【摘要】：宗廟問題是劉賀立廢的一大關(guān)鍵,并與其政治命運(yùn)的狀態(tài)和走向密切相關(guān)。具體說來,由于與霍光集團(tuán)在宮省內(nèi)的爭(zhēng)斗失敗,劉賀"未見命高廟",就漢禮法而言,造成了有帝號(hào)而無帝位的尷尬局面,甚至無資格稱之為"漢廢帝"。而從其自號(hào)"嗣子皇帝"和"南藩�；韬�"中,既可看出其與高廟系統(tǒng)相聯(lián)接的渴盼,更有著對(duì)于昭帝承統(tǒng)的內(nèi)在否決,及向宗藩親王序列回歸的愿景。
[Abstract]:The issue of the temple is a key to Liu he-li-Wei, and closely related to the state and trend of his political destiny. Specifically, due to the failure of the struggle with Huoguang Group in the palace province, Liu he "did not see the fate of the high temple", as far as the ritual law of the Han Dynasty is concerned, it has caused an awkward situation of having the imperial name but no imperial position, and it is not even qualified to call it "the abolition of the Emperor in the Han Dynasty". From his own "Emperor of the Emperor of Suizi" and "Nanfan Sea Evening Hou", we can see that his desire to be connected with the system of high temples has a vision of the internal rejection of Emperor Zhao's succession and his return to the Suzerain-vassal princes.
【作者單位】： 江西師范大學(xué)歷史文化與旅游學(xué)院;
【基金】：2016年江西省高校人文社科重點(diǎn)研究基地項(xiàng)目“世界文化遺產(chǎn)視野下的�；韬顨v史文化價(jià)值研究”(JD16096)
【分類號(hào)】：K234.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 余華兵;;論劉賀立而復(fù)廢與經(jīng)明拾芥說[J];九江學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

2 余全介;經(jīng)學(xué)與政治——論劉賀立而復(fù)廢與《谷梁春秋》增立博士的關(guān)系[J];遼寧教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2201976