本文選題：知識(shí)聯(lián)盟　切入點(diǎn)：模糊博弈　出處：《西安理工大學(xué)》2017年博士論文

【摘要】：伴隨我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的新常態(tài)及“十三五”規(guī)劃對(duì)企業(yè)知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)型的重視,在科技創(chuàng)新的國(guó)家戰(zhàn)略背景下,企業(yè)聯(lián)盟方式早已由產(chǎn)品聯(lián)盟轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橹R(shí)聯(lián)盟,而企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟就是各成員企業(yè)為了獲取更大利益而結(jié)合在一起的集成體,這個(gè)集成體的成功構(gòu)建與健康發(fā)展,取決于各成員企業(yè)之間的高效合作,亟需對(duì)共同擁有的資源進(jìn)行優(yōu)化配置,對(duì)聯(lián)盟收益進(jìn)行合理地協(xié)商分配,本質(zhì)上可視為多人合作博弈問題。然而,以往國(guó)內(nèi)外很多研究者大都借助傳統(tǒng)合作博弈解決企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟利益分配問題,但傳統(tǒng)博弈的合作格局已無(wú)法滿足現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中成員企業(yè)的合作需求,各成員企業(yè)更多的情況下并不是以全部資源完全參與到某個(gè)特定知識(shí)聯(lián)盟中,而是以部分資源不同程度地與多個(gè)聯(lián)盟進(jìn)行合作。在由傳統(tǒng)的完全合作格局向現(xiàn)實(shí)中的部分合作格局轉(zhuǎn)變的需求及其設(shè)計(jì)環(huán)境下,本文以知識(shí)聯(lián)盟成員合作的模糊特性為突破口,以模糊合作博弈理論為支撐,以構(gòu)建均衡的模糊合作博弈格局為軀干,以尋求最優(yōu)的合作利益分配方案為驅(qū)動(dòng),形成基于模糊博弈的企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟利益分配研究框架及方法論體系,主要體現(xiàn)在:(1)提煉了企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟成員合作的模糊特性。首先,借助模糊數(shù)表示成員企業(yè)參與知識(shí)聯(lián)盟的程度,將企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟成員合作的過(guò)程視為通過(guò)成員企業(yè)、參與度、策略、收益等基本要素所呈現(xiàn)的模糊合作博弈過(guò)程。然后,借助完全信息與不完全信息下成員選擇博弈,分析了成員企業(yè)建立長(zhǎng)期合作伙伴關(guān)系的選擇策略。最后,基于參與度實(shí)現(xiàn)了企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟由傳統(tǒng)博弈下的合作到模糊博弈下合作的自然延拓。(2)分析了企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟合作利益的影響因素。首先,從聯(lián)盟總體和聯(lián)盟個(gè)體兩個(gè)層面,分析了企業(yè)組建知識(shí)聯(lián)盟是為了取得共同利益和協(xié)同效應(yīng),即實(shí)現(xiàn)1+12的效應(yīng)。然后,確定了企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟合作利益的關(guān)鍵影響變量,分別探索了知識(shí)聯(lián)盟總收益、成員企業(yè)的資源投入和預(yù)期效用、成員企業(yè)推測(cè)取得高收益的概率、結(jié)盟前收益等對(duì)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟合作利益的影響。最后,對(duì)企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟合作利益的特征函數(shù)進(jìn)行表述,并刻畫了企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟合作利益的模糊分配模型及其之間的包含關(guān)系。(3)研究了企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟利益分配的談判均衡。首先,提出了企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟利益分配研究應(yīng)遵循的基本原則。然后,概括了納什談判的公理化,并分析了兩企業(yè)及多企業(yè)納什談判模型及其均衡。最后,通過(guò)參與度的引入,將傳統(tǒng)博弈格局下成員企業(yè)針對(duì)談判點(diǎn)提出的異議及反異議進(jìn)行模糊化延拓,提出了模糊談判集概念,為具體模糊博弈格局下企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟最優(yōu)利益分配方案存在性論證提供服務(wù)。(4)構(gòu)建了知識(shí)聯(lián)盟成員企業(yè)的模糊網(wǎng)絡(luò)博弈及模糊平均單調(diào)博弈的合作格局。分析了企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟成員合作所呈現(xiàn)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)效應(yīng),及成員伙伴的平均貢獻(xiàn)值隨聯(lián)盟增大而提高的性質(zhì),得出了模糊網(wǎng)絡(luò)博弈及模糊平均單調(diào)博弈的均衡結(jié)果,論證了兩種博弈格局下企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟最優(yōu)利益分配方案的存在性,以及模糊談判分配方案與模糊核心分配方案的等價(jià)性,研究結(jié)論為決策者提供了一定的參考信息。(5)探索了利益分配視角下企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟可持續(xù)合作對(duì)策。為滿足企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟保留部分總收益值用于再合作的實(shí)際需求,將調(diào)整系數(shù)引入傳統(tǒng)分配模型,擴(kuò)展并構(gòu)建了廣義分配模型,為知識(shí)聯(lián)盟再分配及再合作提供理論依據(jù),我國(guó)5G知識(shí)聯(lián)盟案例分析表明:在知識(shí)聯(lián)盟不存在傳統(tǒng)最優(yōu)利益分配方案的情況下,可利用廣義分配模型尋求知識(shí)聯(lián)盟的廣義最優(yōu)分配方案,既解決了知識(shí)聯(lián)盟利益分配問題,又為知識(shí)聯(lián)盟可持續(xù)合作提供了對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:With the new normal for China's economic development and the "13th Five-Year" plan of the enterprise knowledge transformation and attention, in the national strategy background of technological innovation, has been changing from product enterprise alliances alliance and knowledge alliance, knowledge alliance is the member enterprises in order to obtain greater benefits and in combination with the integration of the integrated together. The successful construction and healthy development depends on the efficient cooperation among the member enterprises, to optimize the allocation of shared resources, the alliance benefits negotiated allocation reasonably, can be regarded as the essence of multi person cooperative game problem. However, many researchers at home and abroad mostly by means of traditional cooperative game, solve the problem of distribution of interests enterprise knowledge alliance, but the traditional game cooperation pattern has been unable to meet the member enterprises in the real life situation of cooperation needs more members of enterprises Not all the resources to fully participate in a particular knowledge alliance, but