本文關(guān)鍵詞：中國(guó)基層協(xié)商民主程序化建設(shè)研究　出處：《山東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 協(xié)商民主 基層 程序化 現(xiàn)狀 路徑

【摘要】：任何一種民主形式都是實(shí)質(zhì)民主和程序民主的辯證復(fù)合體。民主的程序化是當(dāng)代民主政治的重要原則。基層協(xié)商民主作為我國(guó)社會(huì)主義民主政治系統(tǒng)中重要的組成部分,是基層群眾參與民主政治的民主形式,也離不開(kāi)實(shí)體的價(jià)值指向和程序硬性操作�；鶎訁f(xié)商民主看重并尊重程序,并認(rèn)為程序是基層協(xié)商決策獲得穩(wěn)定性和權(quán)威性的必不可少的硬性要求。程序化是基層協(xié)商民主有效運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)的必然要求,基層協(xié)商民主程序化建設(shè)有利于實(shí)現(xiàn)協(xié)商決策的穩(wěn)定性與權(quán)威性,實(shí)現(xiàn)公眾真實(shí)有序參與,保證多元社會(huì)和諧共存,提升基層協(xié)商民主的系統(tǒng)效能�；鶎訁f(xié)商民主程序,是由主體要素、制度要素、機(jī)制要素構(gòu)成的統(tǒng)一體,環(huán)環(huán)相扣,層層遞進(jìn)。根據(jù)基層協(xié)商民主程序化中要素構(gòu)成比例以及各要素所起的作用的差異,將基層協(xié)商民主的生長(zhǎng)路徑分為內(nèi)生性、外生性和融合性基層協(xié)商民主程序化三大類�；鶎訁f(xié)商民主程序化是根植于基層協(xié)商主體民主自覺(jué)性不斷提升、基層協(xié)商民主制度不斷健全、基層協(xié)商民主平臺(tái)不斷完善等深厚的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)發(fā)展起來(lái)的。但同時(shí)也應(yīng)該認(rèn)識(shí)到基層協(xié)商民主才剛剛開(kāi)始起步,在基層協(xié)商民主組織程序、開(kāi)展程序、落實(shí)程序等方面普遍存在著共同的問(wèn)題,具體表現(xiàn)為基層協(xié)商議題與協(xié)商主體的確定程序不合理、個(gè)體行動(dòng)能力的不平等與社會(huì)的不平等制約了影響協(xié)商開(kāi)展程序的公正性、落實(shí)停滯與落實(shí)走樣降低了協(xié)商的實(shí)效。深入探討其存在問(wèn)題的原因主要是在于基層管理者在基層協(xié)商民主程序化上供給能力的不足、基層協(xié)商民主程序化的法制建設(shè)的落后、歷史和文化對(duì)個(gè)體政治參與行為的禁錮�？傮w來(lái)看,基層協(xié)商民主程序化建設(shè)涉及面廣,要想實(shí)現(xiàn)協(xié)商民主理念與基層民主治理的無(wú)縫對(duì)接,更好地發(fā)揮程序化建設(shè)對(duì)基層協(xié)商民主的實(shí)效,還有很多方面需要加以改進(jìn)和完善。一是要明確基層協(xié)商民主程序化主體的角色定位,明確各級(jí)政府在基層協(xié)商民主程序化中的主導(dǎo)作用,基層干部在基層協(xié)商民主程序化中的組織作用,基層群眾在基層協(xié)商民主程序化中的核心作用,社會(huì)組織在基層協(xié)商民主獨(dú)特作用。二是要完善基層協(xié)商民主程序化機(jī)制建設(shè),在原有的程序設(shè)計(jì)上引入更加合理、全面的代表生成機(jī)制、網(wǎng)絡(luò)參與機(jī)制和監(jiān)督機(jī)制,合理嫁接現(xiàn)有基層協(xié)商民主框架,遏制各種不平等因素對(duì)基層協(xié)商民主的影響。三是要加強(qiáng)基層協(xié)商民主程序化的制度建設(shè),加強(qiáng)基層協(xié)商民主程序化的制度合理性,發(fā)揮制度宏觀的規(guī)定作用,加強(qiáng)基層協(xié)商民主程序化的制度權(quán)威性,發(fā)揮制度微觀的規(guī)范作用�；鶎訁f(xié)商民主程序化是協(xié)調(diào)多方面因素動(dòng)態(tài)化的發(fā)展過(guò)程,要深刻融入到基層治理中去,才能在實(shí)踐中不斷得以發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Any form of democracy is a dialectical complex of substantive democracy and procedural democracy. The procedure of democracy is an important principle of contemporary democratic politics. Deliberative democracy at the grassroots level, as an important part of China's socialist democratic political system, is a democratic form of grassroots participation in democratic politics, and also cannot be separated from the value orientation of the entity and the rigid operation of procedure. The grass-roots consultative democracy emphasizes and respects the procedure, and considers that the procedure is a necessary hard demand for the stability and authority of the grass-roots consultative decision. Procedure is the inevitable requirement of effective operation of grassroots consultative democracy. The construction of grassroots deliberative democracy is conducive to the realization of stability and authority of negotiation decision-making, achieving the true and orderly participation of the public, ensuring the harmonious coexistence of multiple societies, and improving the system efficiency of grassroots consultative democracy. The democratic process at the grass-roots level is a unified body composed of the main elements, the institutional elements and the mechanism elements. According to the proportion of constituent elements in the process of deliberative democracy in grass-roots units and the difference between the functions of each element, the growth path of grassroots consultative democracy can be divided into three categories: endogenous, exogenous and inclusive. The process of deliberative democracy at the grassroots level is rooted in the deep realistic foundation of grass-roots consultative body, the continuous improvement of democratic consciousness, the continuous improvement of grass-roots consultative democracy system and the continuous improvement of grass-roots consultative democracy platform. But at the same time should also recognize that grassroots deliberative democracy has just started, the deliberative democracy at the grass-roots level organizational procedures, carry out procedures, implementation procedures and other aspects exist common problems, specific performance issues and grassroots deliberative consultation body determination procedures is not reasonable, individual action ability of inequality and social inequality constraints influence to carry out the negotiation of procedural fairness, the implementation of stagnation and reduces the effectiveness of negotiation to implement aliasing. The main reason for its problems lies mainly in the inadequate supply ability of grassroots managers at the grassroots level in deliberative democracy, the backward construction of the legal system at the grassroots level, the imposition of historical and cultural constraints on individual political participation. Generally speaking, the process of grassroots deliberative democracy construction involves a wide range. If we want to achieve seamless docking between deliberative democracy and grassroots democratic governance, we need to further improve and improve the effectiveness of procedural construction for grassroots consultative democracy. One is to define the subject role of grassroots deliberative democracy programs, clear all levels of government at the grassroots democratic consultation procedures in the leading role, the role of grassroots cadres in grassroots deliberative democracy program in the core of the grassroots deliberative democracy at the grassroots level in the program for grassroots social organizations in the unique role of deliberative democracy. The two is to improve the construction of the mechanism of deliberative democracy at the grassroots level in the original program, the program introduced a more reasonable and comprehensive representative formation mechanism, network participation mechanism and supervision mechanism, reasonable grafting existing grassroots deliberative democracy framework, contain the effects of various unequal factors of grassroots democratic consultation. Three, we must strengthen the system construction of deliberative democracy at the grassroots level, strengthen the institutional rationality of the deliberative democracy program at the grassroots level, give full play to the macro regulatory role of the system, strengthen the institutional authority of the deliberative democracy program at the grass-roots level, and play the micro regulatory role of the system. The process of deliberative democracy at the grass-roots level is the development process of coordinating various factors' dynamic development, and must be deeply integrated into grass-roots governance, so that we can continue to develop in practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D621

