本文選題：清代 + 武狀元��； 參考：《歷史檔案》2017年04期

【摘要】：清代科舉狀元研究中,114名文狀元的籍貫、地域分布等問題已基本明晰,但109名武狀元的籍貫和地域分布問題仍未完全清楚。以往學(xué)者對武狀元籍貫和地域分布問題的研究,多根據(jù)清人朱彭壽《舊典備征》中的"武鼎甲考",但該書對清代武狀元的記載存在兩方面問題:一是缺載14名武狀元籍貫;二是對一些武狀元籍貫的記載不準(zhǔn)確。本文利用中國第一歷史檔案館所藏武會試錄、武登科錄和小金榜等檔案,對《舊典備征》"武鼎甲考"中缺載和記載不準(zhǔn)確的武狀元籍貫進(jìn)行考訂,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對清代狀元的地域分布問題試做分析。
[Abstract]:The origin and geographical distribution of 114 literary champions in the imperial examination of the Qing Dynasty have been basically clear, but the origin and regional distribution of 109 martial arts figures are still not completely clear.In the past scholars' studies on the origin and regional distribution of the Wuzhou-Yuan Dynasty were mostly based on the "Wu Dingjia examination" in Zhu Pengshou's the Old Code of Qing Dynasty, but there were two problems in the recording of the Wuzhou-Yuan Dynasty in this book: the first one was the lack of 14 native titles of the Wuzhou-Yuan Dynasty;Second, some of the martial arts of origin of inaccurate records.This paper makes use of the records of the Chinese first Historical Archives, Wudengke and Xiaojinbang, and so on, to make an examination of the place of origin of the Wudingjia examination, which is missing and inaccurate recorded in the "preparation of the Old Classics".On the basis of this, the paper tries to analyze the regional distribution of the first place in Qing Dynasty.
【作者單位】： 中國第一歷史檔案館利用處;
【分類號】：K249
，

本文編號：1754776