本文關(guān)鍵詞：表面活性劑修飾磁性納米材料及其在環(huán)境有機(jī)污染物分析中的應(yīng)用　出處：《蘇州科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 有機(jī)污染物 苯脲類除草劑 磁性固相萃取 表面活性劑 超聲萃取 超高效液相色譜-質(zhì)譜

【摘要】：磁性固相萃取作為一種新型的前處理方式在環(huán)境監(jiān)測(cè)領(lǐng)域已經(jīng)得到了廣泛的應(yīng)用,其核心組成部分是磁性吸附材料,但是商品化的磁性材料合成條件較為苛刻,且價(jià)格過(guò)于昂貴,實(shí)驗(yàn)成本較高。通過(guò)實(shí)驗(yàn)室自制的磁性材料作為磁性固相萃取的吸附劑,不僅合成步驟較為簡(jiǎn)單,也可大大降低實(shí)驗(yàn)成本。本文主要是通過(guò)實(shí)驗(yàn)室自制的磁性納米材料,并用表面活性劑對(duì)其修飾,將修飾后的磁性材料用作磁性固相萃取中的吸附劑對(duì)水樣和土壤樣品中常見(jiàn)的四種苯脲類有機(jī)污染物(滅草隆、敵草隆、綠麥隆、異丙隆)進(jìn)行測(cè)定,主要研究?jī)?nèi)容:(1)磁性吸附劑的合成:采用經(jīng)典的共沉淀法,在堿性條件下通過(guò)優(yōu)化滴加氨水的時(shí)間來(lái)合成磁性納米粒子(Fe_3O_4MNPs)。將合成的Fe_3O_4MNPs先用SiO_2修飾,以減少Fe_3O_4MNPs的團(tuán)聚現(xiàn)象,再用十二烷基硫酸鈉(SDS)修飾,使Fe_3O_4MNPs表面具有吸附化合物的孔穴。通過(guò)優(yōu)化SiO_2以及SDS的用量,使得所制備的磁性材料粒徑更小,分散性更好。將合成的磁性材料進(jìn)行掃描電鏡和傅里葉紅外表征。合成出的磁性材料表面具有很多的孔穴,對(duì)待測(cè)物質(zhì)具有吸附性。(2)用實(shí)驗(yàn)室自制的磁性材料作為磁性固相萃取中的吸附劑,并結(jié)合超高效液相色譜-質(zhì)譜法測(cè)定水樣中的四種苯脲類化合物,并與商品化的磁性材料進(jìn)行了對(duì)比�？疾炝嘶罨軇┓N類及用量、磁性材料的種類及用量、pH、酸的種類、洗脫溶劑的種類及體積、振蕩時(shí)間等因素對(duì)四種苯脲類除草劑回收率的影響。確定最佳優(yōu)化條件為:50m L的水樣用鹽酸調(diào)節(jié)到pH=5,活化溶劑為5m L的乙腈,80KHz超聲分散3min,磁性吸附劑的用量為70mg,洗脫溶劑為4m L乙腈,振蕩15min,四種待測(cè)物質(zhì)的加標(biāo)回收率在86.2%-95.4%之間。方法的線性范圍是0.05-5.0μg/L,相關(guān)性系數(shù)都大于0.999,相對(duì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)偏差3.0-6.6%,方法檢出限(LOD)范圍為10.9-13.3ng/L。用乙腈浸泡磁性材料,然后低溫烘干后重復(fù)利用。磁性材料經(jīng)過(guò)多次的重復(fù)使用,未見(jiàn)待測(cè)物質(zhì)的回收率有明顯下降趨勢(shì)。該方法具有快速、靈敏、磁性材料可重復(fù)使用且減少分析過(guò)程中有機(jī)試劑對(duì)環(huán)境污染等優(yōu)點(diǎn)。(3)采用超聲提取法先提取土壤中的四種苯脲類物質(zhì),將提取液氮吹近干后加入水稀釋復(fù)溶,將磁性固相萃取法用作土壤中待測(cè)物的凈化技術(shù),建立了土壤中四種苯脲類除草劑的前處理方法,并采用超高效液相色譜質(zhì)譜法進(jìn)行定性定量分析。并將磁性固相萃取法與固相萃取法進(jìn)行了對(duì)比。考察了萃取溶劑、超聲頻率、萃取時(shí)間、初始超聲萃取溫度、稀釋水樣體積、磁性納米材料的用量、振蕩時(shí)間、洗脫溶劑的體積對(duì)土壤中待測(cè)物質(zhì)回收率的影響。最佳萃取條件是:10m L乙醇在80KHz條件下超聲15min,初始超聲溫度為40℃。凈化條件是:150m L的稀釋水樣,100mg的磁性吸附材料,25min振蕩時(shí)間,6m L乙腈洗脫�；厥章试�79.8~85.2%之間,方法的線性范圍是5-200μg/kg,相關(guān)性系數(shù)都大于0.995,相對(duì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)偏差4.6-7.9%,方法檢出限(LOD)范圍為0.2-0.7μg/kg,該方法具有操作簡(jiǎn)便,檢出限低,靈敏度高等特點(diǎn),適用于土壤中痕量苯脲類物質(zhì)的測(cè)定。
[Abstract]:Magnetic solid phase extraction as a new pretreatment method has been widely used in the field of environmental monitoring, the core part is the magnetic adsorption materials, magnetic materials but commercial synthesis conditions are harsh, and the price is too expensive, the high cost of experiment. Through the self-made magnetic material as magnetic adsorbents for solid-phase extraction not only, the synthesis step is relatively simple, but also can greatly reduce the experimental cost. This paper is mainly through the self-made magnetic nano materials, and surfactant on the modification, the magnetic material of modified magnetic solid phase extraction as adsorption agent on water and soil samples of four kinds of common phenylureas organic pollutants (monuron and diuron and Chlortoluron and isoproturon) were determined. The main research contents are as follows: (1) the synthesis of magnetic adsorbents by co precipitation method in the classic, alkaline conditions Under the optimized by adding ammonia time to synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles (Fe_3O_4MNPs). The first synthesis of Fe_3O_4MNPs modified with SiO_2, in order to reduce the agglomeration of Fe_3O_4MNPs, with twelve sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) modification of the Fe_3O_4MNPs