【摘要】：《白虎通》在清代被重新喚起與研究,不始于乾嘉學(xué)者,而是因為康、雍間學(xué)者基于對明清以來科舉時藝的不滿,所以開始重新研究這部著作,并且隨著漢學(xué)運動的興起,才蔚為大觀。文章通過清人著名的八部經(jīng)學(xué)著作的抽樣調(diào)查與分析,論述了清代經(jīng)典詮釋中"禮制化"的基本特征。其特征體現(xiàn)了清代經(jīng)典詮釋回歸漢代的經(jīng)學(xué)語境以及對以往經(jīng)典詮釋資源的重新認識與有效的利用,在某種程度上展示出在經(jīng)典詮釋過程中不同經(jīng)學(xué)信仰的重合,消解了長期以來清代有學(xué)術(shù)無思想的負面形象,不僅使經(jīng)典本身獲得新的意義,而且還使詮釋者的視域與思想也獲得了新的提升�？疾烨宕�(jīng)典詮釋中"禮制化"的這一重要環(huán)節(jié),不僅是我們今天總結(jié)古代社會儒學(xué)禮制化的得失的需要,同時也是探討中華禮制文明的起源與形成的題中應(yīng)有之義。
[Abstract]:Bai Hu Tong was reawakened and studied in the Qing Dynasty, not from the scholars of Qianjia, but from Kang and Yong scholars, because they were dissatisfied with the art of imperial examinations since the Ming and Qing dynasties, so they began to study this work again, and with the rise of the Sinology movement, It is only then that it becomes a great sight. Through the sampling investigation and analysis of the famous eight classics works of Qing Dynasty, this paper discusses the basic characteristics of "ritual system" in the classical interpretation of Qing Dynasty. Its characteristics reflect the classical interpretation of the Qing Dynasty return to the Confucian context of the Han Dynasty, as well as the past classic interpretation of the resources of re-understanding and effective use, to a certain extent shows that in the process of classical interpretation of different Confucian beliefs overlap. It dispels the negative image of academic thought in Qing Dynasty for a long time, which not only makes the classics gain new meaning, but also promotes the horizon and thought of the interpreter. It is not only the need for us to sum up the gains and losses of Confucian etiquette in ancient society, but also the proper meaning of discussing the origin and formation of Chinese ritual civilization.
【作者單位】： 安徽大學(xué)徽學(xué)研究中心;
【分類號】：K249

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李健勝;;略論明代士人的經(jīng)典詮釋思想[J];青海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年02期

，

本文編號：2405397