本文選題：遼朝 + 金朝�。� 參考：《遼寧大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：女性社會地位是婦女史研究領域中居主導地位的研究課題。女性作為占人類總人口一半的廣大群體,其社會地位的高低,不僅會直接關系到女性自身的發(fā)展,還會對整個社會的發(fā)展與進步產(chǎn)生重大的影響。而在我國古代婦女史研究領域之中,由于平民女性事跡很少被文獻史料記述,她們對所處社會的政治、經(jīng)濟和文化的影響也很難探究。所以,見諸歷史文獻記載的歷代貴族女性就自然成為了我國古代婦女史的主要研究對象。貴族女性對于所處社會的發(fā)展均作出過或大或小的貢獻,因此,對貴族女性社會地位進行研究,不僅很有必要,而且具有十分重要的學術意義。 遼金兩朝分別為契丹族和女真族建立的民族政權,時間上前后相繼,分別與五代諸政權及北宋、南宋兩朝對峙,統(tǒng)治我國北方地區(qū)達300多年。契丹和女真兩族均屬于我國古代北方游牧、漁獵民族,因此,由其建立的遼金兩朝有著許多相似之處。而具體到兩朝貴族女性的社會地位上,也同樣呈現(xiàn)出了諸多類同。不過,由于兩朝在文化傳統(tǒng)上仍存在著一定的差異,在封建化進程中各自的側重點有所不同,因而,便使得兩朝貴族女性在其社會地位上也存在著一些不同于彼此的獨特之處。 前賢學者已有關于遼、金兩朝貴族女性社會地位的一些論著,但并未將二者予以比較研究。本文試從遼金兩朝貴族女性的政治地位、家庭地位和法律地位入手,對遼金貴族女性的社會地位進行全面的論述,比較其異同,分析其變化及原因。并期能夠通過這些比較和分析,為日后進一步深入研究遼金兩朝政治、社會、經(jīng)濟等方面的課題,提供新的思考角度。 本論文主要從三個方面對遼金貴族女性的社會地位進行闡述。第一方面主要對遼金兩朝貴族女性的社會構成以簡要勾勒,明確本文研究對象的階層分布和階層特點。第二方面為文章第二、三、四部分,主要對遼金兩朝貴族女性的社會地位進行比較論述,即分別從政治地位、家庭地位和法律地位三個視角,對兩朝貴族女性社會地位的異同予以比較分析。第三方面主要論述遼金兩朝貴族女性社會地位的嬗變及其原因。筆者期望通過以上三個方面的詳細闡述與比較分析,最終能揭示出遼金兩朝貴族女性社會地位的整體狀況。
[Abstract]:The social status of women is a leading research topic in the field of women's history. The social status of women, which accounts for half of the total human population, is not only directly related to the development of women themselves, but also has a significant impact on the development and progress of the whole society. In the research field of women's history in ancient China, because the deeds of civilian women are seldom recorded in the literature, their influence on the politics, economy and culture of their society is also very difficult to explore. Therefore, the aristocratic women recorded in the historical documents have naturally become the main research objects of the ancient women's history of our country. Aristocratic women have made great or small contributions to the development of their society. Therefore, it is not only necessary but also of great academic significance to study the social status of aristocratic women. The Liao and Jin dynasties were established by the Qidan nationality and the Nuzhen nationality respectively. They were confronted with the regimes of the five dynasties and the Northern Song Dynasty and the Southern Song Dynasty respectively and ruled the northern region of our country for more than 300 years. Qidan and Nuzhen both belong to the ancient nomadic fishing and hunting nationalities in the north of China. Therefore the Liao and Jin dynasties established by them have many similarities. And specific to the social status of aristocratic women in the two dynasties, also showed a lot of similarities. However, due to the differences between the two dynasties in the cultural tradition, in the process of feudalization, there are different emphases, therefore, the two dynasties aristocratic women in their social status also have some different from each other's unique place. Former scholars have written about the social status of aristocratic women in Liao and Jin dynasties, but they have not been compared. Starting with the political status, family status and legal status of aristocratic women in Liao and Jin dynasties, this paper makes a comprehensive discussion on the social status of aristocratic women in Liao and Jin dynasties, compares their similarities and differences, and analyzes their changes and reasons. Through these comparison and analysis, it can provide a new angle of thinking for the further study of the political, social and economic aspects of Liao and Jin dynasties in the future. This paper mainly expounds the social status of aristocratic women in Liao and Jin dynasties from three aspects. On the one hand, the social composition of aristocratic women in Liao and Jin dynasties is briefly outlined, and the stratum distribution and stratum characteristics of the object of this paper are clarified. The second part is the second, third and fourth parts of the article. It mainly compares the social status of the aristocratic women in the Liao and Jin dynasties, that is, from the three perspectives of political status, family status and legal status. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the social status of aristocratic women in the two dynasties. The third aspect mainly discusses the evolution and reasons of the aristocratic women's social status in Liao and Jin dynasties. The author hopes that through the detailed elaboration and comparative analysis of the above three aspects, it will finally reveal the overall status of the aristocratic women in the Liao and Jin dynasties.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K246.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王可賓;;女真公主述要[J];北方文物;1990年03期

2 胡興東;遼代后妃與遼代政治[J];北方文物;2003年02期

3 夏宇旭;;論金代女真人與契丹人的婚姻關系[J];北方文物;2008年02期

4 金紫衡;試論遼承天后的文治武功[J];渤海學刊;1988年03期

5 董四禮;;金朝后妃制度初探[J];黑龍江檔案;2006年02期

6 王善軍;;論遼代后族[J];黑龍江民族叢刊;2007年02期

7 向南;楊若薇;;論契丹族的婚姻制度[J];歷史研究;1980年05期

8 蔡美彪;遼代后族與遼季后妃三案[J];歷史研究;1994年02期

9 高世瑜;關于婦女史研究的幾點思考[J];歷史研究;2002年06期

10 島田正郎,何天明;遼代契丹人的婚姻[J];蒙古學信息;2004年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 李忠芝;金代完顏氏世婚制研究[D];吉林大學;2007年

2 王艷俠;《遼史》中的女性史料研究[D];東北師范大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1934507