【摘要】：梳理東漢第五倫的相關史料可以發(fā)現(xiàn),在《東觀漢記》、應劭《風俗通義》和袁宏《后漢紀》中擅長文法、行政剛猛的第五倫,經(jīng)過華嶠、范曄調整、重組相關史料,最終在范曄《后漢書》中以倡導寬和的良吏面貌出現(xiàn)。之前第五倫的種種作為,被歸結為個性峭直使然。結合對范曄《后漢書》列傳編纂的研究可知,范曄如此安排史料,旨在以《第五鐘離宋寒列傳》與《卓魯魏劉列傳》相呼應,構成完整的、按照不同政治風格劃分的"光武守業(yè)諸臣傳"的編次體系。范曄如此編排東漢初人物,蘊含自己對理想官員的期待及對東漢初吏治苛細的政治風格的批評。其根源與范曄對劉義康政治風格的否定有關。
[Abstract]:Combing through the relevant historical materials of the Fifth Run of the Eastern Han Dynasty, we can find that in the Eastview Han Records, the Shao and the Custom Tong Yi, and Yuan Hong's the later Han Dynasty, the Fifth Run, who is good at grammar and has a fierce administration, has been adjusted and reorganized through Hua Qiao and Fan Ye. Finally, in Fan Ye's Book of the Han Dynasty, it appeared as a good official who advocated leniency and harmony. The previous actions of the Fifth Run have been attributed to a sharp personality. Combined with the study of Fan Ye's compilation of the Biography of the later Han Dynasty, it can be seen that Fan Ye arranged the historical materials in such a way as to echo with the fifth bell the biography of Han from Song Dynasty and the biography of Zhuolu Wei Liu, so as to form a complete one. According to the different political styles of the division of the "Guangwu Shouye officials Biography" arrangement system. Fan Ye's arrangement of the characters in the early Eastern Han Dynasty contained his expectations for the ideal officials and his criticism of the strict political style of the officials in the early Eastern Han Dynasty. Its root is related to Fan Ye's negation of Liu Yikang's political style.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學歷史學院;
【分類號】：K234.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 曲柄睿;;范曄《后漢書》光武守業(yè)諸臣傳的編纂[J];史學理論與史學史學刊;2016年00期

2 孫正軍;;中古良吏書寫的兩種模式[J];歷史研究;2014年03期

3 周e，

本文編號：2387939