surface hole with adsorption compounds. Through the optimization of SiO_2 and the amount of SDS, makes the magnetic the material with smaller size particle preparation, better dispersion. The magnetic material is synthesized by scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectra. The synthesized magnetic material surface has many holes, measured with adsorption material. (2) with self-made magnetic materials as adsorbent magnetic solid phase extraction, and determination of four phenylurea compounds in water using ultra high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, compared with commercial and magnetic materials. The effect of activation of solvent type and amount, the kind of magnetic material Type and dosage, pH, acid type, type and volume of elution solvent. The effect of oscillation time and other factors on four herbicides recovery. Determine the best optimized condition is: 50m L water sample with hydrochloric acid to adjust to pH=5, activation of acetonitrile solvent for L 5m, 80KHz 3min, ultrasonic dispersion, magnetic adsorption the dosage is 70mg, elution solvent is 4m L acetonitrile, 15min four kinds of oscillation, the recovery rate of the substance to be tested in 86.2%-95.4%. The linear range is 0.05-5.0 ~ g/L, the correlation coefficient is greater than 0.999, the relative standard deviation is 3.0-6.6%, the detection limit of the method (LOD) with acetonitrile immersion magnetic materials for 10.9-13.3ng/L. then, low temperature drying after repeated use of magnetic materials. After used repeatedly, no analyte recovery rate decreased significantly. The method is rapid, sensitive, magnetic materials can be reused and reduced in the process of organic analysis Reagents on environmental pollution and other advantages. (3) extract in soil four phenylurea compounds extracted by ultrasonic extraction method, adding water blown nearly dry after liquid nitrogen dilution solution, the magnetic solid phase extraction method for the purification technology of soil analytes, established a pretreatment method of four phenylureas the herbicide in the soil, and the use of mass spectrometry UPLC qualitative and quantitative analysis. Comparing the magnetic solid phase extraction and solid-phase extraction method. The effects of extraction solvent, extraction time, ultrasonic frequency, ultrasonic extraction and initial temperature, dilution water volume, magnetic nano material dosage, oscillation time, elution solvent the volume of soil to be measured in the material recovery rate. The best extraction conditions are: 10M L 80KHz 15min in ethanol ultrasonic conditions, initial temperature of 40 DEG. Ultrasonic purification conditions are: dilution water 150m L, magnetic adsorbent 100mg, 2 5min 6m L oscillation time, acetonitrile. The recovery rate was 79.8~85.2%, the linear range is 5-200 ~ g/kg, the correlation coefficient is greater than 0.995, the relative standard deviation is 4.6-7.9%, the detection limit of the method (LOD) is in the range of 0.2-0.7 g/kg, this method has the advantages of simple operation, low detection limit, high sensitivity, suitable for determination of soil trace phenylurea compounds.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：X830;TB383.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張?jiān)?韓忠保;吳雨杭;劉麗艷;辛士剛;張洪波;于湛;;固相微萃取技術(shù)在環(huán)境分析中的應(yīng)用[J];化學(xué)工程與裝備;2016年03期

