本文關(guān)鍵詞：國內(nèi)保理合同司法實踐問題研究　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 保理 保理合同 管轄

【摘要】：保理,即保付代理,指保理商買下他人的債權(quán),負(fù)責(zé)收回債款從而獲得盈利的行為。保理對企業(yè)應(yīng)收賬款債權(quán)加以合理利用,將應(yīng)收賬款債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橘Y金,成為了獲得融資的利器。當(dāng)前,我國已發(fā)展成為世界上最大的保理市場,在國家提出要大力發(fā)展應(yīng)收賬款融資的利好政策的推動下,保理行業(yè)將迎來重要的發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略機(jī)遇期。在看到保理發(fā)展前景的同時,也應(yīng)該看到保理在我國發(fā)展較晚,因此存在規(guī)范保理合同的法律依據(jù)空缺,對保理合同性質(zhì)認(rèn)識不清,保理商風(fēng)險防范意識和能力較低等問題,使得實踐中產(chǎn)生大量保理合同法律糾紛。保理合同糾紛案件類型新穎,法律關(guān)系復(fù)雜,因此司法實踐中對此類糾紛的處理產(chǎn)生了較多分歧和爭議。分析我國當(dāng)前有關(guān)保理合同的司法實踐,發(fā)現(xiàn)保理合同司法實踐中存在諸多問題,案由不定、管轄不清、當(dāng)事人訴訟地位不明、虛假交易、債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓規(guī)則不明確等,本文重點(diǎn)選取了司法實踐中存在爭議的三個基礎(chǔ)問題進(jìn)行研究,即案由問題、當(dāng)事人訴訟地位問題和管轄問題。研究保理合同司法實踐問題,首先需要了解保理以及保理合同。本文第一部分通過介紹保理的定義、發(fā)展、國內(nèi)保理的定義和分類引出了保理合同法律關(guān)系,得出結(jié)論即保理的法律本質(zhì)就是保理合同,在此基礎(chǔ)上分析了保理合同法律關(guān)系的特征、構(gòu)成要件、保理合同各方當(dāng)事人權(quán)利和義務(wù)關(guān)系;其次,研究國內(nèi)保理合同司法實踐問題還需要了解國內(nèi)保理合同司法實踐現(xiàn)狀,本文第二部分主要是保理合同的司法實踐現(xiàn)狀,從兩個典型案例的分析對比再到對所收集案例整體進(jìn)行數(shù)量、案由、當(dāng)事人、管轄、法律適用等幾個維度的分析,從不同層次了解保理合同司法實踐現(xiàn)狀;再次,研究保理合同同樣需要分析司法實踐中出現(xiàn)的問題,第三部分是論文核心部分,分別對案由問題、當(dāng)事人訴訟地位問題、管轄問題這三個司法實踐中的爭議問題進(jìn)行分析;最后,研究保理合同司法實踐問題是為了解決問題,本文最后一部分主要針對我國國內(nèi)保理的發(fā)展以及保理合同在司法實踐中混亂的現(xiàn)狀,提出了一般化的對策。本文研究的價值在于進(jìn)一步加深了對保理合同法律關(guān)系的認(rèn)識,分析了司法實踐中保理合同的爭議問題,為規(guī)范保理合同司法審判實務(wù)提供可借鑒的意見,并且為今后制定規(guī)范保理合同法律關(guān)系的法律規(guī)范奠定基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:Namely, factoring, factoring, factoring refers to buy other creditor's rights, responsible to recover the debt to obtain profit behavior. Factoring makes rational use of the debt receivable debt of the enterprise, transforming the accounts receivable into funds and becoming a tool for obtaining financing. At present, China has developed into the largest factoring market in the world. Under the impetus of the state's policy of vigorously developing accounts receivable financing, factoring industry will have an important strategic opportunity for development. After seeing the development prospects of factoring factoring at the same time, should also see late in China, so there is the legal basis for the specification of factoring contract for factoring vacancies, clear understanding of the nature of the contract, factoring business risk prevention awareness and ability low, which produces a large number of factoring contract legal disputes in practice. The types of disputes in the factoring contract are novel and the legal relationship is complex, so there are many differences and disputes in the handling of such disputes in the judicial practice. Analysis of China's current judicial practice about the factoring contract, there are many problems of factoring contract in judicial practice, the indefinite, the jurisdiction is not clear, the litigation status unknown, false trading, debt transfer rules are not clear, this article focuses on the three basic problems in the judicial practice in the dispute of the cause of action the problem, litigation status and jurisdiction. To study the judicial practice of factoring contract, it is necessary to understand factoring and factoring contract. The first part of this paper introduces the definition and classification of the definition, development, domestic factoring factoring leads to the factoring contract legal relationship, draw the conclusion that the legal nature of factoring is the factoring contract, based on the analysis of the characteristics, the factoring contract legal relationship of the constituent elements, the parties of factoring contract rights and obligations of the parties; secondly, the research of domestic factoring the contract also need to understand the problem of judicial practice of domestic factoring contract judicial practice, the second part is the present situation of judicial practice of factoring contract, from the comparative analysis of two typical cases to analyze the quantity, cause of action, the parties, jurisdiction, applicable law and several other dimensions of the collected cases overall, understand the present situation of judicial practice of factoring contract from different levels; thirdly, study the factoring contract also needs the analysis of the problems in judicial practice, the third part Is the core part of the thesis, which are analyzed by the dispute case jurisdiction, litigant status, these three problems in the judicial practice; finally, the research of factoring contract judicial practice problem is to solve the problem, the status quo in the judicial practice of chaos in the last part of this article mainly aims at our country in the development of factoring and factoring the contract, put forward the countermeasure of. The value of this research is to further deepen the understanding of the legal relationship of factoring contract, analyzes the controversial issues in the judicial practice of factoring contract, to provide reference for the specification of factoring contract judicial practice, and lay a solid foundation for the future development of the legal norms of factoring contract legal relationship.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫超;應(yīng)收賬款融資的法律問題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 程倩;我國保理法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

2 沈嘉寧;國內(nèi)保理業(yè)發(fā)展必須之法律框架探析[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

3 鄭洪志;論我國保理商開展國際保理的法律風(fēng)險與防范[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1342021