本文關(guān)鍵詞：霧霾情景下公眾霧霾感知的演化過程及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為選擇研究　出處：《中國科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué)》2017年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 霧霾風(fēng)險(xiǎn) 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)感知 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為 有限記憶理論 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)責(zé)任歸因 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為屬性

【摘要】：近年來我國已經(jīng)歷了多次嚴(yán)重的霧霾天氣,霧霾大面積爆發(fā)的本質(zhì)是中國目前的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和不合理的人類活動(dòng)的警告,同時(shí)"霧霾"風(fēng)險(xiǎn)是目前各類環(huán)境風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的集中縮影和典型個(gè)例,迅速進(jìn)入大眾的視線,引起民眾廣泛的討論,也給現(xiàn)階段政府治理出了道難題。面對(duì)霧霾,民眾不禁追問霧霾污染應(yīng)該由誰來負(fù)責(zé)?作為普通大眾,我們應(yīng)該怎么做才能改變當(dāng)前"霧霾圍城"的現(xiàn)狀?霧霾天氣下的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為是指公眾為應(yīng)對(duì)霧霾風(fēng)險(xiǎn),減免受到霧霾危害而采取的應(yīng)對(duì)措施。霧霾問題作為環(huán)境問題的一種,對(duì)親環(huán)境行為的選擇也被視作為霧霾情景下的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為之一。親環(huán)境行為被學(xué)術(shù)界定義為通過改變?nèi)粘Ｐ袨閬頊p少自身對(duì)生態(tài)環(huán)境造成的負(fù)面影響,親環(huán)境行為包括環(huán)境友好行為和自我保護(hù)行為。近年來,隨著公眾對(duì)霧霾天氣及其危害的認(rèn)識(shí),以及環(huán)保意識(shí)和自我保護(hù)意識(shí)的提高,當(dāng)霧霾發(fā)生后,公眾往往會(huì)做出相應(yīng)的反應(yīng)和行為例如佩戴口罩、使用空氣凈化器、減少私家車使用、節(jié)約利用資源等,其中佩戴,口罩、使用空氣凈化器等可以被認(rèn)為是自我保護(hù)型行為,而減少私家車使用和節(jié)約利用資源可以被認(rèn)為是環(huán)境友好型行為。正確地引導(dǎo)公眾采取這兩種行為有利于政府開展霧霾治理。先前已有理論和研究探討了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)情景下公眾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為的影響因素,例如有限記憶理論、歸因理論以及防護(hù)性行為決策模型(PADM),他們都認(rèn)為個(gè)體的行為決策過程實(shí)際是一種對(duì)信息的加工并處理的模式,對(duì)信息進(jìn)行加工形成感知并最終影響行為決策。因此,本文將從霧霾信息接收、霧霾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)責(zé)任歸因以及霧霾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為屬性三個(gè)方面探討公眾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為決策的內(nèi)在機(jī)理,揭示信息、感知(風(fēng)險(xiǎn)感知及責(zé)任歸因)、行為屬性對(duì)行為決策的影響機(jī)制。本文通過文獻(xiàn)綜述、數(shù)學(xué)建模以及實(shí)證調(diào)研等方法,從三個(gè)方面開展研究:(1)研究了霧霾信息接收對(duì)公眾霧霾感知和行為意向的影響�；谟邢抻洃浝碚�,本研究構(gòu)建了公眾霧霾感知演化模型。每次霧霾事件發(fā)生后,各種媒體以及溝通渠道都會(huì)釋放相關(guān)霧霾信息,根據(jù)媒體議程設(shè)置,每次霧霾事件釋放的信息數(shù)量也會(huì)不同,公眾處理這些信息并形成感知。有限記憶理論中討論了記憶的近因效應(yīng)、聯(lián)想效應(yīng)和復(fù)述效應(yīng)對(duì)感知形成的影響,基于此我們?cè)O(shè)定了記憶率參數(shù)以及聯(lián)想率參數(shù)并通過遞歸算法歸納出霧霾情景下公眾感知和行為演化模型,并對(duì)該模型進(jìn)行仿真。結(jié)果表明當(dāng)公眾每次接收到的霧霾信息保持不變時(shí),他們的感知演化是一個(gè)呈單調(diào)上升趨勢(shì)但存在上限的函數(shù),公眾的記憶率和聯(lián)想率都會(huì)決定公眾記憶的上限。當(dāng)公眾接收到的霧霾信息呈現(xiàn)增長、減少或者先增長后減少的變化時(shí),他們的感知和行為意向也會(huì)保持同樣的變化態(tài)勢(shì),但相對(duì)信息變化存在著一定的滯后。(2)研究了霧霾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)責(zé)任歸因?qū)婏L(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為意向的影響。本研究通過整合歸因理論和防護(hù)性行為決策模型(PADM),將風(fēng)險(xiǎn)責(zé)任歸因作為一個(gè)重要變量,納入PADM模型中,構(gòu)建了一個(gè)新的研究框架。該框架假設(shè)公眾的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)感知受他們所依賴的信息來源影響,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)感知激發(fā)了他們對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)責(zé)任歸因的判斷并進(jìn)一步影響他們選擇采取自我保護(hù)型行為和環(huán)境友好型行為的意向。本研究以2013年底和2014年初發(fā)生大規(guī)模霧霾天氣為實(shí)證背景,調(diào)查了霧霾天氣的重災(zāi)區(qū)——安徽省合肥市地區(qū)的城市居民,通過問卷采訪了 420名受訪者,詢問他們對(duì)于霧霾信息來源偏好、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)感知、霧霾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)責(zé)任歸因以及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為選擇的看法,獲取了第一手的研究數(shù)據(jù)。多元回歸分析的結(jié)果回答了研究框架中提出的研究問題,結(jié)果表明依賴從非正式來源接收霧霾信息會(huì)導(dǎo)致較高的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)感知,較高的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)感知一方面會(huì)對(duì)公眾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)責(zé)任歸因產(chǎn)生正向影響,一方面也會(huì)促進(jìn)公眾采取風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為。公眾的信息來源偏好對(duì)其風(fēng)險(xiǎn)責(zé)任歸因產(chǎn)生正向影響,但影響會(huì)存在差異,例如從非正式來源接收風(fēng)險(xiǎn)信息往往會(huì)使個(gè)體將責(zé)任歸于公眾,而偏好媒體來源則會(huì)產(chǎn)生三種不同的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)責(zé)任歸因。霧霾責(zé)任歸因?qū)⒅苯佑绊懎h(huán)境友好行為意向,但不影響自我保護(hù)行為意向,當(dāng)公眾將霧霾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)歸因于自身不當(dāng)?shù)纳盍?xí)慣時(shí),他們會(huì)采取環(huán)保行為。(3)研究了霧霾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為屬性對(duì)公眾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為意向的影響。