本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國指導(dǎo)性案例的司法適用研究　出處：《煙臺大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 指導(dǎo)性案例 司法價值 同案同判 文本剪輯 審判改革

【摘要】：指導(dǎo)性案例制度的相關(guān)研究一直為學(xué)術(shù)界廣為關(guān)注,學(xué)者集中對指導(dǎo)性案例的規(guī)范效力;個案性指導(dǎo)性案例的缺陷;指導(dǎo)性案例司法適用等相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行研究和探討。隨著制度日益成熟學(xué)者對其亦尤為看重,期望指導(dǎo)性案例在中國司法實踐中發(fā)揮應(yīng)有之效。不過現(xiàn)行指導(dǎo)性案例本身卻不如人意,在很多方面存在漏洞,比如:判斷案件是否相似需要確定案件的比較點;法官對案例不適感很強;案例文本剪輯力求簡約卻同原始文本發(fā)生矛盾;待決案件同現(xiàn)行指導(dǎo)性案例融洽對接太難;部門法意義上指導(dǎo)性案例尤其是已頒行刑事指導(dǎo)性案例與學(xué)者期待相去甚遠(yuǎn);刑事案例指導(dǎo)制度具有使規(guī)范明確化、統(tǒng)一法律適用等功能。但有的案例在重申公共議題,有的案例與司法解釋重復(fù)。而強力推進(jìn)刑事案例指導(dǎo)制度可能與罪刑法定相抵觸;商事指導(dǎo)性案例與實際生活脫節(jié)嚴(yán)重;指導(dǎo)性案例適用邏輯混亂;指導(dǎo)性案例作為斷案依據(jù)不足。針對上述問題,筆者結(jié)合司法實務(wù)具體案件并采取兼評兼議之策略,力圖讓相關(guān)論證富有層次感和邏輯性。在指導(dǎo)性案例的司法適用上,筆者首先對國內(nèi)外指導(dǎo)性案例相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行概括論證;再對制度的司法價值作出評析;在上述理論基礎(chǔ)上分門別類對我國現(xiàn)行指導(dǎo)性案例按照部門法類別進(jìn)行比較分析;案件的比較點或相關(guān)的類似性事項可以延展。類比保證規(guī)則和類比保證理由可以幫助、規(guī)范類似性判斷,并在一定程度上防止類似性判斷的專斷和失誤。從類比保證理由的角度改進(jìn)未來裁判理由的撰寫,可以使裁判理由與裁判要點的聯(lián)系更加緊密,有利于指導(dǎo)性案例的使用和案例指導(dǎo)制度的發(fā)展。最高人民法院不應(yīng)是唯一的壟斷力量,建立詳盡的案例指導(dǎo)制度配套措施,增設(shè)“大法官會議”制度,承認(rèn)地方法院經(jīng)常參酌案例的指導(dǎo)性地位,肯定基層法官、專家學(xué)者、律師對于刑事案例指導(dǎo)建設(shè)的獨特貢獻(xiàn)。文章重點落腳到制度缺陷解決與完善上,主要從制度規(guī)范效力、適用邏輯、文本剪輯以及審級制度等多角度提出創(chuàng)新建議,希望對現(xiàn)行制度改革有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The related research of the guiding case system has been widely concerned by the academic circles, and scholars focus on the normative effect of the guiding case. The defects of case guidance cases; Guiding cases of judicial application and other related issues are studied and discussed. As the system becomes more and more mature scholars also attach great importance to it. It is expected that the instructive case will play its due role in the judicial practice of China. However, the present instructive case itself is not satisfactory, and there are many loopholes in many aspects. For example, it is necessary to determine the comparative point of the case to judge whether the case is similar or not; The judge is very uncomfortable to the case; The case text editing tries to be simple but contradictory with the original text; It is too difficult for the pending cases to connect harmoniously with the current instructive cases; In the sense of department law, instructive cases, especially those that have been issued, are far from the expectation of scholars. The guidance system of criminal cases has the functions of making the norms clear and unifying the application of the law. However, some cases reiterate the public issues. Some cases are duplicated with judicial interpretation, and the strong promotion of the guidance system of criminal cases may conflict with the legality of the crime; The commercial guidance case is out of touch with the actual life seriously; The application logic of instructive cases is confused; Guiding cases as the basis for adjudication is inadequate. In view of the above problems, the author combines the specific cases of judicial practice and adopts the strategy of both evaluation and discussion. In the judicial application of instructive cases, the author firstly generalizes the relevant theories of instructive cases at home and abroad. Secondly, it evaluates the judicial value of the system; On the basis of the above theories, the author makes a comparative analysis of the current instructive cases in China according to the category of branch law. The comparative point of the case or the related similar matter can be extended. The analogical guarantee rule and the analogous guarantee reason can help to regulate the analogous judgment. And to a certain extent to prevent the arbitrariness of similar judgments and mistakes. From the perspective of analogous assurance reasons to improve the writing of the future referee reasons can make the referee reasons and the referee points more closely linked. The Supreme people's Court should not be the only monopoly force, establish detailed case guidance system supporting measures, and add the "Justices' Conference" system. Recognize the local courts often refer to the guiding status of cases, affirm the grass-roots judges, experts and scholars, lawyers for the unique contribution to the construction of criminal cases. The article focuses on the system defects to solve and improve. This paper puts forward some innovative suggestions from the aspects of system normative effect, applicable logic, text editing and review system, hoping to be beneficial to the reform of the current system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 泮偉江;;論指導(dǎo)性案例的效力[J];清華法學(xué);2016年01期

2 雷磊;;指導(dǎo)性案例法源地位再反思[J];中國法學(xué);2015年01期

3 黃澤敏;張繼成;;指導(dǎo)性案例援引方式之規(guī)范研究——以將裁判要點作為排他性判決理由為核心[J];法商研究;2014年04期

4 張騏;;論類似案件的判斷[J];中外法學(xué);2014年02期

5 陳興良;;新型受賄罪的司法認(rèn)定:以刑事指導(dǎo)案例(潘玉梅、陳寧受賄案)為視角[J];南京師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年01期

6 劉忠;;規(guī)模與內(nèi)部治理——中國法院編制變遷三十年(1978—2008)[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2012年05期

7 孫國祥;;從柔性參考到剛性參照的嬗變——以“兩高”指導(dǎo)性案例拘束力的規(guī)定為視角[J];南京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué).人文科學(xué).社會科學(xué)版);2012年03期

8 陳興良;;案例指導(dǎo)制度的法理考察[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2012年03期

9 黃京平;;刑事指導(dǎo)性案例中的公共議題芻議[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年01期

10 舒洪水;;建立我國案例指導(dǎo)制度的困境和出路——以刑事案例為例[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 陳興良;;從規(guī)則體系視角考察中國案例指導(dǎo)制度[N];檢察日報;2012年

，

本文編號：1403430