本文選題：明代中朝關(guān)系 + 抗倭援朝戰(zhàn)爭��； 參考：《古代文明》2017年01期

【摘要】：抗倭援朝戰(zhàn)爭初期,明與朝鮮間本來穩(wěn)固的宗藩互信關(guān)系出現(xiàn)危機(jī)。戰(zhàn)前,先是朝鮮私自通信日本種下禍根,繼由東亞貿(mào)易網(wǎng)傳來朝鮮誘引日本入犯大明的報(bào)告。朝鮮感到壓力后迅速派使辯誣,暫時(shí)修復(fù)了信任關(guān)系。戰(zhàn)初,朝鮮節(jié)節(jié)潰敗,但遲遲未向明廷請(qǐng)?jiān)?再度引起明朝懷疑。面對(duì)危局,明朝主動(dòng)派人勘疑,先后派三撥使節(jié)進(jìn)入朝鮮;朝鮮則連遣使節(jié)入遼、入京請(qǐng)?jiān)?同時(shí)與東來明使臣溝通,釋疑辯誣。經(jīng)過努力,雙方終于再建信任關(guān)系,并迅速投入到聯(lián)合對(duì)日作戰(zhàn)中。上述信任危機(jī)的產(chǎn)生及其應(yīng)對(duì)處置,一方面揭示出明代中朝"典型宗藩關(guān)系"中存在"不典型"的一面,"事大字小"行為中隱含著別有意味的內(nèi)涵;另一方面也反映了明、鮮宗藩關(guān)系框架下,辯誣、勘疑等手段因常用于處理不良事件而成為宗藩體制之重要內(nèi)容。
[Abstract]:At the beginning of the war, there was a crisis in the suzerain-vassal trust relationship between Ming and North Korea. Before the war, North Korea privately wrote to Japan to sow the scourge, followed by reports from the East Asian Trade Network that North Korea induced Japan to commit the invasion of Daming. North Korea felt the pressure quickly sent the argument falsely, temporarily repaired the relationship of trust. At the beginning of the war, North Korea was defeated, but delayed to seek assistance from the Ming Dynasty, again aroused suspicion in the Ming Dynasty. In the face of crisis, the Ming Dynasty took the initiative to send people to investigate and suspect, sending three envoys to North Korea successively; North Korea sent envoys to Liao Dynasty, to Beijing to ask for assistance, and at the same time to communicate with the envoys of the Ming Dynasty to explain the suspicion and defend the case. After hard work, the two sides finally re-established trust, and quickly into the joint war against Japan. The emergence of the trust crisis mentioned above and how to deal with it reveal, on the one hand, the "atypical" side of the "typical suzerain-vassal relationship" between China and China in the Ming Dynasty, in which there is an implication in the behavior of "big characters and small characters"; on the other hand, it also reflects the Ming Dynasty. Under the framework of Suzerain-vassal relationship, the defense of falsehood and suspicion has become an important content of the suzerain-vassal system because it is often used to deal with adverse events.
【作者單位】： 南開大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：K248.205

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 楊理連;;天津在明朝抗倭援朝戰(zhàn)爭中的作用分析[J];鄖陽師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

2 張習(xí)孔;;四百年前的抗倭援朝戰(zhàn)爭[J];文史知識(shí);2000年04期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 于海洋;明抗倭援朝戰(zhàn)爭中的平壤戰(zhàn)役研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2015年

2 閔學(xué)進(jìn);抗倭援朝戰(zhàn)爭與朝中關(guān)系[D];延邊大學(xué);2004年

3 鄭俊榮;萬歷時(shí)期援朝抗倭戰(zhàn)爭前后明與朝鮮流通的銀[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1813746