本文關(guān)鍵詞： 初治肺結(jié)核 薈萃分析 中西醫(yī)結(jié)合　出處：《浙江中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目的評(píng)價(jià)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療初治肺結(jié)核的療效方法以"初治肺結(jié)核"、"中醫(yī)"、"中西醫(yī)"、"湯"、"方"為檢索詞,計(jì)算機(jī)檢索相關(guān)期刊論文(CNKI)、萬(wàn)方數(shù)據(jù)知識(shí)平臺(tái)、中文科技期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)-維普資訊、PubMed中有關(guān)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療初治肺結(jié)核的文獻(xiàn),依據(jù)Cochrane評(píng)價(jià)手冊(cè)評(píng)價(jià)文獻(xiàn)質(zhì)量,并提交數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行薈萃分析,利用RevMan5.3統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件進(jìn)行薈萃分析,分類變量計(jì)算比值比(OR)以及95%可信區(qū)間(CI)。結(jié)果共檢出相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)974篇,含論文題目、作者姓名、出處以及摘要,查重排除文獻(xiàn)剩余文獻(xiàn)325篇,閱讀題目及摘要排除不相關(guān)文獻(xiàn),剩余文獻(xiàn)40篇,進(jìn)一步閱讀全文后,剔除數(shù)據(jù)不完整、觀察指標(biāo)不同及非隨機(jī)對(duì)照(RCT)的文獻(xiàn),最后有16篇文獻(xiàn)3100例患者納入分析,其中中西醫(yī)結(jié)合組1589例,單純西醫(yī)治療組1521例,兩組基線數(shù)據(jù)一致。薈萃分析結(jié)果顯示:(一)治療2月末痰菌轉(zhuǎn)陰:有10篇文獻(xiàn)入選,對(duì)照組976例治療組930例,與單純西醫(yī)治療對(duì)照組相比,OR=3.41,95%CI2.71～4.38,OR1且95%CI不包含1,總效應(yīng)檢測(cè)Z=10.09,P0.01,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,提示治療2月中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療組2月末痰菌轉(zhuǎn)陰率高于單純西醫(yī)治療組。(二)治療2月末空洞閉合:有6篇文獻(xiàn)入選:對(duì)照組210例治療組232例,與單純西醫(yī)治療對(duì)照組相比OR=3.87,95%CI 1.91～7.83,OR1且95%CI不包含1,總效應(yīng)檢測(cè)Z=5.62,P0.01,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,提示治療2月中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療空洞閉合率高于單純西醫(yī)治療組。(三)治療2月末病灶吸收:有7篇文獻(xiàn)入選:對(duì)照組526例治療組560例,與單純西醫(yī)治療對(duì)照組相比OR=2.52,95%CI1.64～3.87,OR1且95%CI不包含1,總效應(yīng)檢測(cè)Z=4.23,P0.01,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,提示治療2月中西醫(yī)結(jié)合組病灶吸收率高于單純西醫(yī)治療組。(四)治療6月末痰菌轉(zhuǎn)陰:有10篇文獻(xiàn)入選:對(duì)照組847例治療組872例,與單純西醫(yī)治療對(duì)照組相比OR=4.3,95%CI 2.78～6.65,OR1且95%CI不包含1,總效應(yīng)檢測(cè)Z=6.54,P0.01,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,提示治療6月中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療組痰菌轉(zhuǎn)陰率高于單純西醫(yī)治療組。(五)治療6月末空洞閉合:有8篇文獻(xiàn)入選:對(duì)照組295例治療組322例,與單純西醫(yī)治療對(duì)照組相比OR=2.24,95%CI 1.46～3.44,OR1且95%CI不包含1,總效應(yīng)檢測(cè)Z=3.68,P0.01,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,提示治療6月中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療組空洞閉合率高于單純西醫(yī)治療組。(六)治療6月末X線病灶吸收:有10篇文獻(xiàn)入選:對(duì)照組641例治療組696例,與單純西醫(yī)治療相比OR=3.49,95%CI 2.47～4.94,Z=7.08,P0.01,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,提示治療6月中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療組X線病灶吸收率高于單純西醫(yī)治療組。(七)臨床療效:有7篇文獻(xiàn)入選:對(duì)照組567例治療組604例,與單純西醫(yī)治療相比OR=3.32,95%CI 2.15～5.14,OR1且95%CI不包含1,合并效應(yīng)量的檢驗(yàn)Z=5.41,P0.01,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,提示中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療組臨床療效高于單純西醫(yī)治療組。結(jié)論中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療初治肺結(jié)核,治療2月末及6月末,在痰菌轉(zhuǎn)陰、空洞閉合及X線病灶吸收均高于單純西醫(yī)治療,臨床療效中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療優(yōu)于單純西醫(yī)治療。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the curative effect of combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis with pulmonary tuberculosis "," Chinese medicine "and" western medicine "," soup "," party "as the key words, the computer retrieval Chinese Journal Full-text Database (CNKI), Wanfang Data knowledge platform, Chinese PSTP - VIP information, treatment of primary pulmonary tuberculosis in literature about the combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine in PubMed, according to the Cochrane evaluation manual evaluation, and submit data for meta-analysis, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 statistical software, classification variables to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results there were 974 literatures, including the title, author's name, and the source, check out the remaining 325 articles, reading the title and abstract excluding the related literature, the remaining 40 references for further reading the whole text, excluding incomplete data, different observation index and non random Machine control (RCT) literature, finally 16 articles were included in the analysis of 3100 cases of patients, 1589 cases of combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine group, western