鄭玄“三族九族同姓”說的特色及意義
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-04-06 00:06
本文選題:鄭玄 切入點(diǎn):三族父子孫 出處:《史學(xué)月刊》2017年04期
【摘要】:漢唐經(jīng)學(xué)家對"三族""九族"親屬構(gòu)成的解釋,大致可分成"同姓"說和"異姓"說兩派意見。東漢時(shí),"九族異姓"說占據(jù)經(jīng)學(xué)解釋的主流。漢末,鄭玄對九族構(gòu)成問題重新做解,他在三《禮》注中堅(jiān)持"三族父子孫"論,以此為論證起點(diǎn),縝密推演出"九族同姓"的結(jié)論,并對"九族異姓"說代表學(xué)者許慎展開反駁。通過考察庾蔚之和孔穎達(dá)對鄭玄"同姓"說的評價(jià),可發(fā)現(xiàn)鄭玄的"九族同姓"說乃是希望通過建構(gòu)同姓親屬地位至上的族內(nèi)倫理規(guī)范,重新定義"天子親九族"的內(nèi)涵,借此作為對東漢中后期外戚亂政現(xiàn)象的反思,帶有告誡后世皇帝"親同姓、遠(yuǎn)異姓"的現(xiàn)實(shí)關(guān)懷意味。
[Abstract]:The explanation of "three tribes" and "nine families" by scholars in Han and Tang dynasties can be divided into two groups: "same surname" theory and "different surname" theory.In the Eastern Han Dynasty, the theory of "nine nationalities with different surnames" dominated the interpretation of Confucian classics.At the end of the Han Dynasty, Zheng Xuan reinterpreted the problem of the composition of the nine ethnic groups. He insisted on the theory of "three fathers and sons and grandchildren" in his notes on the three Rites, taking this as the starting point of the argument and carefully deducing the conclusion of "nine people of the same surname".Xu Shen, a representative scholar of the Nine nationalities with different surnames, refuted it.By examining Yu Wei's and Kong Yingda's comments on Zheng Xuan's theory of "the same family name", it can be found that Zheng Xuan's theory of "nine people of the same surname" is the hope of redefining the connotation of "the son of Heaven and the ninth clan" by constructing the ethical norms of the supremacy of the status of relatives of the same family.Taking this as a reflection on the phenomenon of foreign disorderly government in the middle and late Han Dynasty, it has a realistic concern meaning of warning the later emperors "the same family name, far different surnames".
【作者單位】: 北京大學(xué)歷史學(xué)系;
【分類號】:K234.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 錢杭;再論“九族”今、古文說[J];史林;1993年01期
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 王爾;;鄭玄“三族九族同姓”說的特色及意義[J];史學(xué)月刊;2017年04期
2 錢杭;;宗族建構(gòu)過程中的血緣與世系[J];歷史研究;2009年04期
,本文編號:1717068
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgtslw/1717068.html
教材專著