清代“發(fā)!弊镅芯
[Abstract]:"Tomb" behavior, is a long-standing social phenomenon. The starting point of Maotsuka, some from the pursuit of property, some from revenge, and other complex factors. Mausoleum is a group of charges that take many forms, including activities related to grave theft, of which grave theft is the most representative. In ancient Chinese society, people had a view of life and death and filial piety to their ancestors. They all hoped that their ancestors would be able to live in peace and treat the dead as if they were living. Respect for the dead is a great comfort to the living and a blessing for future generations. The act of "mound" seriously undermined the traditional ideas of the ancients, so the rulers of all dynasties enacted harsh laws to crack down on this kind of behavior. In this paper, the author sums up the typical cases of the crime of "Maitsuka" in Qing Dynasty, and analyzes the concept of etiquette and law in ancient China, which is reflected in the typical cases of the crime of "Maitsuka" in Qing Dynasty. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into three chapters, the main points of its content are as follows: the introduction of the article mainly introduces the background and significance of the topic, literature review, The ideas and methods of the research and the research features and innovations of the thesis. The first chapter summarizes the crime of "tombs" before Qing Dynasty, first describes the social background of ancient society attaching importance to the protection of graves, mainly in the aspects of ancient people's view of life and death, filial piety and the advocate of rulers, and then takes the dynasties as the sequence. It describes the phenomenon of "mound" before Qing Dynasty and the law of "Maitsuka". In the second chapter, according to the different types of crimes in the Qing Dynasty, the author classifies the law in the Qing Dynasty into four categories, and then narrates the reform and change of the law in the late Qing Dynasty, and the process of the reform and change of the law, and the process of the reform and change in the law of the Maitsuka in the end of the Qing Dynasty, according to the different types of crimes. Reflects the ancient Chinese "ceremony and law dispute"; The third chapter is the most important part of this paper. Combined with the law of the Qing Dynasty, this chapter classifies the typical cases of the crime of Maotsuka into five different types, and then analyzes the judicial disposition of these crimes by Qing Dynasty. In Qing Dynasty, the circumstances of the crime are different, and the corresponding judicial disposition is different in Qing Dynasty, which fully reflects the principle of the equivalent of crime and punishment. The judicial disposition of the law of Qing Dynasty to the behavior of "mound" between relatives should be more important than that of ordinary people, which reflects the maintenance of the kindred feelings of the law of Qing Dynasty. In the crime of "mound" between relatives, the judicial disposition of the Qing Dynasty to the humble children should be more important than that of the superior, which reflects the unequal relationship between the superior and inferior in ancient times. With the incessant increase of the cases of "mound" in the social life of Qing Dynasty, the Qing law has become more and more strict, and its judicial disposition to the crime of "mausoleum" has become more and more severe, and the ancient concept of etiquette and law has influenced the Qing law more and more deeply. Combined with the social background of ruling the country according to law, the conclusion of the article advocates that people should protect the final dignity of the dead through legal means.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:青海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:K249
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 顧春軍;;“發(fā)冢”考[J];文化遺產(chǎn);2016年02期
2 劉鄂;;依違于禮教與宗教之間——《欽定大清刑律》“發(fā)掘墳?zāi)棺铩毖芯縖J];清華法學(xué);2014年06期
3 宋麗娟;;先秦墓葬破壞及防護略論[J];長江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年03期
4 劉冰雪;;清代風(fēng)水爭訟研究——以墳葬糾紛為例[J];政法論壇;2012年04期
5 陳新宇;;《欽定大清刑律》新研究[J];法學(xué)研究;2011年02期
6 王小丹;;清代“發(fā)!狈缸镱愋脱芯俊浴缎贪竻R覽》為中心[J];經(jīng)濟師;2010年09期
7 張傳勇;;旱魃為虐:明清北方地區(qū)的“打旱魃”習(xí)俗[J];中國社會經(jīng)濟史研究;2009年04期
8 周金波;;漢代墓葬防盜手段述論[J];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年06期
9 王子今;;中國古代懲治盜墓行為的禮俗傳統(tǒng)和法律制度[J];重慶師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年03期
10 王子今;;中國古代嚴懲盜墓行為的司法傳統(tǒng)[J];中國投資;2009年05期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 魏順光;清代中期墳產(chǎn)爭訟問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 馮荔荔;盜掘古墓葬犯罪的刑法學(xué)分析[D];浙江大學(xué);2013年
2 秦樹景;漢唐時期盜墓現(xiàn)象研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年
3 鄺璐;盜掘古文化遺址、古墓葬罪研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年
,本文編號:2435839
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2435839.html