

6 馮軍;;刑法中的自我答責(zé)[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2006年03期

7 劉孝敏;;論法益侵害說(shuō)與規(guī)范違反說(shuō)之爭(zhēng)[J];法學(xué)論壇;2006年01期

8 馮軍;刑法的規(guī)范化詮釋[J];法商研究;2005年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李雪松;論自殺參與行為[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1419259