in different part of resources and a plurality of alliance partners. In the demand part cooperation pattern transformation from traditional pattern to fully cooperate in reality and design environment, fuzzy characteristics based on the knowledge alliance cooperation as a breakthrough, to fuzzy cooperative game theory, based on fuzzy cooperative game equilibrium pattern construction for the trunk, to find the optimal allocation scheme for cooperative interest drive, the formation of enterprise knowledge alliance profit distribution fuzzy game theory research framework and methodology based on the system, mainly reflected in: (1) extracting fuzzy characteristics of enterprise knowledge alliance members first, by means of fuzzy number member enterprises to participate in the knowledge alliance, knowledge alliance members will work as the member enterprises, participation, strategy Fuzzy cooperative game, the basic elements of income present. Then, with the help of the game under complete and incomplete information, analyzes the choice of strategy to establish a long-term cooperative partnership of the member enterprises. Finally, the participation of enterprise knowledge alliance from the traditional game to the fuzzy game under the cooperation of the natural extension based on the extension. (2) analyzed the influencing factors of cooperative benefit enterprise knowledge alliance. Firstly, from the alliance and alliance overall individual two aspects, analysis of enterprise knowledge alliance is to achieve mutual benefit and synergy effect is the realization of 1+12. Then, determine the key effect of cooperative benefit enterprise knowledge alliance variables. Total revenue respectively to explore the knowledge alliance, members of the enterprise resource investment and expected utility, members of the enterprise that has high probability of earnings, earnings before Alliance on knowledge alliance cooperation. Beneficial effect. Finally, the characteristic function of cooperative benefits in enterprise knowledge alliance are introduced, and characterize the relationship of fuzzy cooperative benefit allocation model including the enterprise knowledge alliance between and. (3) studied the negotiation interests distribution of enterprise knowledge alliance. Firstly, this paper puts forward the basic principles of the distribution of interests in enterprise knowledge alliance should follow. Then, summarized the axiomatic Nash talks, and analyzes two enterprises and enterprises Nash bargaining model and its equilibrium. Finally, through the introduction of participation, the traditional game pattern for the member enterprises to negotiate the objection and counter objection point fuzzy extension, put forward the fuzzy set concept of negotiation. Provide service demonstration for the optimal distribution of interests in enterprise knowledge alliance specific fuzzy game pattern. (4) proposed a fuzzy network game knowledge alliance and fuzzy mean The monotonous game pattern of cooperation. Analysis of network effects of enterprise knowledge alliance members, and members of the average contribution value and improve the properties of partners with the increase of the alliance, the fuzzy network game and the equilibrium results of fuzzy mean monotone game, demonstrates two game existence pattern of enterprise knowledge alliance optimal distribution of interests the scheme, and the equivalence of fuzzy negotiation allocation scheme and fuzzy core allocation scheme, the conclusion of the study can provide some reference information for decision makers. (5) to explore the enterprise knowledge alliance profit distribution from the perspective of sustainable cooperation strategy. To meet the enterprise knowledge alliance retained part of the total profit value for the actual demand of cooperation, will the adjustment coefficient is introduced into the traditional distribution model, extended and constructed general distribution model, to provide a theoretical basis for knowledge alliance redistribution and then cooperation, China's 5G knowledge alliance case Case analysis shows that: in the case of knowledge alliance does not exist traditional optimal profit distribution scheme, we can use generalized assignment model to search for generalized optimal distribution scheme of knowledge alliance, which not only solves the problem of knowledge alliance benefit distribution, but also provides countermeasures for knowledge alliance's sustainable cooperation.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F272

