發(fā)布時間：2018-04-10 08:57

  本文選題：膽　切入點：勇敢　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】："膽"觀念在漢語思想世界中的精神意味開啟于漢代人對膽腑的基本理解方式。在《黃帝內(nèi)經(jīng)》和《白虎通》中,"膽"既指向作為身體內(nèi)部諸臟器之一的血肉之膽,同時又指向人的精神活動之勇敢和意志決斷力。漢代人把膽視為具有心理功能的生理臟器,認(rèn)為膽腑參與人的意志決斷活動,跟人性之勇敢與怯懦直接相關(guān),但這卻是笛卡爾以來的機械身體觀與腦科學(xué)難以接受的。而隱藏在對膽的理解差異背后的,其實是中、西方不同的身心觀,因此本文以笛卡爾的身心二元論對膽的理解方式為參照,對《內(nèi)經(jīng)》的膽論進行解讀。漢代人的"膽"論開啟了"膽"在漢語思想中的基本內(nèi)涵,每當(dāng)言及"膽",膽的精神與生理的雙重意蘊總會同時到來,而對于個體行動的意志和勇氣發(fā)自血肉之膽,后人更是篤信無疑。到了漢魏之際,由于亂世求英雄及魏晉士人的個體意志之覺醒,膽所特有的勇敢和意志之精神品質(zhì)更是受到人們的普遍關(guān)注,并與聰明之才質(zhì)相對應(yīng),在劉劭的《人物志·英雄篇》和嵇康、呂安的辯論文《明膽論》中得到主題化討論。本文將對劉劭的英雄之辯和嵇康的明膽之辯進行深入分析,并就中西方對聰明與膽勇(或者說理智與意志)之關(guān)系的不同理解方式進行對比。此外,本文還將圍繞嵇康的意志思想,討論膽志在魏晉時代的突顯,并試圖對"膽"問題何以在漢魏之際得到主題化討論進行理論解析,以期更完整地領(lǐng)會魏晉思想世界。
[Abstract]:"Dan" concept in Chinese thought in the world of spirit means open to the people of Han Dynasty on the basic understanding of gall bladder. In Huangdi Neijing < > and < > baihutong, "Dan" is pointing to the various organs of the body as flesh and blood bile, and point to the spiritual activities of the courage and the will decisiveness. The people of the Han Dynasty as the common physiological organ has psychological function, that participants will decide gall bladder activity, with the human brave directly associated with cowardice, but this is the mechanical body since Descartes's view is difficult to accept and brain science. But behind the differences in understanding of the bile, is actually in the west, different physical and mental outlook, according to Descartes's dualism of common understanding of the way as the reference, the interpretation of "the theory of the Han people." "bile bile" theory opens the basic connotation of "Dan" in Chinese thought, when mentioned "guts", bile The mental and physical double meanings always come at the same time, and for the individual action will and courage from the flesh and blood of the bile, is believed to posterity. The awakening times due to the occasion of the Han, Wei and Jin Dynasties for heroes and the individual will, bile peculiar courage and the will of the spirit of quality is more attention, and wise before the corresponding, in Liu Shao - hero biography < > and Ji Kang, Lv An's argumentation theory has been the theme of "Ming bile. This paper will discuss on the hero of Liu Shao and Ji Kang that the debate debate bile in-depth analysis, and on the West of smart and bile (or reason and will Yong) the relationship between the different ways of understanding were compared. In addition, this paper will focus on the will of Ji Kang thought, discussed in bile in the Wei and Jin Dynasties highlight, and tried to" bile "why in the period from Han Dynasty to the theme of the discussion In order to comprehend the ideological world of the Wei and Jin Dynasties more completely, the theoretical analysis was carried out.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K23

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 閻世平,董虹凌;劉劭的才德觀研究[J];廣東社會科學(xué);2001年02期

2 閻世平;劉劭和諧思想研究[J];廣東經(jīng)濟管理學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年Z1期

3 徐光太,丁慧民;劉劭人才思想初探[J];江淮論壇;1989年01期

4 張長明;柳祥美;曾祥云;;劉劭“辯難”思想探析[J];長沙理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

5 喻凡;劉劭《人物志》中的政治觀和人才觀[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1990年01期

6 閻世平;劉劭的名實觀研究[J];佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2001年02期

7 燕國材;;評劉劭的多元智能論[J];心理科學(xué);2008年01期

8 秦躍宇;龍延;;綜合名實與中庸至德——劉劭儒道兼治研究[J];內(nèi)江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年05期

9 徐光太;張和敬;;一部彌足珍貴的人才心理學(xué)專著——劉劭《人物志》初探[J];安徽師大學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1988年03期

10 鄭萬耕;曹植劉劭的唯物主義觀點[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);1994年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 萬思艷;漢魏時期的“膽”觀念探微[D];華東師范大學(xué);2017年

2 余驍;劉劭人才思想及其借鑒價值研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2005年

3 張蔓;論劉劭《人物志》的才性辨認(rèn)[D];華東師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1730539