medicine treatment group 1521 cases, two groups of baseline data. The meta-analysis showed that: (a) treatment at the end of 2 negative sputum: 10 literatures were selected, the control group 976 patients in the treatment group 930 cases, control group compared with the pure western medicine treatment, OR=3.41,95%CI2.71 ~ 4.38, OR1 and 95%CI do not contain 1, the total effect of detection of Z=10.09, P0.01, the difference was statistically significant, indicating that the treatment of combining traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment group in February 2 at the end of the sputum negative conversion rate is higher than the western medicine treatment group (two) of 2 at the end of treatment. Cavity closure: 6 articles were included: 210 cases in the control group and 232 cases in the treatment group, the control group from 1.91 to 7.83 OR=3.87,95%CI compared with the pure western medicine treatment, OR1 and 95%CI do not contain 1, the total effect of detection of Z=5.62, P0.01, the difference was statistically significant, indicating that the treatment of February combined treatment of TCM and Western Medicine The cavity closure rate is higher than the pure western medicine treatment group (three). 2 at the end of treatment: the lesions absorption of 7 articles were included: 526 cases in the control group and 560 cases in the treatment group, the control group to 3.87 OR=2.52,95%CI1.64 compared with the pure western medicine treatment, OR1 and 95%CI do not contain 1, the total effect of detection of Z=4.23, P0.01, the difference was statistically significant, suggesting that the combination of TCM and Western medicine treatment in February the focus absorption rate is higher than the pure western medicine treatment group (four). 6 at the end of treatment negative sputum: 10 literatures were included: 847 cases in the control group and 872 cases in the treatment group, the control group from 2.78 to 6.65 OR=4.3,95%CI compared with the pure western medicine treatment, OR1 and 95%CI do not contain 1, the total effect of detection Z=6.54. P0.01, the difference was statistically significant, indicating that the treatment in June, combining traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment group the sputum negative conversion rate higher than the treatment group western medicine. (five) 6 at the end of treatment: void closure 8 articles included: 295 cases of control group, 322 cases in the treatment group, compared with the pure western medicine treatment Compared with OR=2.24,95%CI 1.46 ~ 3.44, OR1 and 95%CI do not contain 1, the total effect of detection of Z=3.68, P0.01, the difference was statistically significant, indicating that the treatment of combining traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment group June cavity closure rate higher than the treatment group western medicine. (six) absorption treatment at the end of 6 there are 10 X-ray lesions: Literature: selected 641 cases in the control group the treatment group of 696 cases, compared with the pure western medicine treatment of 2.47 ~ 4.94 OR=3.49,95%CI, Z=7.08, P0.01, the difference was statistically significant, indicating that the treatment of combining traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment group June X-ray focus absorption rate is higher than the pure western medicine treatment group. (seven) clinical curative effect: 7 articles were included: 567 cases in the control group and the treatment group of 604 cases. The pure western medicine treatment compared to OR=3.32,95%CI from 2.15 to 5.14, OR1 and 95%CI do not contain 1, the combined effect of the amount of the test of Z=5.41, P0.01, the difference was statistically significant, suggesting that combined with the clinical effect of treatment group was higher than that of Western medicine treatment group and Western medicine. Conclusion the traditional Chinese medicine and Western Medicine Combined with the treatment of the initial treatment of tuberculosis, treatment at the end of 2 and the end of 6, sputum smear negative, cavity closure and X-ray lesion absorption were higher than that of Western medicine alone. The clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine is better than that of Western medicine alone.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：R521