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李翠;薛惠鋒;;企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟的可持續(xù)發(fā)展對(duì)策研究——以利益分配為視角[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2016年12期

2 張煒;耿生玲;童英華;韓邦合;;基于模糊軟合作博弈的收益分配[J];江蘇師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2016年02期

3 高長(zhǎng)元;劉劃;王京;;基于模糊合作博弈的移動(dòng)云計(jì)算聯(lián)盟利益分配模型研究[J];科技與管理;2016年01期

4 余曉鐘;楊洋;劉維;;不同合作競(jìng)爭(zhēng)類型的組織學(xué)習(xí)策略研究[J];軟科學(xué);2015年11期

5 關(guān)菲;張強(qiáng);栗軍;;基于λ-最大相容類的粗糙規(guī)劃模型及其在企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟形成決策問題中的應(yīng)用[J];運(yùn)籌與管理;2015年02期

6 李翠;薛昱;王文勝;;基于平均單調(diào)博弈廣義解的收益再分配模型[J];控制與決策;2015年04期

7 商淑秀;張?jiān)偕?;虛擬企業(yè)知識(shí)共享演化博弈分析[J];中國(guó)軟科學(xué);2015年03期

8 李泉林;段燦;鄂成國(guó);楊碧蕊;;云資源提供商的合作博弈模型與收益分配研究[J];運(yùn)籌與管理;2014年04期

9 李翠;薛昱;;基于談判集的模糊合作博弈的收益分配方案[J];控制與決策;2014年11期

10 郭鵬;陳玲麗;;模糊環(huán)境下模糊聯(lián)盟收益分配模型和算法研究[J];模糊系統(tǒng)與數(shù)學(xué);2014年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 鄭月龍;基于演化博弈論的企業(yè)共性技術(shù)合作研發(fā)形成機(jī)制研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2015年

2 張建良;基于非合作博弈的分布式優(yōu)化模型及算法研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2014年

3 張艷菊;虛擬企業(yè)預(yù)期收益分享的模糊合作博弈分析[D];遼寧工程技術(shù)大學(xué);2013年

4 李群峰;知識(shí)型企業(yè)合作剩余分配討價(jià)還價(jià)博弈分析[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2011年

5 唐錦銓;面向產(chǎn)業(yè)集群的企業(yè)知識(shí)聯(lián)盟研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2009年

6 李江;基于知識(shí)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的企業(yè)網(wǎng)絡(luò)化創(chuàng)新能力研究[D];天津大學(xué);2008年

7 王昭;具有模糊支付的博弈問題及其應(yīng)用研究[D];北京理工大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李豪;基于合作博弈的供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)之間利益分配的研究[D];蘭州交通大學(xué);2014年

2 張磊生;產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟利益分配研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2013年

3 白辰;企業(yè)技術(shù)聯(lián)盟利益創(chuàng)造與分配機(jī)制研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2013年

4 浦培根;工程項(xiàng)目突發(fā)事件知識(shí)聯(lián)盟利益分配研究[D];天津大學(xué);2012年

5 李穎;基于知識(shí)溢出效應(yīng)的知識(shí)聯(lián)盟利益分配研究[D];西安電子科技大學(xué);2011年

6 徐小麗;博弈視角下的知識(shí)聯(lián)盟形成動(dòng)因與機(jī)制研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

7 汪之明;產(chǎn)學(xué)研聯(lián)盟利益分配機(jī)制研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2010年

8 朱s，

本文編號(hào)：1691213