通過梳理PMT理論和PADM模型中對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為屬性的界定,我們將風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為屬性分為風(fēng)險(xiǎn)相關(guān)屬性和資源相關(guān)屬性,并構(gòu)建以這兩種行為屬性為核心變量的研究框架。我們假設(shè)公眾的人口統(tǒng)計(jì)特征會(huì)影響公眾對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)以及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為屬性的感知,這兩種感知以及公眾過往的行為經(jīng)驗(yàn)會(huì)最終影響他們的行為選擇意向。研究結(jié)果表明風(fēng)險(xiǎn)相關(guān)屬性都是影響公眾自我保護(hù)行為和環(huán)境友好行為的最顯著以及最重要變量,其影響程度大于資源相關(guān)屬性以及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)感知。資源相關(guān)屬性出乎意料地對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為也會(huì)采取正向影響而非負(fù)向影響。在本研究中,我們還討論了公眾過去的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為選擇對(duì)他們未來繼續(xù)選擇該行為的影響,結(jié)果表明過去的行為會(huì)對(duì)未來的行為選擇意向產(chǎn)生正向的影響。人口統(tǒng)計(jì)特征也會(huì)對(duì)行為產(chǎn)生直接影響,例如年齡較大的人往往生活更為節(jié)約,他們會(huì)傾向于選擇環(huán)境友好型行為。學(xué)歷則對(duì)自我保護(hù)行為意向有顯著的負(fù)向影響,也就是說學(xué)歷越高,他們?cè)讲粌A向于采取自我保護(hù)行為。本研究的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)在于:第一,從個(gè)體記憶角度,研究信息接收模式對(duì)個(gè)體感知和行為應(yīng)對(duì)的影響,這在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理領(lǐng)域尚屬首次。第二,本研究將風(fēng)險(xiǎn)責(zé)任歸因這一變量整合進(jìn)基于防護(hù)性行為決策模型所搭建的研究框架中,并得出一個(gè)新的研究框架。利用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)責(zé)任歸因這一變量,我們能很好地理解和解釋公眾對(duì)事件責(zé)任歸因的看法是如何影響他們后續(xù)的行為的。第三,本研究將環(huán)境領(lǐng)域被廣泛接受與討論的社會(huì)學(xué)用語"親環(huán)境行為"引入到霧霾背景下的個(gè)體行為研究中,使得本研究的結(jié)論更具有指導(dǎo)意義。第四,本研究引入了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為屬性這一概念,并檢驗(yàn)了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為屬性在行為決策過程起到的作用,這在國內(nèi)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理領(lǐng)域尚屬首次。本研究也具有一些實(shí)踐意義,有助于管理者深層次地、有差別地理解公眾霧霾應(yīng)對(duì)的心理和行為,從而針對(duì)其認(rèn)知和行為進(jìn)行有效引導(dǎo),為政府合理干預(yù)公眾霧霾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)感知和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為提供了理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Our country has experienced a number of serious haze weather in recent years, the nature of the haze is a large area of the outbreak of Chinese current economic development and unreasonable human activities and warning, "haze" is the epitome of all kinds of environmental risk concentration risk and typical case, quickly into the public eye, causing widespread public discussion. To present a problem of governance. In the face of haze, haze pollution can not help but ask people who should be responsible for? As the general public, what should we do to change the current situation of "haze siege"? The risk coping behavior of haze weather refers to the public to deal with haze risk, and take measures to deal with the harm of relief by haze. As one of the environmental problems, the choice of environmental behavior is also considered as one of the risk response behaviors under the fog and haze situation. The pro environmental behavior is defined by academic circles to reduce the negative impact of self on the ecological environment by changing daily behaviors, including environmental friendly behaviors, environmental friendly behaviors and self protective behaviors. In recent years, with the public awareness of the haze weather and its harm, as well as environmental awareness and self-protection awareness, when haze occurred, the public tend to react and act such as wearing masks, air purifiers, reduce the use of private cars, the economical use of resources, including wearing masks, air purifiers and other uses can be considered to be self protective behavior, and reduce the use of private cars and the economical use of resources can be considered environmentally friendly behavior. The correct guidance to the public to take these two acts is conducive to the government to carry out haze governance. Previous theory and research to explore the factors influencing the risk coping behavior of public risk scenarios, such as limited memory theory, attribution theory and protective behavior decision model (PADM), they believe that the decision-making process of individuals is a kind of information processing and processing mode, the information processing and the final formation of perception effect of behavioral decision making. Therefore, this article will explore the internal mechanism