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 ;Operable Democracy[J];Beijing Review;2012年23期

2 陽(yáng)煜琳;丁漩;;“Deliberative Democracy”的創(chuàng)新解析[J];科技創(chuàng)新導(dǎo)報(bào);2009年31期

3 李;;協(xié)商民主不能解決所有問(wèn)題[J];當(dāng)代社科視野;2012年05期

4 HUOSHENG TAN;;Deliberative Democracy in China: A Sociology of Knowledge Perspective[J];Economic and Political Studies;2013年01期

5 顏旭;;試論中英文語(yǔ)境中的“協(xié)商”概念——兼議Deliberative Democracy一詞的中文譯名[J];四川省社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

6 韓冬梅;;西方協(xié)商民主的概念與特征解析[J];中國(guó)政協(xié)理論研究;2009年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 Joseph Fewsmith;;人民內(nèi)部矛盾的解決:協(xié)商民主有用嗎?(英文)[A];北京論壇（2011）文明的和諧與共同繁榮--傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代、變革與轉(zhuǎn)型：“協(xié)商民主與社會(huì)和諧”政治分論壇論文及摘要集[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 胡潤(rùn)忠;畢塞特的協(xié)商民主概念解析[N];學(xué)習(xí)時(shí)報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 Miriam Tardell;[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2014年

2 柏劍波;中國(guó)特色協(xié)商民主體系多層構(gòu)建研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2016年

3 鞠俊俊;村莊協(xié)商民主的運(yùn)行機(jī)制研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2016年

4 薛穎;中國(guó)基層協(xié)商民主程序化建設(shè)研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2017年

5 趙翊君;協(xié)商實(shí)踐與精神的價(jià)值[D];北京外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1346036