本文關(guān)鍵詞：私轉(zhuǎn)他人支付寶賬戶資金行為定性研究　出處：《安徽財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 支付寶 轉(zhuǎn)移資金 盜竊罪 詐騙罪 處分行為

【摘要】：在司法實(shí)踐中,詐騙罪、信用卡詐騙罪、盜竊罪是極為常見的侵犯財(cái)產(chǎn)類犯罪。犯罪手段的多樣性、新的犯罪形式的出現(xiàn),使得對這幾類犯罪的性質(zhì)有時(shí)難以準(zhǔn)確界定。由于在司法實(shí)踐中司法主體對處分行為定性的把握存在一定差異,導(dǎo)致“同案不同判”的司法亂象,對法律的權(quán)威性和統(tǒng)一性造成不利影響。例如隨著私轉(zhuǎn)他人支付寶賬戶資金案件的日益增多,司法實(shí)踐中對此類行為出現(xiàn)了詐騙罪、信用卡詐騙罪、盜竊罪等不同的司法認(rèn)定,而經(jīng)調(diào)查分析,此種類型犯罪中有許多案件存在極大的相似性,司法判決的結(jié)果不統(tǒng)一,恐會制約司法作用的發(fā)揮。為此,筆者通過對私轉(zhuǎn)他人支付寶賬戶資金行為的一些典型案例的分析研究,并參考大量文獻(xiàn),歸納總結(jié)出此類案件三種形式,這三種形式在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中具有多發(fā)性,是這類案件的典型代表。就這三種私轉(zhuǎn)他人支付寶賬戶資金行為應(yīng)當(dāng)如何定性深入探究,否定了行為人構(gòu)成詐騙罪和信用卡詐騙罪,得出了應(yīng)當(dāng)定性為盜竊罪的結(jié)論。首先,本文確定私轉(zhuǎn)他人支付寶賬戶資金行為相關(guān)概念的內(nèi)涵,通過對支付寶法律定位進(jìn)行分析,對“私轉(zhuǎn)”行為進(jìn)行界定,明確研究對象及范圍。其次,對私轉(zhuǎn)他人支付寶賬戶資金行為的裁判案例進(jìn)行歸納總結(jié),分析不同的判決結(jié)果及理由,并對每一種判決結(jié)果進(jìn)行評析,找出所爭議的焦點(diǎn)問題:對支付寶處分行為的認(rèn)定。最后,重點(diǎn)對私轉(zhuǎn)他人支付寶賬戶資金行為的焦點(diǎn)問題即支付寶是否具有處分行為進(jìn)行分析,并對與之認(rèn)定相關(guān)的因素逐一考量,在借鑒國內(nèi)外相關(guān)學(xué)者對處分行為的理論基礎(chǔ)上,提出自己的見解,以期能夠?yàn)樗睫D(zhuǎn)他人支付寶賬戶資金行為的定性提供一定的參考。在研究方法上,采用橫向比較和縱向分析相結(jié)合的方法,集中列舉諸多案例,橫向比較案例各種處理方式的利弊,尋找問題的本質(zhì)所在。處分行為的認(rèn)定問題是研究對象的本質(zhì),是定性研究對象的關(guān)鍵所在。通過對處分行為各個(gè)要素的縱向分析,為處分行為的認(rèn)定提供了有力的理論支持,進(jìn)而解決了私轉(zhuǎn)他人支付寶資金行為的定性問題。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, fraud, credit card fraud, theft is a very common crime against property, the diversity of criminal means, the emergence of new forms of crime. The nature of these crimes is sometimes difficult to define accurately. Due to the judicial subject in judicial practice, there are certain differences in the nature of disposition, leading to the judicial confusion of "different judgments in the same case". For example, with the increasing number of cases of private transfer of other people's Alipay account funds, there are fraud and credit card fraud in judicial practice. Larceny and other different judicial cognizance, but through investigation and analysis, there are many cases in this type of crime, there are great similarities, the result of judicial decision is not uniform, which may restrict the exertion of judicial function. The author through the private transfer of other people Alipay account fund behavior of some typical cases of analysis and research, and reference to a large number of literature, summed up this kind of cases three forms, these three forms of real life with multiple. It is a typical representative of this kind of cases. On the three kinds of private transfer of other people's Alipay account funds behavior should be qualitative and in-depth exploration, denying the perpetrator of the crime of fraud and credit card fraud. First of all, this paper determines the connotation of the concept of private transfer of other people's Alipay account funds behavior, through the analysis of the legal positioning of Alipay, the "private transfer" behavior is defined. Clear research object and scope. Secondly, the private transfer of other people Alipay account fund behavior of the judgment cases are summarized, analysis of different decisions and reasons, and each kind of judgment results are evaluated. To find out the focus of the dispute: to determine the behavior of Alipay disposition. Finally, focus on the private transfer of other people Alipay account fund behavior focus problem, that is, whether Alipay has a disciplinary action to analyze. And with the identification of the relevant factors one by one to consider, in reference to domestic and foreign scholars on the theoretical basis of disciplinary action, put forward their own views. In order to provide a certain reference for the qualitative analysis of the private transfer of other people's Alipay account capital behavior. In the research method, the combination of horizontal comparison and vertical analysis method, concentrated enumeration of many cases. Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of various ways of dealing with cases horizontally to find the essence of the problem. The problem of the identification of disciplinary action is the essence of the object of study. It is the key of the qualitative research object. Through the longitudinal analysis of the various elements of the disposition behavior, it provides a strong theoretical support for the identification of the disposition behavior. And then solve the qualitative problem of private transfer of other people's Alipay fund behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓卓然;;“支付寶”運(yùn)營模式下的相關(guān)法律問題探究[J];法制與社會;2011年29期

