本文選題：王先謙 + 《尚書孔傳》��； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2013年博士論文

【摘要】：《尚書孔傳參正》是王先謙最重要的一部經(jīng)學(xué)著作，他對清代漢學(xué)有關(guān)《尚書》的研究成果作了一次較為全面、系統(tǒng)的整理和總結(jié)，是一部集大成之作；同時他對前人的研究成果有補充和發(fā)揮，對前人的誤漏有糾駁和疏正，他的經(jīng)解和考據(jù)也有許多獨到的見解和創(chuàng)獲。故本文著重從二個方面入手研究，一方面對清代漢學(xué)有關(guān)《尚書》研究的基本情況作整體把握和比較研究，對其進行較為全面、系統(tǒng)的考察；另一方面對《尚書孔傳參正》一書作了深入的解讀和探討，揭示其成就和價值，試圖客觀、公正地評判王先謙的學(xué)術(shù)成就及其歷史地位。 本文主要分為六部分：第一部分論述《尚書孔傳參正》的編纂體例及其對前人學(xué)術(shù)成果的匯輯�！秴⒄芬粫捎玫氖峭跸戎t最擅長的集解或集注類體裁，體例完備，編排合理，，他將乾嘉漢學(xué)最擅長的各種治學(xué)方法熔于一爐，將前人，尤其自清初閻若璩至清末皮錫瑞幾乎所有清代漢學(xué)大家有關(guān)《尚書孔傳》的辨?zhèn)我约笆枳C今、古文的代表性成果網(wǎng)羅無遺。第二部分探討王先謙對今、古文學(xué)術(shù)源流的梳理和考辨成就，主要從考正今文源流、梳理古文源流、厘清今、古文名實三個方面加以考察，并對他相關(guān)的學(xué)術(shù)觀點，那些是他吸納和整理前人的學(xué)術(shù)成果，那些是他本人的學(xué)術(shù)見識和考據(jù)所得，皆分別作了考辨。第三部分探討王先謙對今、古文的匯輯和考證之功。明古、今，為學(xué)者提供一部最全面的匯輯《尚書》今、古文文字差異和義說分歧的著作，這是王先謙撰《參正》一書的主旨之一。不僅如此，王先謙對各家義說的高下短長還作出了考校和評判，雖有偏向今文的傾向，但大體還能不拘門戶，實事求是。第四部分探討王先謙對偽書、傳的補證之功�！渡袝讉鳌方�(jīng)過明梅澾、清閻若璩等的辨?zhèn)我院�，其偽書面目基本被揭露出來。但清代也還有不少學(xué)者在繼續(xù)從事補充證偽的工作，頗有創(chuàng)獲，王先謙是其中的代表人物之一。辨真?zhèn)�，匯各家抉偽之說于一編，正是王先謙撰著《參正》一書的宗旨之一。本文主要從補證偽書二十五篇經(jīng)文的剿襲造偽、抉發(fā)偽孔擅改經(jīng)文之舉二個方面揭示了王先謙對偽書、傳經(jīng)文的補充證偽之功；從揭露偽孔傳剿襲之跡、求證偽孔傳出于王肅說、揭發(fā)皇甫謐與王肅合謀作偽之跡三個方面揭示了他對偽孔傳的補充證偽之功。第五部分探討王先謙對《尚書·禹貢》的水地考證之功。王先謙的水地之學(xué)，不僅在于對相關(guān)的古代文獻非常熟悉，而且還主張親歷實地，考古求證，這比那些純粹考按志乘的紙上談兵要高出一籌，所以，他有關(guān)《漢書·地理志》的補注和對《尚書·禹貢》的水地考證，可以說是中國古代水地之學(xué)的代表作品。第六部分探討王先謙明古今、辨真?zhèn)沃獾钠渌恍┲匾慕?jīng)解和考據(jù)成就。《參正》博采旁搜，極為繁博，以至作者為數(shù)不少的按語往往是淹沒在浩繁的旁征博引中，而為人所忽視。其實，他的按語有不少的部分系本人的獨到見解，皆頗為精審。本文對妑部分內(nèi)容進行了較為細致的梳理和挖掘，擇其要者而給予了分析研究。
[Abstract]:"Kong Chuancan" is the most important book of Confucian classics of Wang Xianqian. He made a comprehensive, systematic review of the achievements of the Sinology of the Qing Dynasty, a systematic arrangement and summary. At the same time, he supplemented and exerted his predecessors' research results, refuting and correcting the mistakes of the predecessors, and his interpretation and textual criticism. There are also many unique views and creation. Therefore, this article focuses on two aspects, on the one hand, to make a comprehensive and systematic study of the basic situation of the Sinology of the Qing Dynasty about the Shang Shu research, and to make a thorough interpretation and Discussion on the book Kong Chuancan. And value, trying to objectively and impartially judge Wang Xianqian's academic achievements and historical status.
This article is divided into six parts: the first part discusses the compilation style of Kong Chuancan in Shang Shu and the compilation of his predecessors' academic achievements. At the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, the second parts of the Qing Dynasty and the late Qing Dynasty, almost all of the Han Scholars in the Qing Dynasty, related to the identification of the Confucian classics, and the representative achievements of the ancient Chinese literature. The second part discussed Wang Xianqian's academic origin of the present and ancient Chinese literature, which mainly from the origin of the present text, combing the origin of the ancient texts, clarifying the present and the ancient Chinese characters. In the third part, the third part discusses the collection and textual criticism of the present, the ancient prose and the present, to provide the most comprehensive collection of the book, the present, the present, It is one of the themes of Wang Xianqian's book Shen Zheng, which is one of the works of the difference of ancient Chinese characters and meaning. Not only that, Wang Xianqian has also made the examination and evaluation of the high and short length of each meaning, although there is a tendency towards the present text, but in the general, it can not take the portal and seek truth from facts. The fourth part discusses the contribution of Wang Xianqian to the false books. Wang Xianqian is one of the representative figures of the Qing Dynasty, which is one of the representative figures. One of the main purposes of this article is to reveal the false work of Wang Xianqian's false book and the passage of Scripture from the two aspects of the suppression and counterfeit of the twenty-five texts of the false books and the false holes, and to reveal the falsification of the perjury and the passage of the scriptures; and from the three aspects of exposing the false holes and suppression of the attacks, seeking the false holes to pass out from Wang Su, and revealing the traces of the emperor's tranquil and Wang Su's purge. The fifth part of his supplementary falsification of the false orifice. The fifth part discusses the merit of the water land examination of "Shang Shu Yu Gong >". Wang Qian's water field is not only very familiar with the related ancient literature, but also advocates to experience the field and the archaeological evidence, which is better than those who are purely on the paper. The supplement of the Han book, geography, and the textual research on the water and land of Shang Shu Yu Gong can be said to be the representative works of the ancient Chinese water and land studies. The sixth part discusses some other important achievements of interpretation and textual criticism of Wang Xianqian's Ming and the ancient and modern times and the identification of the true and false. In fact, there are many parts of his note, which are all my unique views.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G256;K221.04

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 滕志賢;《詩三家義集疏》點校失誤辨析[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;2000年01期

2 孟偉;;王先謙駢文文論探析[J];船山學(xué)刊;2008年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李明;王先謙《漢書補注》研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2007年

本文編號：2108179