【摘要】：對于明代廣東海防三路的劃分時間、過程,前人多止于鄭若曾的《籌海圖編》,認為始于嘉靖末年。新近魯延召打破以往的認識格局,認為廣東海防區(qū)域的劃分始于元末,為劉鶚所提出。筆者通過對相關文獻的對比分析,認為元末說值得商榷。鄭若曾雖提出了三路劃分的設想,但基于種種原因,其設想之真正實踐乃經歷了由二路到三路的復雜過程,至萬歷四年(1576年)才得以實現(xiàn)。在分析海防分路形成時不僅要考慮到其與明代嶺南地區(qū)陸海防御重心時空格局的密邇關系,同時亦有必要將海防分路置于同北部邊防分路比較的視野下考量。故此,本文通過對史料的分析解讀,對相關問題再作探討。
[Abstract]:As for the division time and process of the three ways of Guangdong Haiphong in Ming Dynasty, most of the predecessors ended in Zheng Ruozeng's compilation of Chou Ching Chart, which was thought to have started in the late years of Jiajing. Lu Yanzhao recently broke the former understanding pattern and thought that the division of the coastal defense area in Guangdong began at the end of Yuan Dynasty and was put forward by Liu E. Through the comparative analysis of relevant documents, the author thinks that the theory of the end of Yuan is worth discussing. Zheng Ruozeng put forward the idea of dividing the three routes, but for various reasons, the real practice of his assumption was the complicated process from two roads to three routes, which was not realized until four years in Wanli (1576). In analyzing the formation of coastal defense separation, we should not only take into account its close relationship with the space-time pattern of land and sea defense center of gravity in Lingnan area in Ming Dynasty, but also consider the coastal defense separation from the perspective of comparison with northern frontier defense. Therefore, this paper through the analysis of historical data, to explore the relevant issues.
，

本文編號：2359557