論我國刑辯律師偵查階段的執(zhí)業(yè)困境及權利保障
本文關鍵詞:論我國刑辯律師偵查階段的執(zhí)業(yè)困境及權利保障 出處:《青島大學》2017年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
更多相關文章: 偵查階段 刑辯律師 執(zhí)業(yè)困境 權利保障
【摘要】:作為刑事訴訟的基石,偵查階段在刑事訴訟過程中極為重要。因為偵查階段取得的證據(jù)和掌握的事實將直接影響到未來的審判結果。在偵查階段,最為關鍵的是對犯罪嫌疑人的人權保護。而偵查階段對于犯罪嫌疑人的人權保護程度是可以從刑辯律師介入偵查階段的自由度和權利廣泛與否來體現(xiàn)的。為了強化刑辯律師的地位和作用,我國現(xiàn)行法律法規(guī)賦予了刑辯律師更廣泛的權利。2012年,第11屆全國人大常委會第29次會議通過了《全國人民代表大會常務委員會關于修改〈中華人民共和國律師法〉的決定》。律師法的修改是對律師(尤其是刑辯律師)重要性的一種肯定。但此舉仍然改變不了我國律師的弱勢地位。我國律師制度總體上仍然十分脆弱,律師在訴訟過程中的權利仍有待進一步完善和發(fā)展。如刑辯律師在偵查階段的權利仍然不完整;刑辯律師在執(zhí)業(yè)過程中缺乏相應的保障措施;偵查機關和社會公眾對刑辯律師的認識存在偏差。與此同時,偵查機關權利過大,對其的監(jiān)督機制過少。這很容易使得犯罪嫌疑人的基本權利受到侵犯。即使偵查機關侵犯了犯罪嫌疑人的合法權利,事后救濟措施和補救措施都是有限的。刑辯律師不能夠有效的為犯罪嫌疑人在偵查階段提供法律服務。這使得控辯雙方提供的證據(jù)不對等,影響接下來在庭審程序中的辯護效果,使得審判程序中的控辯對抗淪為一種形式。
[Abstract]:As a cornerstone of criminal procedure, the investigation stage in the process of criminal procedure is very important. Because of the investigation stage to obtain the evidence and facts will directly affect the future of the outcome of the trial. In the investigation stage, the key is the protection of human rights of criminal suspects. And the protection of human rights for criminal suspects in the investigation stage degree can be from the criminal defense lawyers in the investigation stage of the degree of freedom and rights are widely or not to reflect. In order to strengthen the status and role of lawyers, China's current laws and regulations give lawyers more extensive rights in.2012, the eleventh session of the twenty-ninth meeting of the NPC Standing Committee passed the "Standing Committee of the National People's Congress decision. Law on Amending the law." People's Republic of China is modified to the lawyer (especially lawyers) a certain importance. But it still does not change Our country's weak position. Our legal system is still very weak, the rights of lawyers in litigation process still needs further improvement and development. Such as criminal defense lawyers in the investigation stage right is still not complete; the lawyers lack the appropriate security measures in the process of practice; deviation of investigation organs and society public awareness of the criminal defense lawyer. At the same time, the investigation organ right is too large, too little of the supervision mechanism. It is very easy to make the basic rights of criminal suspects have been violated. Even if the investigation organ infringes the legitimate rights of criminal suspects, relief measures and remedial measures are limited. The lawyers can not be effective the suspect in the investigation stage to provide legal services. This makes the evidence provided by both parties are not equal, then affect the defense in the trial procedure in effect, the trial process The conflict of accusation in the order is reduced to a form.
【學位授予單位】:青島大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D925.2;D926.5
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 卞建林;王進喜;陳衛(wèi)東;王新清;;依法保障律師執(zhí)業(yè)權利專家筆談[J];中國司法;2015年10期
2 黃yN;;我國刑辯律師執(zhí)業(yè)環(huán)境的思考[J];時代金融;2015年15期
3 曾粵興;;法治視野下的律師辯護權——兼評高法刑訴法解釋(征求意見稿)第250條[J];時代法學;2013年01期
4 李文芳;何建聰;;辯護律師調(diào)查取證權的法理學分析[J];湖北警官學院學報;2013年01期
5 ;《中華人民共和國刑事訴訟法》修正前后對照表[J];人民檢察;2012年08期
6 李紅琳;;論律師在場權與偵查權的博弈與平衡——寫在《刑事訴訟法修正案》出臺之前[J];法制與社會;2012年11期
7 陳學權;;偵查期間合理限制律師會見權研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2011年05期
8 陳光中;汪海燕;;偵查階段律師辯護問題研究——兼論修訂后的《律師法》實施問題[J];中國法學;2010年01期
9 陳海平;;偵查階段律師幫助:制度價值、國際標準與域外經(jīng)驗[J];安慶師范學院學報(社會科學版);2010年01期
10 王金華;余經(jīng)林;;試論偵查階段的辯護律師閱卷權——以新《律師法》的不足為視角[J];法治研究;2009年04期
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 劉計劃;;律師辯護制度向前再進一大步[N];法制日報;2011年
,本文編號:1415300
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1415300.html