2 李佳鈺;吳雨杭;李昊原;劉麗艷;王瑩;于湛;;固相微萃取技術(shù)與應(yīng)用研究進(jìn)展[J];山東化工;2016年01期

3 連麗麗;郭亭秀;吳玉清;金麗;婁大偉;孫大志;;磁性固相萃取-液相色譜法測(cè)定環(huán)境水樣中痕量的微囊藻毒素[J];分析化學(xué);2015年12期

4 曹江平;解啟龍;周繼梅;易宗慧;;分散液液微萃取技術(shù)在食品分析中的應(yīng)用進(jìn)展[J];分析測(cè)試學(xué)報(bào);2015年05期

5 劉淑延;陳琦;吳彬;楊曉寧;;SDS表面活性劑在納米尺度多層石墨烯的吸附自組裝分子模擬[J];化工學(xué)報(bào);2015年07期

6 戚平;周慶瓊;林子豪;羅莉妮;張學(xué)武;;磁性固相萃取-液相色譜法測(cè)定環(huán)境水樣中多種堿性染料[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2015年02期

7 成昊;張麗君;張磊;張占恩;;基質(zhì)固相分散萃取-分散液相微萃取-氣相色譜質(zhì)譜法測(cè)定土壤中擬除蟲(chóng)菊酯類農(nóng)藥[J];分析化學(xué);2015年01期

8 閆蕊;邵明媛;孫長(zhǎng)華;劉曉玲;宋大千;張寒琦;于愛(ài)民;;加速溶劑萃取-高效液相色譜串聯(lián)質(zhì)譜法測(cè)定土壤中鄰苯二甲酸酯[J];分析化學(xué);2014年06期

9 錢(qián)云;張麗君;張占恩;;分散固相萃取法直接萃取水樣中16種鄰苯二甲酸酯[J];分析科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

10 李歡;史龍梅;周建科;;微萃取瓶富集-高效液相色譜法測(cè)定茶飲料中脲類除草劑[J];食品與發(fā)酵科技;2013年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李娜;食品中三嗪類和苯脲類除草劑萃取的研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

2 楊靜;納米材料用于有機(jī)污染物的磁固相萃取和光催化降解[D];南京大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 陳園;高效液相色譜串聯(lián)質(zhì)譜法測(cè)定水中苯脲類除草劑的前處理技術(shù)方法研究[D];蘇州科技學(xué)院;2015年

2 成昊;基質(zhì)固相分散—分散液相微萃取測(cè)定土壤中的有機(jī)污染物[D];蘇州科技學(xué)院;2015年

3 楊立芳;液相色譜—質(zhì)譜法分析水中多種除草劑殘留的研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2007年

4 張娟;環(huán)境中苯脲類除草劑的分析和處理[D];南京工業(yè)大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1438458