經(jīng)皮Yurt-bone縫合與開放微創(chuàng)手術(shù)治療急性跟腱斷裂的比較研究
本文選題:跟腱斷裂 + 力學生物學; 參考:《新疆醫(yī)科大學》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:目的:比較經(jīng)皮Yurt-bone縫合與開放微創(chuàng)手術(shù)治療急性閉合性跟腱斷裂的臨床療效。方法:回顧性分析2011年9月至2015年12月間我科收治的31例急性閉合性跟腱斷裂患者,根據(jù)手術(shù)方法不同分為經(jīng)皮組(經(jīng)皮Yurt-bone縫合技術(shù)治療,14例)和開放微創(chuàng)組(開放微創(chuàng)手術(shù)治療,17例)。比較兩組患者住院時間、術(shù)中出血量、手術(shù)時間、切口延期愈合率、腓腸神經(jīng)損傷率、小腿最大周徑減少值、單足提踵試驗陽性率、再次斷裂率及末次隨訪時的ATRS功能評分,附加分析彩色超聲多普勒、CT三維重建等影像學檢查結(jié)果。結(jié)果:所有患者術(shù)后獲得平均17.6個月(9~27個月)的隨訪。經(jīng)皮組的住院時間、術(shù)中出血量及手術(shù)時間分別為[(4.2±0.8)d、(8.5±3.6)mL、(41.4±5.3)min],均少于開放微創(chuàng)組的[(5.8±1.3)d、(43.5±7.6)mL、(75.5±7.8)min]差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。經(jīng)皮組和開放微創(chuàng)組患者小腿最大周徑減少值分別為(1.9±0.2)cm和(2.0±0.2)cm,切口延期愈合率分別為0和11.8%,單足提踵試驗陽性率分別為7.1%和5.9%,腓腸神經(jīng)損傷率分別為7.1%和0,ATRS評分分別為(91.2±3.7)分和(90.4±3.3)分,以上指標兩組間比較無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。兩組所有患者未發(fā)生跟腱再斷裂。結(jié)論:經(jīng)皮Yurt-bone重建方法與微創(chuàng)手術(shù)相比具有住院時間短、手術(shù)時間短、術(shù)中出血量少等優(yōu)勢,未增加相關(guān)并發(fā)癥,可早期功能鍛煉,適合臨床推廣。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous Yurt-bone suture and open minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of acute closed Achilles tendon rupture. Methods: from September 2011 to December 2015, 31 patients with acute closed rupture of Achilles tendon were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into percutaneous group (14 cases treated by percutaneous Yurt-bone suture) and open minimally invasive group (17 cases treated with open minimally invasive surgery). The duration of hospitalization, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, delayed healing rate of incision, injury rate of sural nerve, maximum circumference of calf, positive rate of one-foot heel test, rerupture rate and ATRS function score at the last follow-up were compared between the two groups. The results of three-dimensional CT reconstruction with color Doppler ultrasound were also analyzed. Results: all patients were followed up for an average of 17.6 months (9 ~ 27 months). The hospitalization time, intraoperative bleeding volume and operative time in the percutaneous group were (4.2 鹵0.8d) and 8.5 鹵3.6m / L (41.4 鹵5.3)min), respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the open minimally invasive group (43.5 鹵7.6mL, 75.5 鹵7.8)min). In the percutaneous group and open minimally invasive group, the maximum circumference reduction of the leg was 1.9 鹵0.2)cm and 2.0 鹵0.2 cm, respectively, the delayed healing rate of incision was 0 and 11.8, the positive rate of one-foot heel test was 7.1% and 5.9%, and the injury rate of sural nerve was 7.1% and 0% respectively. The scores were 91.2 鹵3.7 and 90.4 鹵3.3, respectively. There was no significant difference between the above two groups (P 0.05). No rupture of Achilles tendon occurred in all patients in both groups. Conclusion: compared with minimally invasive surgery, percutaneous Yurt-bone reconstruction has advantages of shorter hospitalization time, shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, no increase of related complications, and early functional exercise, which is suitable for clinical application.
【學位授予單位】:新疆醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:R687.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 于延飛;劉利;;開放性跟腱斷裂修復術(shù)后運動療法康復與自然恢復療效研究[J];中國農(nóng)村衛(wèi)生事業(yè)管理;2014年08期
2 梁曉軍;趙宏謀;李毅;鹿軍;潘文杰;王琳;;微創(chuàng)手術(shù)與傳統(tǒng)手術(shù)治療急性跟腱斷裂的比較研究[J];中國骨與關(guān)節(jié)外科;2013年05期
3 Jiasharete Jielile;Minawa Aibai;Gulnur Sabirhazi;Nuerai Shawutali;Wulanbai Tangkejie;Aynaz Badelhan;Yeermike Nuerduola;Turde Satewalede;Darehan Buranbai;Beicen Hunapia;Ayidaer Jialihasi;Jingping Bai;Murat Kizaibek;;Active Achilles tendon kinesitherapy accelerates Achilles tendon repair by promoting neurite regeneration[J];Neural Regeneration Research;2012年35期
4 高迪;賈斌;張勇;高彥軍;鄭杰;劉彥勛;馬雪峰;;帶孔鋼針微創(chuàng)Bunnell縫合治療新鮮閉合性跟腱斷裂[J];中國矯形外科雜志;2012年18期
5 加莎熱特·杰力勒;白靖平;;跟腱愈合過程中的力學生物學[J];中國組織工程研究與臨床康復;2008年42期
6 孫淑紅;孫臣友;唐茂林;;跟腱周圍軟組織血供與跟腱斷裂修補術(shù)入路選擇的解剖學研究[J];中國骨傷;2007年02期
7 張發(fā)惠,謝其揚,鄭和平,林松慶,宋一平,田萬成,黃漢偉;腓腸神經(jīng)-小隱靜脈營養(yǎng)血管遠端蒂皮瓣動脈穿支的應(yīng)用解剖[J];中國修復重建外科雜志;2005年07期
8 艾進偉,黃昌林,呂榮,王軍;強化訓練對豚鼠跟腱膠原及蛋白多糖的影響[J];中醫(yī)正骨;2005年04期
9 張長杰,吳宗耀;運動對制動后外側(cè)副韌帶生物力學特性的影響[J];中國運動醫(yī)學雜志;2001年02期
10 徐向陽;劉津浩;朱淵;王碧菠;;筋膜反轉(zhuǎn)法和直接吻合法修復急性跟腱斷裂的比較研究[J];中華創(chuàng)傷骨科雜志;2010年08期
,本文編號:1983359
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/mpalunwen/1983359.html