of public risk decision-making behavior, information receiving from the haze haze and haze risk attribution of responsibility risk coping behavior attribute three aspects, revealing information, perception (risk perception and attribution of responsibility), the influence mechanism of behavior attributes on decision-making behavior. Based on literature review, mathematical modeling and empirical research, this paper studies from three aspects: (1) the impact of haze information reception on public haze perception and behavioral intention is studied. Based on the finite memory theory, a public fog haze perception evolution model is built in this study. After every haze event, all kinds of media and communication channels will release related haze information. According to the media agenda, the amount of information released by each haze event will also be different. The public will process these information and form a perception. Limited in memory theory discusses the influence of recency effect, memory effect and Lenovo rehearsal effect on perceived forms based on this, we set the rate of memory parameters and Lenovo rates through recursive algorithm parameters and summed up the haze scenarios the public perception and behavior evolution model, and the simulation of the model. The results show that when the haze information received by the public remains unchanged, their perception evolution is a monotonic upward trend, but there is an upper bound function. The memory and association rate of the public will determine the upper limit of public memory. When the haze information received by the public shows a change of growth or decrease or increase and then decrease, their perception and behavioral intention will remain the same, but the relative information change is lagging behind. (2) the influence of haze risk liability attribution on public risk response behavior intention was studied. This study integrates attribution theory and defensive behavior decision making model (PADM), and takes attribution of risk responsibility as an important variable into PADM model, and constructs a new research framework. The framework assumes that public risk perception is influenced by the information sources they rely on. Risk perception motivates their judgment of attribution of risk responsibility and further influences their intention to adopt self protective behavior and environment-friendly behavior. In this study, by the end of 2013 and early 2014 large-scale haze to empirically investigated the haze weather disaster area -- Hefei city in Anhui Province, through questionnaire interviews with 420 respondents, asking for information sources of haze preference and risk perception, risk and risk response haze responsibility attribution behavior choice view to obtain research data, first hand. The results of multiple regression analysis to answer the research questions put forward the research framework, the results show that dependence from informal sources of haze receiving information will lead to higher risk perception, risk perception of high hand will have a positive impact on the public risk attribution of responsibility, on the one hand will take the risk coping behavior to promote the public. Public information preferences have a positive impact on their attribution of risk liability, but there are differences. For example, receiving information from informal sources often causes individuals to blame their responsibilities on the public, while the preference of media sources will result in three different risk attributions. Haze responsibility attribution will directly affect environmental friendly behavior intention, but it will not affect self-protection behavior intention. When the public attribute haze risk to their own improper habits, they will take environmental behavior. (3) the effects of the behavior attributes of the haze risk coping behavior on the public risk response behavior intention were studied. By combing the definition of risk response behavior attributes in PMT theory and PADM model, we divide risk response attributes into risk related attributes and resource related attributes, and construct these two behavioral attributes as core variables.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：X51

