“河圖”、“洛書”非點陣之圖考
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-15 15:15
【摘要】：欲判明先秦文獻中所記載的"河圖"、"洛書"是否點陣之圖,首先應求于先秦文獻中有關"河圖"、"洛書"的原始記載。根據(jù)《尚書·顧命》、《論語·子罕》和《周易·系辭上》中有關"河圖"、"洛書"的原始記載,無法得出"河圖"、"洛書"是點陣之圖的結(jié)論。非點陣之圖的結(jié)論,是根據(jù)胡應麟"辨?zhèn)伟朔?,核之并世之言以觀其稱,核之異世之言以觀其述,稱點陣之圖為"河圖"、"洛書"顯屬可疑,而且,劉牧在《易數(shù)鉤隱圖》的序言中自謂"采摭天地奇偶之數(shù),……點之成圖",無意之中,已露出了作偽的破綻。清代學者毛奇齡更將劉牧作偽之跡原原本本考察得十分清楚。劉牧為了使其創(chuàng)制的點陣之圖為人所重且行之于世,于是將點陣之圖托以"河圖"、"洛書"之名,也完全符合作偽的一般規(guī)律。堅持認為"河圖"、"洛書"為點陣之圖者所持之論據(jù),亦皆似是而非。因此,先秦文獻中所記載的"河圖"、"洛書"并非點陣之圖。
[Abstract]:In order to determine whether the "river map" and "Luo Shu" recorded in the literature of the pre-Qin Dynasty are lattice maps, it is necessary to seek the original records of the "river map" and "Luo Shu" in the literature of the pre Qin Dynasty. According to the original records of "river map" and "Luo Shu" in "Shang Shu Gu Diao", "the Analects of Confucius" and "Zhouyi", it is impossible to draw the conclusion that "river map", "Luo Shu" is the map of lattice. The conclusion of the non-lattice map is that according to Hu Ying-lin 's "eight methods of distinguishing forgeries", the theory of "nuclear amalgamation" is described as "river map", the "Luoshu" is suspicious, and the theory of "different times" of the nucleus is described as "river map". Liu Mu, in the preface of the Alphabet, describes himself as "taking the odd and even numbers of the earth and the earth." The plot of the point ", inadvertently, has revealed a false flaw." Qing Dynasty scholar Mao Qiling will Liu Mu as a false trace of the original inspection is very clear. In order to make the map of lattice created by Liu Mu important to the world, he took the map of the lattice as "river map" and "Luoshu", which completely accord with the general law of making false. The arguments held by those who insist that the river map and the Luo Shu are lattice maps are also specious. Therefore, the river map recorded in the literature of the pre-Qin Dynasty, Luoshu is not the map of the lattice.
【作者單位】： 天津師范大學歷史文化學院
【分類號】：K206
本文編號：2272939
[Abstract]:In order to determine whether the "river map" and "Luo Shu" recorded in the literature of the pre-Qin Dynasty are lattice maps, it is necessary to seek the original records of the "river map" and "Luo Shu" in the literature of the pre Qin Dynasty. According to the original records of "river map" and "Luo Shu" in "Shang Shu Gu Diao", "the Analects of Confucius" and "Zhouyi", it is impossible to draw the conclusion that "river map", "Luo Shu" is the map of lattice. The conclusion of the non-lattice map is that according to Hu Ying-lin 's "eight methods of distinguishing forgeries", the theory of "nuclear amalgamation" is described as "river map", the "Luoshu" is suspicious, and the theory of "different times" of the nucleus is described as "river map". Liu Mu, in the preface of the Alphabet, describes himself as "taking the odd and even numbers of the earth and the earth." The plot of the point ", inadvertently, has revealed a false flaw." Qing Dynasty scholar Mao Qiling will Liu Mu as a false trace of the original inspection is very clear. In order to make the map of lattice created by Liu Mu important to the world, he took the map of the lattice as "river map" and "Luoshu", which completely accord with the general law of making false. The arguments held by those who insist that the river map and the Luo Shu are lattice maps are also specious. Therefore, the river map recorded in the literature of the pre-Qin Dynasty, Luoshu is not the map of the lattice.
【作者單位】： 天津師范大學歷史文化學院
【分類號】：K206
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 鮑壽康;上古圖象文化考證[J];呼倫貝爾學院學報;2000年01期
2 劉起戧;;黑白點子河圖洛書[J];中國史研究;2006年04期
3 高維勛;;彰顯洛書文化[J];協(xié)商論壇;2006年04期
4 高勇;解讀《河圖》、《洛書》[J];渝西學院學報(社會科學版);2002年04期
5 蔣俐;;緯書略論[J];山東省農(nóng)業(yè)管理干部學院學報;2008年06期
6 趙新社;;河洛文化與媽祖文化[J];統(tǒng)一論壇;2006年01期
7 傅壽宗,黃季力;談正“SM”與反“SP”的來龍去脈[J];嶺南文史;1998年02期
8 劉正英;我國上古結(jié)繩記事探究[J];尋根;2000年05期
9 顧吉辰;《太極圖河洛探源》幾個問題商榷[J];洛陽師范學院學報;2005年04期
10 亞松;簡評《古史鉤沉》[J];歷史教學;1995年12期
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 劉保軍 高文治 譚 瀅;“洛出書”的傳說背后[N];河南日報;2004年
，本文編號：2272939
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2272939.html