2 ;把閑錢放在“支付寶”里更劃算[J];中國工會財(cái)會;2014年02期

3 任蕙蘭;;支付寶的金融野心[J];新民周刊;2013年25期

4 陸建國;;支付寶的恐懼和機(jī)遇[J];法人雜志;2009年06期

5 孫書林;;支付寶詐騙模式及其防范策略[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

6 甘曉晨;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)自治規(guī)則研究——以支付寶規(guī)則為例[J];法律和社會科學(xué);2010年01期

7 ;警方提醒:支付寶詐騙又出新“變種”[J];中國防偽報(bào)道;2014年03期

8 張興華;;從“支付寶”談網(wǎng)上第三方支付平臺的法律問題[J];職業(yè)時(shí)空;2008年02期

9 沈利軍;徐偉;;支付寶虛擬賬戶支付的法律分析及規(guī)制[J];金融與經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年06期

10 沈利軍;徐偉;;支付寶虛擬賬戶支付的法律分析及規(guī)制[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 ;支付及金融衍生類電子商務(wù)企業(yè)的發(fā)展創(chuàng)新[A];中國電子商務(wù)企業(yè)發(fā)展報(bào)告2013[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 郝楠;從支付寶看網(wǎng)上購物信用體系[N];中國企業(yè)報(bào);2007年

2 楊國強(qiáng);先于阿里巴巴支付寶臺灣探路[N];第一財(cái)經(jīng)日報(bào);2007年

3 ;支付寶為網(wǎng)店銷售帶來了什么？[N];電腦商報(bào);2008年

4 戴遠(yuǎn)程;支付寶用戶數(shù)突破1億[N];南方日報(bào);2008年

5 徐曉巍;支付寶承諾購物受騙全額賠償[N];中國證券報(bào);2008年

6 南方日報(bào)記者 戴遠(yuǎn)程;支付寶牽手聯(lián)通加速“生活化”[N];南方日報(bào);2009年

7 魏晨;126家境外商戶簽約支付寶[N];國際商報(bào);2010年

8 本報(bào)記者 周婷;支付寶啟動手機(jī)安全支付[N];中國證券報(bào);2010年

9 正望咨詢副總裁 周洪美;支付寶價(jià)值幾何？[N];北京商報(bào);2011年

10 記者 程婕;捷星航空與支付寶達(dá)成戰(zhàn)略合作協(xié)議[N];中國民航報(bào);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 曾U，

本文編號：1410821