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 程鵬;霧霾情景下公眾霧霾感知的演化過程及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)對(duì)行為選擇研究[D];中國科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué);2017年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李然;溫度在消費(fèi)者企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任歸因中的作用研究[D];南京大學(xué);2014年

2 申盼;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任活動(dòng)對(duì)消費(fèi)者責(zé)任歸因的影響[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

3 肖玫;企業(yè)道歉聲明對(duì)責(zé)任歸因和公眾憤怒的影響[D];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué);2014年

4 程志方;產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)下責(zé)任歸因、情感對(duì)補(bǔ)救預(yù)期的影響[D];華中科技大學(xué);2010年

5 滕宏磊;甜苦體驗(yàn)對(duì)消費(fèi)者企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任歸因的作用研究[D];南京大學(xué);2015年

6 劉洋;產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)下責(zé)任歸因?qū)π湃涡迯?fù)效能影響研究[D];中國礦業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

7 吳碧琴;情景條件、決策過程對(duì)作為/不作為后悔的影響[D];浙江理工大學(xué);2011年

8 王懷勇;企業(yè)員工公平感研究：責(zé)任歸因的視角[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年

9 唐樂琴;重復(fù)決策中責(zé)任歸因?qū)蠡谝?guī)避行為的影響[D];寧波大學(xué);2013年

10 何新漢;資源兩難博弈中人際評(píng)價(jià)、責(zé)任歸因及負(fù)性情緒的研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1342520