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓治文;;133例初治肺結(jié)核就診延遲原因分析[J];哈爾濱醫(yī)藥;2008年03期

2 仵倩紅;王西臨;;立復(fù)欣治療42例重癥初治肺結(jié)核的臨床觀察[J];內(nèi)蒙古中醫(yī)藥;2010年17期

3 王前云;陸蕙君;;初治肺結(jié)核166例延誤因素的分析與對(duì)策[J];南通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);1990年04期

4 陳利輝;418例初治肺結(jié)核患者被延誤診斷情況分析[J];實(shí)用預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);1996年04期

5 許洪忠;李兆坤;;353例初治肺結(jié)核不住院化療臨床分析[J];中國(guó)校醫(yī);1996年01期

6 趙亞玲;257例初治肺結(jié)核病人實(shí)行規(guī)范管理效果分析[J];廣西醫(yī)學(xué);2002年07期

7 李曦,岳冀;利福霉素靜滴與口服治療初治肺結(jié)核臨床對(duì)比觀察[J];四川醫(yī)學(xué);2002年06期

8 曹桂華;邳州市105例初治肺結(jié)核病診斷延遲情況分析[J];中國(guó)校醫(yī);2002年06期

9 李鴻來(lái);33例初治肺結(jié)核惡化原因分析[J];江蘇預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2003年02期

10 柳東時(shí),李敏強(qiáng),丁健全;303例初治肺結(jié)核調(diào)查分析[J];實(shí)用預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2003年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 胡善朋;王麗;;老年初治肺結(jié)核的動(dòng)態(tài)X線對(duì)照分析[A];2005年中國(guó)防癆協(xié)會(huì)全國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2005年

2 鄭春華;張洪球;;125例老年初治肺結(jié)核臨床分析[A];2009香港-北京-杭州內(nèi)科論壇暨2009年浙江省內(nèi)科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2009年

3 馬文;杜娟;;初治肺結(jié)核合并糖尿病62例臨床觀察[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)第12次全國(guó)內(nèi)科學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2009年

4 李洪敏;劉翠華;陳紅兵;劉琳;蘇銳;張霞;;中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療初治肺結(jié)核的臨床研究[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)結(jié)核病學(xué)分會(huì)2010年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2010年

5 魏淑貞;陳求揚(yáng);梁慶福;趙永;林建;林勇明;;262例初治肺結(jié)核患者不同年齡組耐藥性分析[A];2011年中國(guó)防癆協(xié)會(huì)全國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2011年

6 石萍;;立復(fù)欣與利福平治療初治肺結(jié)核100例臨床療效觀察[A];中國(guó)防癆雜志2003第25卷增刊——2003年中國(guó)防癆協(xié)會(huì)全國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2003年

7 李嫣紅;馮寶玲;;老年初治肺結(jié)核43例臨床分析[A];2005年中國(guó)防癆協(xié)會(huì)全國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2005年

8 李麗霞;易來(lái)龍;彭健梅;胡春梅;;外來(lái)人口初治肺結(jié)核復(fù)發(fā)因素分析[A];2005年中國(guó)防癆協(xié)會(huì)全國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2005年

9 曾友進(jìn);;敦煌地區(qū)初治肺結(jié)核病人就診及診斷情況調(diào)查[A];2005年中國(guó)防癆協(xié)會(huì)全國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2005年

10 榮學(xué)東;;卡介菌多糖核酸注射液在初治肺結(jié)核治療中的應(yīng)用[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)結(jié)核病學(xué)分會(huì)2006年學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 趙曉慧;維生素D受體基因多態(tài)性與初治肺結(jié)核補(bǔ)充維生素D療效相關(guān)性研究[D];河北醫(yī)科大學(xué);2015年

2 楊盛婭;中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療初治肺結(jié)核的薈萃分析[D];浙江中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2017年

3 吳碧彤;母牛分枝桿菌菌苗聯(lián)合化療對(duì)老年初治肺結(jié)核的療效分析[D];廣州醫(yī)學(xué)院;2009年

4 程威;李孔定抗癆經(jīng)驗(yàn)方聯(lián)合FDC治療繼發(fā)性初治肺結(jié)核70例療效評(píng)估及辨證論治初步探討[D];成都中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1453562